Jump to content

April 7-11, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I am changing my mind and commenting further because I looked back (which I shouldn't have done).

There happen to be primetime shows that last more than a couple of years. It is very difficult to maintain the same level of creativity for years and some shows happen to jump the shark seasons before they go off the air, but there are some shows that maintain a fairly decent level until they end.

Soaps still have a lot of habitual viewers who may be watching more out of nostalgia than for quality. Even with that, they still lose a number of viewers each year and will continue to do so.

The rushing would change but that still doesn't mean they would produce a great product. Since GH basically features the same three characters every day then why bother balancing that out for a weekly show? IA that it is hard work to be a good soap writer but good is a matter of perception. Soaps are formulaic and nowadays there seems to be a lot of borrowing from movie plots and the results can be noticeably bad.

Not if compared to ensemble casts such are on medical or legal dramas. Characters and story lines have to be balanced and some have managed to do that successfully. If daytime writers are trying to keep it fresh and innovative then they would appear to have a harder time since they have to do this for five shows a week. However, they mostly seem to be following a formula and on GH it's more a series of events than complete follow through on a story all the way from start to finish. That is precisely why the writing is lazy to me. The dialogue tends to be repetitious and there is little to no progress in cases where there should be and lightning progress where more time is needed.

So are you saying there isn't such a thing as the FCC? You do realize that cable tv has more leeway than public tv?

What's good writing to you may seem like poor lazy writing to other people. There are viewers who have watched GH for decades and can't tell you the names of any of the writers. Your theory on hate for Guza would not hold any water with them or explain why some of them have tuned out and will continue to tune out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I may as well respond to this as well.

No, I didn't miss it. Maybe you didn't get the gist of what I was saying. GH is not unpredictable at all. It's pretty formulaic and I don't consider not knowing specifically who is going to die anything mysterious or unpredictable or even spell binding. The only time a death would be shocking to me is if it were any of the three characters on heavy rotation on the show.

I don't think that GH is popular on most boards because of any unpredictable mob events or the writing style. Most of what goes on in discussion on boards is about who is with whom and who people would like to see together or hate for specific characters. If boards were around in the eighties the discussion would probably have been more about the plot lines on the show including romances. Today it's mostly fighting from battling couple fan bases or unified complaining about female characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wales2004"...sorry i couldn't reply to you sooner. as i was out of town. but it's obvious were not gonna Agree on the subject. so I'm gonna cut this short instead of wasting 10 minutes of my time posting a huge message that will get me nowhere. its' been fun chatting with you and expressing each others opinions. cya next week,. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy