Jump to content

DAYS: Susan Seaforth Hayes' debut script from 1968 now online!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

In celebration of Susan Seaforth Hayes' 40th anniversary with "Days of Our Lives", Susan's debut script from 1968 is now available for the first time ever online! Susan taped her first episode exactly 40 years ago this week (December 3, 1968). The episode aired on December 11, 1968. See how Julie was re-introduced to the show, after being gone from Salem for over ten months. Plus take a look at the special pictorial tribute to the four Julies (Charla Doherty, Kathy Dunn, Cathy Ferrar and Susan Seaforth Hayes). The first half of Susan's debut episode is up now. The second half will be added later this week. All that and more at http://www.jason47.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

What a remarkable tribute.

And, everything about that script made we want to "see" MORE. Tom's hesistance with his grand-daughter. Alice as the warmer go-between. Julie's obvious emotional manipulation of her grandmother. But that ENDING at the first half was remarkable! I always wondered why David was a BANNING...and now I understand it.

This was SO Bill Bell, in such a good way.

It would be great to actually see the performances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ooh, that script was facinating to read, and I agree with MarkH, it is so Bill Bell.

Also, reading the credits, I notice Frank Pacelli was one of the directors on Susan's first episode. He would later be one of Y&R's most legendary directors of course, and H. Wes Kenney would of course later be EP of Y&R.

Only Bill Bell and Pat Falken Smith were listed as writers on that script, which would never happen today. Also, the fact that Susan's first episode was taped three days before it aired tells us about how much production has changed over the years.

Great tribute, Jason!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks Jason. I loved that.

Jason did you see the Top 300 couple resutls over at my history site. Days placed 32 couples in the Top 300 including 4 in the Top 15.

The results can be seen at: http://s15.zetaboards.com/SoapsWeb/forum/3003227/

Also at the site Days did okay in the Best of the Best and The Webbie Awards we did earlier this year too.

The Best of the Best Results are seen here: http://s15.zetaboards.com/SoapsWeb/topic/6516759/1/

The Webbie Awards can be seen here: http://s15.zetaboards.com/SoapsWeb/forum/3002937/

Days got 17 nominations and won 7 in The Webbie Awards which honored the best in soaps of all time.

I know what a big Days fan you are and wouldn't sure whether you saw them or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Vee,

I think later writers haven't quite know what to do with the way too early aging of Scotty Banning who was last played by Rick Hearst making him roughly the same age as the deaged Mike Horton is supposed to be old enough to be his father too.

The writers really screwed up when they aged him as they did. And it has really hurt the use of the characters of David and Scotty and I even heard one of the writers or actors say several years ago that it was best to leave them off the canvas because of that mistake.

Sadly in a show that constatly screws around with ages they see it better to leave him off then use the characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that the aging of David Banning and Mike Horton did damage the structure of the show.Julie was only about 26 when David became an adult,so she then had to be assumed to be 10 years older and a motherand a few years later,a grandmother which meant the character of Julie was affected.

This is my beef with SORASing-it damages the show long term.If David and Mike were allowed to age more realistically,they would have become leading characters in the early 80's and carried the show through that decade.That would have allowed Julie/Bill/Mickey to have been more vital as parental characters at that time.

Hope and then Jennifer would have been the new young characters in the late 80's/early 90's.

Days should have made Sandy Horton and Steve Olsen the young characters in the 70's.Those 2 characters(Horton grandchildren)were always afterthoughts.

Steve could have played out the David story with Trish and Valerie and Sandy could have been the Marlena character(with a few adjustments).Imagine Deidre Hall as Sandy!The twin story could still have happened.Maybe Kitty gave one child away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Y&R 1976 Pt 2 Bill is overjoyed when Jill arrives home with grandson. But Kay is furious and checks into legal action, only to find that there are no grounds (the check was returned). Brock Reynolds, Kay’s son from her first marriage, convinces her she can be the baby’s godmother and provide for him out of love.  But just as she’s starting arrangements to do this a legal petition arrives stating that Phillip Chancellor Foster is a rightful heir to and is now claiming his share of Phillip Chancellor’s estate. Jill has to do this, as the Foster family’s finances are now more precarious than ever. In fact, Liz, unable to get her factory job back, has secretly started working for Kay as her housekeeper. Jill explains to Kay that she has to do this for her baby’s sake but will drop the suit immediately if Kay puts it in writing that she will provide for them. Kay, however, retorts that Jill is the one who can’t be trusted—after all, she went back on her agreement to let Kay have the baby. Despite her attorney’s advice to work out an out-of-court agreement, Kay — insists on seeing this through. When Jill takes her little son to Phillip’s grave -on the Chancellor estate, Kay runs her off the property. In court, the geneticist testifies that Phillip could have been the baby’s father, but that Brock could have been, also. Jill then testifies that Phillip was the only man she was ever intimate with, and then only once; that Phillip decided on an immediate divorce from Kay and marriage to her, Jill, so that his baby could have his legal name. But Kay’s lawyer brings up the “dead-man statute,” which holds that conversations with a deceased person are not admissible as evidence because he can’t defend himself. When the  judge upholds this statute, Jill comes close to being held in contempt of court.  Brock takes the stand and substantiates Jill’s testimony that although he and Jill lived together for a time before her marriage to Phillip, they were never initimate. But the judge rules in favor of Kay; little Phillip’s claim is rejected. Jill emotionally tells the judge he has denied a child a decent life and a man  his dying wish.   Brad is told by Dr. Snapper Foster,his brother-in-law that his condition, nephritis of the optic nerve, is stable. The optic nerves are still swollen, but since his headaches have stopped he should continue his cortisone treatment. Brad is still firmly insistent that Leslie not be told.  From the moment they meet, Lance and Laurie charge the air around them with static. They find each other arrogant and egotistical, but when Lance needs a date for his trip to London, he calls Laurie, and she accepts. The pilot of Lance’s private plane cryptically suggests that Laurie turns his boss on because she seems turned off by him. This seems to hold true for Laurie, too. By the end of their London stay, Lance and Laurie have come to a better understanding of each other. Lance tries to tell her that, with talent of her own, she should not be jealous of Leslie. She tells him she has a book coming out, but it won’t be published under her own name. She explains further that she was an outgoing child and her parents didn’t understand that she needed as much attention as the introverted Leslie did. (Laurie has always felt she existed in Leslie’s shadow. Les is married to the man Laurie wanted, and is a successful concert artist, with the fame and recognition Laurie has tried so desperately to achieve. Laurie’s first book, a sexploitation novel, was a failure, and this new book is a novel based — on Leslie’s nervous breakdown and recovery—something Leslie is trying to put behind her.) Gwen Sherman, now Sister Magdellen, will soon take her final vows, but still feels God holds her past against her, because nobody could possibly believe that a prostitute could be pure enough to become a nun. She finds her accidental meetings with Greg Foster (they were once in love) increasingly meaningful to her, and she begins to dream of Greg holding her in his arms. Finally, in torment and uncertainty, she tells the Reverend Mother she’s leaving the convent. But on the day of her release, Greg arrives with one of the convent orphans unconscious in his arms.The boy had fallen from a fence outside. When the  boy, Ramon, who had not spoken a word since his arrival, comes to, asking for Sister Magdellen, Gwen sees this as a sign from God and accepts her vocation. She will take her final vows and then enter nurses’.  training.  Stay tuned...
    • I was just about to compose a post where I mention this period AW reminds me of JFP's  time on GL (1993-95) where it just reeked of cynicism and desperation. OR ATWT during Black and Stern. The common denominator is P&G. They allowed this stuff to go on.
    • I think the first 4-5 years have many strong spots, some beautiful writing, and I didn't find it that hard to watch, but one of the main issues with the show for me - and this just gets worse - is many of the characters we are told to root for I find extremely unlikeable. 
    • I don't see the people who were brought into AW around 1986 as being that different from JFP, but I don't feel like going back and forth either.
    • Agree to disagree. I think they cared. I think at times fans underestimate both the creative types & the execs. Certainly there can be specific times & specific people when ego & hubris are huge issues. But, basically, and most of the time the people involved very much want things to work. I'm not saying you don't have your Brian Frons or even your JFPs & your Susan D. Lees. We know at the end Chris Goutman had lost his way.
    • Pure bull, those scenes were.ere! The whole Liam story is going to end in disaster, just like Brad's other stories.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Joey and Vanessa's scenes are boring. Get Vanessa away from him. Anita and Eva scene was great too! Lots of good scenes in today's episode.
    • I really hope the next steps with the show are building up/out family or story for both Mona and Shanice. Mona has always struck me as prime real estate for a proper family setup.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy