Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I dont believe in Global Warming....:::ducks:::: :::runs::: :::hides as guest in this thread:::::

Seriously...I just don't see it. The farmer's almanac, for example..is calling for a twenty year cooling period and many scientists believe this will happen as well.. Just this week the Northeast US is experiencing record cold temps.. I just dont believe the planet is getting hotter..

With that being said..Do I believe that humans have polluted the planet?...Yes

Do I believe we should be more concious of the enviornment?...Of course...

But I am worried about the tornado that is supposed to hit Pine Valley, PA in October. That is not really a normal weather pattern for this time of year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm shocked. Horrified. Flabbergasted. :o

Honestly, Casey. I can't say that I - or probably anyone else that has been reading this thread - am very surprised that you believe that. Really.

But ya know, there are some of your friends on the right that believe Global Warming is an issue.

Global Warming 101 - As seen through the eyes of fellow Republicans

I can't believe I just posted a link to a conservative web site. That has to be a first for me.

It is interesting how you're basing your entire argument on the Farmer's Alamanc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Either that or the poll is representative of the public. The goals isn't to get a samplw that is 50/50, it is to get a sample that is representative of the public as a whole.

I doubt that poll is correct either, but I believe it is also the same poll that was touted over by some when it was McCain 54 to Obama 43 after the convention.

I imagine the poll is either voting age, or registered voters, but not likely voters and that is the reason why it is so much different than others. Edited to add, most people do identify themselves as Dems. Unfortunately from my point of view, they are also unlikely to vote.

What is troublesome to me as a Obama supporter is the demographics in these polls. It shows McCain ahead, and comfortably so, among demographic groups that traditionally are more likely to vote. If you look at the undecided, they seem to be the groups that I would expect to vote R, regardless of the candidate or election. JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, not when compared to McCain. I did not like it when he launched scummy ads to get back at McCain.

I wish he had picked Hillary for VP only because she is a woman and I like her. I much much prefer Obama to McCain though.

By the way, nice post on the bias. :lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, you know Jess, I don't know how solid McCain's Republican/conservative base is. There are some in the conservative media who are starting to turn on him.

Joe Biden just gave a rousing forteign policy speech. Wonderful job.

That is when he's at his best..........not running off at his mouth and saying stupid [!@#$%^&*].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Everyone can shoot me for bringing this up again but some pages back Casey made reference to a trial being set on that whole Berg nonsense and I still haven't seen or heard any reports from any of the major networks' news divisions that Obama is slated to testify....nor have I seen or heard mention of this.

And again shoot me for this.....but I don't have a problem with Biden at all. If I didn't look at this thread, I wouldn't know he said anything at all.

I get why some people think Clinton would have made a better choice but I don't see where she'd be a better fit for Obama.

Do I think the best two candidates in the country are running for President? No. I'm not sure who I think the best candidates would be but I do believe in this vast country there are two better candidates than McCain and Obama. I do, however, think that Obama is a better choice than McCain by a long shot.

When I hear elements of the media say that Obama needs to roll up his sleeves and prove that he relates to the people blah blah blah, it makes me wonder if they truly believe that McCain relates to all the people.....but then it depends on who they believe the people are and whether or not they've taken a good look at the face of America.

I think Obama matches up with the face of America in more categories than McCain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

These two comments both speak to the MSM "ignoring" certain aspects of this election..The lawsuit against Obama and Biden's numorous gaffes. Do you think for one split second that if Palin put her foot in her mouth..it wouldn't be the headline of the day.?

I may be wrong, but even if a frivalous lawsuit was brought up on McCain, I believe it would get coverage...no matter how silly the charges..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm going to remark on these first. Then on to Casey and the "fallacy" of Global Warming, according to him. <_<

I can understand your concern, Jess. However, I really believe that Obama has inspired young people like no candidate has since RFK. And come election day, these will be the people that will determine the outcome. I think the tradition will be changed this time around.

They've never been that crazy about a McCain presidency. He got a boost from SP because she plays better to the conservatives and Christians. But that's starting to wear off now.

Don't worry, I'm not going to shoot you. :P I haven't seen anything either. It just proves what utter bullshit it is.

I love Hillary Clinton. I would have been very happy if she would have been on the ticket with Obama. Personally, I don't think she wanted to be VP, even if Obama would have asked her. And as much as I admire the woman, there would be a tremendous hurdle to overcome with her image to the average American. If you believe the polls, she has a much higher negative rating the positive. I'm not saying I agree with it, but it is a reality. The conservatives would have had a field day - not only with her, but her husband. They would have dug up every little thing on him that they didn't while he was President. You can take that to the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're kidding right...her Bush Doctrine definition made it all the way to SNL. Do they even have anyone playing Biden??.. or Obama for that matter??

Where did you hear that? That sounds kind of silly..

I think Palin's interviews with Hannity and Gibson have had the highest ratings so far this year with election related coverage..(Behind Obama and O'Reilly)..She has done two very high profile interviews and is slated for another tonight..What "thoughts" from Palin have yet to be covered?

BTW, How many interviews has Biden done since the DNC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not going to dig too far into your can of worms, Casey. But I just have to say something.

First of all, citing John Coleman about the global warming "scam" is like citing Rupert Murdoch's claim of Kerry and the Swift Boat broadcasts. They are both firmly entrenched in GOP pockets.

Are there any credible, mainstream, non-biased organizations that agree with your opinion? I mean, I have an article from National Geographic that supports my position.

Global Warming - Fast Facts

Unless you would consider them biased?

We will have to agree to disagree, but I couldn't rebute your posts on this article without making my case as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You are going to be so proud of me because I agree.  I kept thinking why is Sonny/Mo getting all the dialogue and gate keeping everyone's feelings when there are 3 other capable actors in these scenes?  Ned should have told Sonny to shut up lol. I am fine with Sonny getting a reaction, but he got 90% of the airtime for his reaction.  I don't even think it's mental health that's keeping his job.  MB wouldn't get this much time on screen if it was a pity thing.  Frank is too afraid to cut Sonny because of fan reaction.  I know there aren't any Sonny fans here, but I do think there are Sonny fans out there (besides me) lol.
    • I've been looking at the ratings during and after each head writer switch.  The ratings during Marcus' tenure (Oct 74 to April 75) were very good but at first not quite as high a Upton's (who was there six months prior. Marcus left when Mary Hartman was picked up as she was a creator and head writer). I've watched Marcus' interviews on Youtube; she discusses most of the soaps she worked on. She liked the money; she's not all warm and fuzzy about writing for them. She loved nighttime genres that gave her writing more flexibility than soapy dramas. But she was good at writing soaps.  By April 75, SFT was no.2 in the ratings behind ATWT. O'Shea was next (lasted 18 months) and in May 75, SFT high No. 1. When O'Shea left the show as still in the top five. O'Shea moved to OLTL in 77? but not as head writer so not sure why she left SFT. The Corringtons were the safest bet to keep long term. They needed to change direction by 1980 as the ratings were  dropping but still very solid 6s/low 20s share). They should have expanded the show to an hour and given the Corringtons some direction and more budget. One has to wonder about two people who were with the show for a long time: Mary Ellis Bunim was promoted to EP when she was about 28, amazingly and a woman! She as talented but she went through at 11 head writer changes if she started in 1974.  Here's her list of writers: Theodore Apstein (January 1974 – May 1974) 5 mo Gabrielle Upton (May 1974 – November 1974) 6 mo Ann Marcus (October 1974 - April 1975) 6 mo Peggy O’Shea (April 1975 – November 1976) 18 mo Irving Elman (with James Lipton) (November 1976 – Summer 1977) 9 mo Robert J. Shaw with Charles/Patti Dizenzo (August 1977 - Spring 78) 6-9 mo? Henry Slesar (Spring 78 to August 78) 3-4 mo? Corringtons (August 1978 to May 1980) 1 yr/9mo Linda Grover/John Porterfield (May 1980 to mid July 1980) 3 mo. Gabrielle Upton (July 1980 to at least through March or April) Harding Lemay April to June 81 writers' strike Don Chastain (Summer 1981 writers' strike - replaced by Ellis/Hunt Dec 81 or Jan 82) Then Fred Bartholemew comes in when Bunim goes to ATWT (Oct 81?) and he brings in Ellis Hunt for the NBC switchover, they lasted 11 months. Mary Stuart is the other mystery to me: how was she to work with? Did she instigate many of the writer firings? Was she not involved at all. No other P&G show went through this kind of frenetic change. (The Doctors might be a close second but wasn't on as long and not P&G).
    • I'm getting the sense that something happened between Anita and Dante Green that wasn’t exactly copacetic, to say the least. I wonder — did he promise her fame and fortune as a solo artist, and then attack her when she rebuffed his advances? I hope it’s not a long-lost child plot lurking out there for her. Maybe she left behind an sibling in poverty or something instead, back in Cabrini-Green/Chicago. It does seem like neither Tracy nor Sharon’s solo careers turned out the way they dreamed — both ended up singing at City Wineries. I still think Leslie is connected to the Duprees — maybe her mother is Sharon, and she's going after the Duprees because she believes she could’ve had their lifestyle if things had gone differently for her mom. She does have ties to Chicago. That said, I hope this is the last disguise from her toolbox for a while — I’d hate for that to get played out. But I do wonder if she’s going to use Nicole 2.0 to frame Nicole for something down the line? I’m all for giving Shanice more time on canvas, and I wouldn’t hate it if she and Andre became an item — someone who doesn’t mind being public, unlike Dani. Or I can see Doug finally getting fed up with their arrangement and turning to the nurse for some “relief.” Vanessa was, in a way, telling herself off in those scenes with Ted about his cheating. And I have to say, Keith Robinson’s Ted brings a broader range of emotion than Maurice Johnson’s did — though I think Ted 2.0 is benefitting from better writing than OG Ted, whose arc relied more on MJ’s charisma and physical presence. That said, as someone else pointed out, Keith looks like he’s drowning in the clothes they’ve got him in. Hopefully, they’ve got some better-fitted attire lined up now.
    • They are just right there in your face.  It's hard to not see Ciara's boobs at all times.  And simmer down camera man, this is a family show!! The high school stuff makes it weird.  Physically the actors all look fine together.  It just makes me think Doug needs to find friends his own age.   With Ari at least Doug was under the impression she was over 21. I liked JJ and Eve too lol!
    • Specifically that's Kat & she is, there's no other way to say it except like pulling off a band-aid. She's Chad's "#1 fan" IOW, basically, kinda sorta she's an albatross around Chad's neck.  Kat can turn any conversation into a discussion of Chad & what he ate for breakfast or the most minute of minute things about Chad Duell's life & times.  We hope she's not dangerous. We hope she's just boring. That Chad is not back has lit a fire under her. She's upped her number of posts, which all relate in some way to Chad. Now you know what there is to know about as I said Chad Duell's #1 fan.     
    • The Duh-prees - Count me in as someone who cannot stand Kat’s fashion. No one walks around town dressed like that. And those wigs? Completely immovable. We have incredible wig technology these days—can’t the show find something better? - Vernon’s sermons are total FF material. - It looks like they’re setting up a past drinking habit for Anita (with all the “drowning” references), and maybe even a rape/child plot? Also—remember when Dani was an alcoholic? Lol.   Ted / Nicole / Leslie - Some people are projecting way too much onto OG Ted. Sure, he had screen presence, but his line delivery was pure caricature. He wasn’t menacing or threatening—he was a joke. NuTed may be meek, a bit one-note, and smaller in stature, but his confrontation with Leslie on Friday worked. Also, let’s be real—Bill’s not scary either. Total softie. Couldn’t scare a fly. - The ATWT reference was cute, but wasn’t the Duncan storyline from the ‘80s? Are we supposed to believe Nicole was already practicing back then? Since she said it was her patients who watched… like others pointed out, God forbid she watched herself! - Also: I stand corrected on Leslie. I think she’s starting to make more sense as a character. She’s fearless and provocative—that’s what drives her. I actually loved her mirror scene where Nicole 2.0 made her debut.   The non-Dupree characters - You guys were a bit dramatic about Monday’s show. It just had too many unlikeable storylines crammed into one. That’s all. Also, I stand by what I said about Derek and Ashley—their storyline is totally rom-com coded, and I’m into it. - I’ve developed a soft spot for Doug!!

      Please register in order to view this content

      And I thought that Vanessa ripping into Ted had a subtle layer of self-reprimand to it   - I officially can’t stand André. I don’t buy him as a playboy at all. Same goes for Pamela with her transatlantic accent. It’s such a shame that this is the first character CML had to create… and this is what we got?
    • party pics and vids from Don Diamont's wife Cindy Ambuehl https://www.instagram.com/p/DJ9X--uxnF2/
    • You’re really starting to see panic in the other actors’ eyes as they watch him struggle to get through his lines. There is a shot in yesterday’s episode in which  Swickard is standing behind Mo while he drones on and on, and the younger actor is clearly doing everything he can to hide his “WTF” face.
    • Don posted May 12th for 16th anniv of his B&B debut, and Michele Val Jean replied on May 21st: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJknIr8y4ra/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I just saw this & I liked it. Maybe you will like it too. You do not have to attend every argument you are invited to. It seems to me to be a suitable adage for today's internet.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy