Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

How Tristan Rogers would set up a soap

Featured Replies

  • Administrator

http://www.tristanrogers.com/gb/gbook.php

How would I set up a soap?

In reading posts I have made in the past you may have figured out some of it. But not all. Here goes. And remember, it is after all, just my opinion.

As you all know by now, I am a big fan of the Web. As such I would start by developing my soap around a Web broadcast in a ten minute format. I would craft this along a typical three act structure and draw a fine line between a plot driven and a character driven sub-structure. Personally I have always felt the balance between plot and character should be even. As the show develops you are going to find one part, or the other, will try and take over. This happens when a character emerges as being dominant or the plot becomes more interesting than the characters. And so keeping the balance becomes important and something to be vigilant about.

When it comes to the subject matter for the show itself, the selection should be up-beat and hip. Something that can “crossover” and interest a broad demographic. Yes, it’s important to cater to the demands of sponsors, but I have never understood why this has to be at the outright exclusion of certain age groups. And so we look for something that is going to attract the publics interest. Like a show centered around a film company, television channel, talent agency, advertising agency, cosmetic company etc. Anything that tends to have a foot in something glamorous or something that is “seemingly glamorous”.

Then, and here comes the traditionalist in me, I bring in your atypical wealthy family to anchor the whole thing. I have always believed in this element because of the wide range of flexibility it offers a producer and writers. The Quartermaine’s, the Buchannan’s, the Carrington’s, the Ewing’s all bring a wonderfully rich and compelling “crazy luster” to a soap. Well, they used to anyway. I still believe this is an idea that’s time hasn’t come. And at the core of the family we have the “dysfunctional head” in the fine tradition of “JR” but about five stages further on. In today’s soaps JR is about as threatening as a kid who steals hub caps. Ironically, when GH unlocked Robert’s “darker side” I saw the character in a whole different light. He still had the charm and the humor, but cloaked in a “dark veneer” that could be turned loose at anytime. This was another character and one with plenty of possibilities. It gave me food for thought.

I would like a show five times a week, for 10 minutes an episode, that at the start of each week begins with the resolution of a cliffhanger, and the gradual build to another one. As it’s Web based it can be replayed many times, but the whole idea here is to work out the bugs and establish a system. With the immediacy the Web offers you’re going to find out soon enough whether your show plan is sound. There are a dozen other elements I have to bring in here, but this is the basic plan. The production value would need to be high and as such the budget would need to justify that. After it got to a place where the cast, crew and production staff felt “it was ready”, and it’s hard to say how long that would take, I would take it to Cable and expand the format from 10 to 30 minutes. More than once a week. Developing the show on the Web first, brings your costs down and gives you access to a much larger audience. I also like the “closeness” that is generated with the audience through the Web, however, I would keep the Web version going and structure it to compliment the Cable show.

There is one other part to this that actually needs to be put in place first. I am optimistic that will happen soon.

I have solved some, but not all of the problems and I‘ve been working on this for sometime. This may not be what you expected, but my feelings move towards starting with a new idea. In this way everything to do with the show is new, and is accepted as such by the cast and production crew, and is given the “benefit of the doubt”. Every element is given a chance to prove itself. If it can’t be made to work, change it.

My plan eliminates stepping into someone else’s shoes and being expected to “hold the ladder steady”. As I have said before, the task of taking over the reins of a show with forty plus years of history is a serious undertaking. Gloria’s tenure at GH was a unique one. The show was already slated for cancellation and she had nothing to lose, so she went for it.

So there you have it.

Tristan

--------------------------

Added: January 6, 2008

  • Replies 3
  • Views 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Member

10 minutes? That's even less time than many soaps got on radio! Then again, that's the maximum length of a YouTube video. He seems to be as invested in a FORMULA as everyone else in television. That's a recipe for success, not a creative concept. Whether the characters are glamorous or wealthy, I just want engrossing stories. Must every pitch be about forcing the public to gorge on images of rich and beautiful people so they can hate their lives in comparison? If Gloria Monty could spice up the genre when the advertisers weren't expecting her to, why can't it be done when they have meddlesome ideas?

Edited by stenbeck212

  • Member

I really like Tristan Rogers but Stenbeck212 is totally correct, Tristan is focused on a Formula rather than a creative concept. He's actually created a production model which is fine but it isn't anything new. Tom Green (the comedian who used to be married to Drew Barrymore) innovated the internet to TV concept years ago and I'm sure he wasn't the first one either.

Tristan's model is a good one but it would really take the demise of every other soap in order to work. Audiences are only going to change their viewing habits when they don't have any other options left.

I don't disagree with his belief that an internet based or cable soap would need a wealthy family to anchor it. If you look at the really successful American soaps that have existed for 20+ years they are all well heeled. In Britain the inverse is true. It's a cultural thing I suppose.

  • Member
I don't disagree with his belief that an internet based or cable soap would need a wealthy family to anchor it. If you look at the really successful American soaps that have existed for 20+ years they are all well heeled. In Britain the inverse is true. It's a cultural thing I suppose.

It's probably because we have the idea that hard work can bring wealth. Over there you're born into royalty or you're not.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.