Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree with Khan as far as JER being burnt out his last go round at Days. You can def tell his heart was not into it all. Now in defense of Tomlin, I have been watching since 92. I sat through the writing regimes, of JERx2, Langan( I tuned out due to the teen invasion) SSM, Brash and Cwickly( The best days team since JER) Higley and that terrible Sheffer( I tuned out again under his watch) I will say Days hasnt not been this good since B&C. Higley is not the best but she is miles better than Langan and Hogan. She just needs a strong co HW who will make things happen. This board at one time not too long ago was all about Days. Their is no Days hype on this board at all. You should have been here a few years ago as many can tell you. In fact all out wars used to happen over Days. So there is no hype here. I am in the camp of Days hasnt been this good in a long time. THough it's not perfect, I will take what I have now over Hogan or Lagan any day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it was his era of Sunset Beach that I enjoyed the best, but I always find it hard to remember who did what. But that kind of show seems to be his forte--ie camp. (For the record, at its best I loved Sunset Beach's camp--yet hated Passion's brand of camp. I think it mainly had to do with Beach seeming to have better dialogue and stories that actually moved at a nice clip--Passions for all the desire it had to be a campy soap that non soap fans would like as much as soap fans, it was so slow, and such an endless cycle of virtually identical scenes and conversations that I just couldn't handle it).

His era at OLTL was a weird creature--between him and Whitesall and Broiderick, such an odd team. But it did have some fun moments, and I loved the, ok, gimmicky moments like Live Week, Babes Behind Bars and Trading Spaces (Places?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It may not be fair, but I think Tomlin helps direct Higley's stories quite a bit-- And I admit that's ALL conjecture on my aprt because I think her era on One Life was just so awful--it was slow, it was unimaginative, and it was actually often quite offensive (and it takes a lot for me to actually find a soap offensive lol).

Oh and back to Tomlin I think I'm in the sharp minority again but I didn't mind the couple of months he wrote of OLTL during the last writer's strike... It did ruin the momentum of some of RC's work but I also actually prefered some of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am *not* a JER fan, but even I can admit that some of his stuff was really, even if not to my taste, good and some really bad. I dunno, I do have the feeling he had a short shelf life and illness or not (wasn't hisdeath sudden? Though of course we don't know the issues) it woulda been a big surprise for him to come back with greatness. But I do get why he has such loyal fans (if that doesn't sound like a complete contradiction).

That said, I get the impression he didn't wanna leave Passion as HW--or am I wrong? He might not have accepted Days if NBC had made him step down on Passions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, NBC would never have made him step down from PASSIONS. That was part of the problem, I think. NBC stupidly believed JER (or any HW, really) could handle HW'ing tasks for two hour-long soaps. What they should have done instead was ask JER who'd he recommend for DAYS, then try and work out a deal with that individual to take over. Otherwise, as successful as JER was @ DAYS the first time around, there was no guarantee at all that he'd be as successful there again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
    • KMH's Emily was a harbinger for the lack of dignity many characters would face in the last decade of ATWT. On paper, many of the stories given to Melanie Smith's Emily could have been extremely sleazy, but she was treated with respect and understanding in the writing. By 1996 the show went from often not knowing how to write for KMH's Emily to giving her outright reprehensible material. There were breaks from this treatment, but not enough, with even those breaks often being poorly written or just used to make her look even worse (like her grotesque rape story turning into her using her rape to destroy Margo's marriage).  By the last years I don't even know what the hell they were doing. Wasn't there some kind of mother-daughter whoring story with Emily and Alison? Wasn't Emily getting beaten up by johns? Whenever I think of how they wrote for KMH's Emily I'm reminded of Pauline Kael's quote about Ann-Margaret's '60s movie persona - calling her "dirty" and saying the people who made the movies "knew what men wanted to do to her."  Even as much as ATWT started hiring softcore actors in the mid/late '90s, the Emily treatment was on a whole other level. I have never known what audience they thought they were going to be attracting.
    • At this point the options are 1. Leslie is going to be caught out, arrested and jailed. Hit and run, blackmail etc. 2. She gets off due to lack of evidence. Second option keeps her on the show but how are they going to keep her a viable character? No one should want to have anything to do with her. If they keep her around, won't other characters come off looking stupid for putting up with her? I'm interested to see where they go with this character/story and hope not to be disappointed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy