Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Clearly, they are trying to make Palin the attack dog, but IMO, having her come out of the gate attacking so heavily was just a way of covering for her lack of expertise and people are going to pick up on that. I think all the nasty attacks Guiliani and Palin threw out tonight are going to turn a lot of people off. They came off as so angry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know the shi*ts about that statement was that Obama's stance on torture is no different than McCain's. Both oppose it. I really dislike politicians just saying things whether it has any basis in fact or not. There are two things I actually admire about McCain. One is he voted against the marriage act and took the Republican hits and two is that he has consistently opposed torture. What the hell was Palin talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's why I didn't bother watching. I read a few days ago that she was excited about how Obama was doing until she was offered the VP job so I can't begin to take her seriously when it comes to him.

She can laugh at community acrivism but since she's vying to be a leader of all Americans then mocking it is the same as mocking them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. Paul Begala made an interesting point tonight when analyzing this speech. This speech was delivered to the hard right base of the republican party, I think that is quite clear. Paul basically said any campaign that is focusing in on its core base in September, is a losing campaign.

The Rep. base is not nearly as energized as the Democratic base..... a new poll today had 62% of Dems as opposed to barely 40% of Rep. who were enthusiastic about voting this year. Palin appeals to those Bush bible thumpers and she may yes appeal to some, but at the end of the day John McCain is at the top of the ticket, and McCain is not well regarded by the core base of the Rep. party. I expect there will be a bounce in the polls for McCain-Palin after this convention, but once we got on the campaign trail, on the stump, off the cuff and debates, I feel that this McCain-Palin ticket won't know what hit them.

For the first time I am now fully confident that Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is definitely your prerogative if you want to joke about the conservative right being Nazis. It seems to me that you were implying that republicans are bigots (all be it jokingly). I did not intend to imply that you were one. Thanks for your defense of my right to speak, it says a lot about our fellow posters that it was even needed.

What's with all of the angry posts tonight? (from everyone). I gave all of the democrats props during their convention. (check back). You guys seem to want to tear down every single statement that was put out by tonight's speakers.

This thread seems to have diverged a great deal from the issues we face in this election. I've always believed the last measure taken when losing a debate is losing your cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe I'm wrong. I watched a feature earlier this week where they interviewed the men who were held captive with McCain. At the end, they said one thing they all, including McCain, believed was that torture was not good. People who are being tortured will say anything so it does not provide information. Also, if Americans torture, then Americans can be tortured, they said. I assumed McCain also opposed torture.

By he way, I do not support McCain for president, but the man went through hell.

One thing I've noticed about the GOP speeches is that they are all cookie cutter. We could all sit here and right one because they have little basis in fact. It's just buzz words, liberal, bureaucracy, taxes. Oh well.

One final note. I started laughing when Palin said as governor she got rid of things the state of Alaska should not be paying for. Then there was this pause, and I though hmmm, yeah, she got rid of her brother-in-law and the man who would not fire her brother-in-law. :lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy