Jump to content

Radio Soap Opera Discussion


Bright Eyes

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 612
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

@Matt thanks for posting and reviving the thread.

Thanks for Tomorrow must have been fairly short lived as it is quite obscure. Hasit been mentioned here before? And it seems Mary Jane Higby was the lead in this and When A Girl Marries.

Oh and I think it should Nov 1951.

Edited by Paul Raven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Thanks for Tomorrow" is a bit of a mystery. The doesn't seem to last that long. I've seen it described as a summer replacement and the number of papers listing in in their listings definitely seems to drop around mid-September, 1949, though some places list it well until the end of 1949. There is a Teri Keane article that floats around during this period claiming her character on "Thanks for Tomorrow" has recently married. 

In 1950, there is some publicity regarding a revival of the show that NBC is shopping around as a West Coast recorded serial starring Charles Boyer in the lead role. I don't think this proposed soap ever occurred. Also, there is a play by a Roy Bailey from 1937-1938 called "Thanks for Tomorrow" about a spoiled young man who gets involved in crime and has a blind sister. I can't help wonder if that wasn't some of the source material. Articles at the time suggest that TfT was also a bit of a version of the film "Enchanted Cottage."

The conversations in "The Guiding Light" thread have me intrigued about the first years of the new "Guiding Light" so I've been looking into 1947-1950. Basically, the material leading up to the long stretch of episodes available. 

The show seems to move through a lot of story in the first year. The opening plot involving Roger Barton's decision to reinvent himself as Ray Brandon after fifteen years in prison for a crime he didn't commit is intriguing. Ray's decision to build a legal career puts him in an interesting position. It gives him insight into both sides of the law. The need for connection with the life he was forced to leave behind (his wife, Julie, and his son, Roger Barton (now Collins), Jr. ) shaped Roger/Ray as a character in the vein of many Phillips' complicated heroines, young women who have had lost access to their children. 

In my opinion, it would seem that the Ray story borrows the most from the earlier Frances Holden/Frederika Lang plot. Frances had been in a bad marriage and abandoned her child with Rev. Rutledge to give her child Ned a life while she was on the run because of her involvement in a crime her husband committed. Ray was forced to give his child up under similar circumstances; he was implicated in a crime he didn't commit, except he was taken from his child rather than being given a choice. I imagine, like Frederika, that Ray and Roger must have met eventually. And while Frederika's murder of her duplicitious husband Paul nearly landed her on death row, Ray's revenge plot against Martin McClaine (who set him up for embezzlement) threatens to destroy his son's love for Susan, Martin's daughter.  There are deviations. Instead of Ray on trial, it is Julie Barton Collins, Ray's former wife, who ends up on trial for the murder/accidental death of her second husband, Frank Collins. I imagine that it is Ray who helps Julie get off. 

Julie gets off in the spring of 1948, just about the time that Ray Brandon has married radio sensation Charlotte Wilson, which would seem to set the next stage of the drama (a Julie / Ray / Charlotte triangle with a newly single Julie going after a life she never had). Though, maybe this angle wasn't explored as much as the show also quickly married off Susan and Roger (by no later than June, 1948) with Susan soon having a baby, Betty Ann Collins (also voiced by Mary Lansing). I could definitely see Julie being a utility player who could have been the link to Ray's past that he never completely gotten over as well as potentially the meddling mother-in-law/grandmother given her own two children, Betty and Michael, had died in 1947. It's also possible that none of this was as complex as this. 

The Bauers arrive in the show's second year. Jan Carter/Meta Bauer first around June/July, 1948. Eve McVeagh is said to be Jan Carter #2 so I'd be curious who she repalced. Her roommate Mary Leland was also introduced. I'm curious how Leland fit into the bigger story initially. Potential romantic interest for married Dr. Jonathan McNeill? Or replacement as Lurene Tuttle (Mary Leland #2) was earlier Clare Lawrence McNeill? Anyway, the rest of the Bauers are introduced in the fall. I suspect that Jan Carter might have been a career rival for Charlotte Brandon, who's successful program "Radio Stardust" was occasssionally the focus of entire episodes. 

I am also curious if Ray's prior experience with being forced away from his own child had any impact on how he handled himself during the custody trial for little Chucky, who it hadn't dawned on me was named after Dr. Charles Matthews. Ray could have gone either way on this issue. He could have understood Meta's pain given his own experience or been fueled by animosity towards a woman who gave up something he had been deprived of. In the end, I know Charlotte was more sympathetic to Meta, but I imagine her drug problem (that was being stoked by her involvement with her old flame, Larry Lawrence, in late 1949) would have eventually played into Meta and Ted's favor. 

The "guiding light" figure seems to switch from Dr. Charles Matthews to Dr. Paul Keeler around February, 1950. Matthews is listed in ads for the beginning of February and sometimes beyong, but Keeler is mentioned by the end of the month. Keeler, I believe, fades out in 1953 and I don't think there is a replacement. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To think, in 10 years they would all be gone...

Looking at how TGL ,within a few years, dropped most of the characters and shifted to the Bauers. And people complain about that happening later to soaps in the TV era.

Dorothy Dix at Home seems to have replaced Thanks for Tomorrow and was even more obscure.

Interesting concept that listeners didn't take to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Me when someone asks me to be proper and demure. 
    • This is just a guess but I feel like the fact that they keep mentioning her dead husband is for a reason. We know Martin has a secret that likely involved someone dying. Martin's victim could be Alan which Leslie/Dana either knows about or finds out and she uses that to blackmail the family into letting her crimes slide.  
    • Just thinking how the Ruth/Leticia guest spot really cemented how Days had changed. Stunt casting with a campy/comedy character in a 'wacky' storyline was something that a few years previously would have been completely out of place on Days (and most other soaps for that matter).
    • I am interested to see how they handle Leslie/Dana down the road. If she continues in this path, it would be unrealistic to have her around. Like other shows have done this with a 'villian' character and ended up with people looking stupid putting up with someone they detest. Another thought-could they be building up to a murder story? Maybe Les/Dan will be left in a coma and we will have a whodunit with several characters as suspect. It would also be a chance to redeem her I wonder how long the show will go w/o resorting to soap cliche stories-twins,switched at birth, murder mystery, long lost child etc
    • Yeah, Martin really did make me laugh when him and Smitty jumped up to drag Leslie out. I am interested in seeing how this fallout will impact his storyline as well. Especially since he is so protective regarding his family/family's image. I am interested in seeing how he will interact with Eva for the time being, they did have a warmer interaction earlier on once they met. But he seems to have doubts about her possibly being Ted's right now. I wonder how long it might take for him to come around with her. I could see the younger generation warming up to her quicker than the older ones. Though of course I think there will be anger/tension for a while regarding the reveal and her role in it. Perhaps Naomi/Chelsea will ease up on Eva first then eventually Martin/Kat might down the line. I really do love Nicole. I'm glad that DD is playing her. She really is the heart of the family and also agree the show. She is so easy to root for and I'm looking forward to seeing how things work out for her. I am enjoying the development of most of the characters on this show. I enjoy most of them including Bill with his trifling self lol. I do feel that Bill's love for his daughters is genuine and that gives him some depth. A few of the characters I don't care for that much (like Bill, Ashley, Vanessa). I wasn't too big on Andre at first, but I am warming up more to him as the actor is settling into the role. I like most of the characters on this show. Also, I am interested in seeing what happens if Eva indeed goes and lives with the new doctor that was introduced. I could see this adding another layer to her story, maybe she will become more vixen-ish, on what type of relationship they end up having. And/or maybe she will end up becoming more hardened as she deals with being an outcast, especially if she falls out with Leslie as well. I think that AM will do a good job of showcasing the different layers of this character as she deals with the fallout of the affair/paternity reveal.
    • @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

      This is like sex to a beat ... Britney & Michael  https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJNZiyjucCi/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link  
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Got another sad news from the Bahamian community (not a celebrity)  https://www.instagram.com/p/DJMSrYCgyes/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ== Former Bahamian Senate President J Henry Bostwick, Husband of former 1st Bahamian Female Cabinet Minister Dame Janet Bostwick is dead yesterday on his 86th birthday.    Thanks and for those who've aren't familiar with the talk shows in The Bahamas on this thread here, his talk show named The Freedom March with Dr Rodney Moncur that airs on ILTV and The Beat 103.5 FM Nassau every weekday afternoons. IIRC, he suffered a illness before he died.  Here's the link for his final taping of the show before his death: https://ewnews.com/this-is-powerful-rodney-moncurs-final-sign-off/
    • (video, sound up) https://www.instagram.com/p/DIopBYDOGwy/ April 19, 2025 theonlydaphneeduplaix I’m not a fan of running. I’m not a fan of biking. So instead, I do what I love to get me revved up!!! . What that 20 minute warm up always looks like for me. What do you love that gets your body moving? LET’S GO!!!!!!! #DanceItOut #NoExcuses #FitOverFourty #TakeYourBodyBack #FindWhatGetsYouMoving     .           .
    • One thing I thought about is if Hayley will have a reaction to Bill threatening to kidnap and sell a baby. That's another level of viciousness and with her just having thought she was pregnant it might make her feel some type of way.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy