Jump to content

David Nelson has passed away


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Ricky got all the attention, and it wasn't difficult to see why, but I thought David was very underrated, very quietly handsome, with a nice calm presence, with some comic chops of his own. It's a shame that the family became so known for dysfunction and the show is seen as passe - it is, but is also much more watchable than a lot of sitcoms, then and now. Check out some of the many dirt cheap copies you can find in stores.

http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-david-nelson-20110112,0,1039470.story

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Rest in peace, indeed. David was totally underrated...I like Ricky, but sometimes he could be a little obnoxious (especially in episodes in the middle of the run when he was really eating up the teen idol label). David was always a solid, calm figure on the show, and I always thought he was better-looking than Rick.

I wish they aired somewhere nationally. Even when TV Land and Nick at Nite were still devoted to older shows, O&H never managed to get on either one or enjoy a second life that shows like Lucy, Leave It to Beaver, and to a lesser extent Donna Reed and Father Knows Best had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ricky annoyed me a lot in the early years, especially when they had to do the smart aleck talk and the "hip" talk...I think he used to say "man" a lot. As the show went on he got quieter, probably since Rick did, and his looks did the talking, along with a certain quiet confidence.

In a lot of ways I also thought David was more handsome, perhaps because he was less obvious, sturdier. Something else that I remember a little from those later episodes after David and Ricky each got married was that the show didn't exactly try to ignore that David and his wife were both attractive and young people who probably enjoyed sex. They were never going to say this directly, but it was still a departure from a lot of sitcoms of that era - at that point the only other sitcom which hinted at this was Darren and Samantha on Bewitched, a few years later. David and his wife also had a good chemistry on the show and she had good comic timing - I thought Ricky's wife was a bit of a drag.

There's a video on Youtube of Ricky and David as a Union and Confederate soldier for some John Wayne patriotic special from 1970. That must have been the last TV thing they did together.

I think Ozzie and Harriet is public domain, or some of it is, which means very scattered releases. The same is true for Life With Elizabeth and some of Burns of Allen, I believe. I'm glad I got to see those shows so cheap, you could go to the dollar store and find them for very little, but that means an official release seems almost impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, there are tons of sites you can go to and watch countless episodes of those shows and others. I haven't watched Ozzie and Harriet in a while, and I hate that this might be the thing to prompt me to pay more attention to it.

I've never really seen a lot of the later episodes. There is a color episode in public domain that I watched and liked, and it centered on David and Kristen. They sorta reminded me of Robbie and Katie on My Three Sons. They were young, they were obviously in love each other, but they were very quiet and reserved about their relationship. With David and Kristen, since they were really a couple, I guess a lot of that had to do with wanting to retain at least a little bit of privacy. It had to be awkward whenever they'd be romantic for the cameras.

A lot of those so-called "wholesome" family shows from that era are shortchanged some credit for being a little progressive. I've been watching Hazel a lot, and I totally forgot the wife/mom on there owned her own business. Donna Stone was seen working in various medical settings, too. I always thought that they were sorta making a statement on O&H by not showing Ozzie's job. Obviously the Nelsons were welfare queens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The main thing that bothered me about the women on My Three Sons is I felt they lacked personality and drive. I haven't seen the show in a long time, especially those later years, but there was a strange energy drain. I blame Dody. :lol:

I have never seen any color episodes of Ozzie and Harriet, just the black and white. I remember one where Kristen worked as his secretary, or something like that. It was just a very casual, no-nonsense expression of affection between a young husband and wife, as you mention, slightly restrained, but in some ways also very rare for that time.

Those shows are shortchanged all the time. I remember how Gilmore Girls trashed the Donna Reed Show, yet in the end most of the people I knew who watched Gilmore Girls watched for which man Lorelei or Rory was going to be with, whereas Donna Reed, while not exactly a liberated show, had Donna as her own character, not just a wife or mother. With Ozzie and Harriet, Harriet does what she wants, and if she doesn't then she's just placating Ozzie, who deep down knows she is the one who is in charge. I think Ozzie was a salesman or something, but generally he was a layabout, and he couldn't have gone on without Harriet.

I think "modern" shows like Everybody Loves Raymond, the later years of Roseanne, etc. are much more harsh and much more harshly dated in their view of women and of relationships. The wife as an emasculating shrew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Forgive me for veering the thread off the topic of David.

Dody was worse than Cousin Oliver :lol: The early seasons of Sons were so loud and chaotic, but I love that, and it definitely makes it stand out from the other family sitcoms of that era. Once the boys grew up and started having romances, the show slowed down, got softer, calmed down a little bit, and got quieter, and I like that too. I thought it was pretty appropriate. The wives were so dull, though, I can't deny that. Katie was okay. I never saw anything with oldest son Mike's wife, but I liked Katie. Polly was a bore, but she was tolerable. I think they were in a tough time for how to write young women in comedic television.

I hate it when people down Donna Reed in particular. She and the show openly embraced a sense of women's lib and feminist before the rest of primetime did. When the show began, the opening featured Donna seeing the kids off to school and her husband off to work before closing the door and contentedly smiling at her home. In the later years, she (with an enormous bouffant) saw the kids and Alex off before grabbing her purse and going out herself. But that spirit was a part of the show from the very beginning.

Only Leave It to Beaver (of the popular, long-running sitcoms) was ultra-backwards like that. In one episode, Ward (King of the Douchebags) actually says something along the lines of, "A woman's place is in the home. And if she's at home, she might as well be in the kitchen." Like WTF? Obviously it wasn't said in a sarcastic or tongue-in-cheek way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I appreciate your POV and ideas here. I don't, however, trust Josh Griffith to make this anything like a good story. My guess is that much of it will be off-camera and that we'll have to be happy with Mariah retelling the nightmare in bits and pieces. Meanwhile, Tessa will still be strumming her damn guitar with Daniel. Ugh. I know I'm negative about this show. I am hate watching with every fiber of my being, and there's nothing about it that's working for me. I never recall Y&R being worse.
    • A batch of photos from Episode #67 which aired Thursday June 5 in USA. Some are scene pictures, and some are behind-the-scenes. https://www.paramountpressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/shows/beyond-the-gates/photos?episode=25710 Posting because there's a pic of director Michael V. Pomarico; and a pic of director Steven Williford whose photo caption says "J. Steven Williford".
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think the gross ickiness is Josh Griffith's intention. At birth, Ian Ward stole Mariah from Sharon, so that Sharon knew only of the Cassie twin and not the Mariah twin.  Sharon gave up Cassie for adoption at birth, never knowing that Mariah existed. When Ian Ward stole baby Mariah, he had her be raised by a woman member of his cult. She grew up in his cult. Years later, after Mariah was an adult in Genoa City and had left him, he tried to kidnap her to marry him himself, I sort of remember some icky scenes where he had arranged a wedding, but she escaped or was rescued -- it was so gross that I chose to forget it, and I don't want to look up the details. Mariah is feeling traumatized/triggered by Ian Ward being in Genoa City several months ago, because he was obsessed with her, and he terrorized her loved ones, interacted with Tessa, and drugged Sharon, which ultimately resulted in the death of Heather -- causing the grief of Daniel and Lucy. None of that was Mariah's fault. But she was so horrified by what happened, that she feels she did something wrong that caused this hateful villain to continue to obsess about her.   Based on small comments that Mariah made recently, I think she feels completely worthless. I gather that when she was away on the business trip a month or two ago, all of what happened with Ian Ward and Heather's death just hit her all at once and she was mentally/emotionally collapsing, and just felt unable to call for help.  During the business trip she sat in her hotel room and spiraled more, feeling more and more worthless and afraid. Finally she started drinking at a bar, and that's when the creepy old man approached her.  By that point, she wasn't in her right mind, and started interacting with the guy.  Either she thought he was Ian, or she thought he was someone like Ian, and she would be *required* to flirt with him in a role play, and do what he commanded, almost like old programming being reactivated.  Or perhaps just simple self-loathing playing out. I don't know if the guy actually knew Ian or Jordan, or if he was a random stranger.  But Mariah's fear/loathing/subconscious chaos kicked in. And then... well that's as far as her flashbacks have aired so far. She can't bear to face the rest of whatever it was.  I gather that in the coming episodes, we'll (eventually) find out what happened next as we see more of the icky flashbacks. --------------- The rest of this post is only my speculation: I think that she felt like she was supposed to have sex with him but didn't want to, and may have tried to kill him instead. Or he r*ped her.  Or they didn't have sex at all, but it's all convoluted in her mind.  Something horrible happened but I don't think it was her fault.  If the man died, maybe she covered it up?  I really don't know, I'm just speculating ideas. At any rate, I'm totally convinced that this is NOT a conventional "cheating storyline" where someone willingly has sex outside their relationship. ----------------- This is basically Josh Griffith's obsession with dark storylines, creepy villains, and terrible writing of "mental health issues".
    • The most we ever saw was on the "Roger years" tape.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy