Members alwaysAMC Posted February 9, 2009 Members Share Posted February 9, 2009 OMG I almost 'Chit' my pants laughing so hard here at work!!!!! You're too much...and I LOVE it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members R Sinclair Posted February 9, 2009 Members Share Posted February 9, 2009 Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ChitHappens Posted February 9, 2009 Members Share Posted February 9, 2009 My opinion is just that, my opinion. And it isn't any more precious than anyone elses. If you can talk about the hack writers ad naseum, why can't I simply state that AMC has as many non talented pretty people as Trassions? I don't get it. I enjoy your posts, and I agree with just about all of them. What I don't enjoy is that you think if it doesn't come from you, it holds no validity. Is that really fair, and is acting all superior to other posters how you get off (you do that as regularly as you diss the writers)? Just curious. Oh, and for clarification - I watched 2 1/2 of the eppies. ANDREA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted February 9, 2009 Members Share Posted February 9, 2009 No offense, but this really makes no sense, considering the history of star trading between ABC and CBS, especially over the last couple of years. Several current AMCers spent time on CBS, and vice versa, so I don't see how the differences are defined by what network they're on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ChitHappens Posted February 9, 2009 Members Share Posted February 9, 2009 No offense taken. I see it differently, but I do appreciate your civil response. ANDREA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members skyejames Posted February 9, 2009 Members Share Posted February 9, 2009 Actually " hack writers " is a cliched , blanket term that R Sinclair never uses . She has given Pratt his due on a number of occasions . I think aM has improved over the 7 yrs on the show as anyone would . Loved her ringlets and seeing the original model of which she was such a pale imitation last year . Kane women can`t be .acquiescent molls imho . Yes , that banner ( especially the rider ), was well worth logging on for . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members R Sinclair Posted February 9, 2009 Members Share Posted February 9, 2009 Okay. Cool. This was pointless. To each his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Rhiannon Posted February 9, 2009 Members Share Posted February 9, 2009 I remember Andrea posted here awhile back under another user name then disappeared, what made me recognize her posts is how she signs her name at the end of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.