Jump to content

'Transformers II' gets an A-Team of writers


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

"Transformers II" gets an A-Team of writers

By Jay A. Fernandez

Special to The Times

October 10, 2007

Well, DreamWorks and Paramount are finally moving forward with their inevitable "Transformers" sequel, and they've done it by putting an enormous down payment on a unique, blockbuster screenwriting crew. In a deal that could ultimately pay out more than $8 million, the studios have hired Ehren Kruger ("The Ring," "Scream 3") to write the film's screenplay with original "Transformers" scribes Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, whose four credited films have produced $1.4 billion in worldwide box office.

DreamWorks' willingness to agree to a combined team of A-listers, especially at such lofty rates, speaks to the studio's faith in the writers' ability to deliver (it also, one insider notes, effectively discourages the studio from spending more money to hire someone to rewrite their work).

Producer Lorenzo Di Bonaventura and DreamWorks executives had been inviting writers to propose takes on the sequel as early as May, two months before the first film's Independence Day opening. The studio has been looking at the "Transformers" property as an extended saga, with an expansive mythology built into at least two more films.

But Kurtzman and Orci have been jammed with high-profile writing and producing assignments ("Star Trek," "Eagle Eye") and originally passed on writing the sequel to avoid overextending themselves. With returning director Michael Bay looking to keep them involved and no killer pitches forthcoming, last month the studio finally persuaded them by suggesting they team with another writer (for the second film only; Bay has not committed to a third either.)

As producers, Kurtzman and Orci had hired Kruger to pen another DreamWorks project, "Nightlife," and apparently enjoyed the relationship enough to collaborate with him as writers. (Kruger had recently adapted Stephen King's "The Talisman" for Steven Spielberg, a "Transformers" executive producer.)

Even with the added partner, the logistics should prove complicated. The new "Star Trek," which Kurtzman and Orci are producing and writing for Paramount, and "Eagle Eye," which they're producing for DreamWorks, start shooting on the same day next month. And "Fringe," the sci-fi series Kurtzman and Orci sold to Fox TV last week, starts shooting by year's end.

So Kurtzman and Orci will somehow be writing their part of the "Transformers" script while bouncing around three sets. (At least "Fringe" is co-written and co-executive-produced by "Trek" director J.J. Abrams, so lunch breaks on the "Trek" set should prove productive.)

No deadline has been set for the screenplay, though the film does have a release date: June 26, 2009. So the hiring of several writers was less about trying to complete a script before the potential Writers Guild walkout on Nov. 1 than about having access to numerous voices to address the inevitable changes as this behemoth progresses through its years-long development and production process.

Just the same, the three writers are already pooling their ideas to nail down the detailed story line while Bay has begun pulling together some digital pre-visualization robot designs that didn't make it into the first film. An added benefit lost on no one is that with a CGI-heavy film like this, the preliminary work provides an effective cushion if the writers (or directors and actors next summer) do strike -- effects crews can work ahead and compile action sequences during any stoppage.

'Stooges' on hook?

It's enough to make a guy say, nyaaah-aaahh-aahh. . .

With the Farrelly brothers' latest comedy "The Heartbreak Kid" grossing a mere $14 million over the weekend (actually their biggest opening since "Shallow Hal" in 2001, but still a disappointment), their next potential project, "The Three Stooges," may have just taken a mallet to the noggin.

For the last few years, the Farrellys have been trying to get traction on a feature-length update of the comedy trio's 1930s shorts. C3 Entertainment Inc., which holds the licensing rights to the Stooges brand, sold the feature rights to Warner Bros. in March 2001 for the Farrellys to write and produce the movie.

Brothers Peter and Bobby wrote the screenplay with their childhood friend Michael Cerrone, but the project never came together, and Warner Bros. let the rights lapse. So now C3 is shopping the project to several other major studios, including DreamWorks, which just released "The Heartbreak Kid."

The question is whether the anemic opening of "Kid" will affect interest in the Stooges. The screenplay, which Bobby affectionately refers to as "Dumb, Dumber & Dumbest," is constructed of four loosely connected shorts. Although retaining the spirited chaos of the original shorts -- ingenious physical comedy setups/payoffs and witty wordplay that generate endless opportunities for smacks, bonks, doinks and nyuks -- Cerrone and the Farrellys have definitely modernized the edginess of the shenanigans.

One joke has Larry reminiscing about how Sister Bernice caught him in the orphanage bathroom "going No. 3." There are nods to Viagra, Robert De Niro and "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy." (Bobby says they will freshen the references if the project gets momentum; I have their version dated April 30, 2004.)

"Everybody has to appreciate that the guys, when they were doing their thing, pushed the envelope," says Earl M. Benjamin, president and chief executive of C3 and stepson of the last member to join the troupe, Curly Joe DeRita. "The kind of humor you're seeing in that script is the kind of thing that they would have done had they been here today."

The trick has been finding fans of the script in the executive suites who truly get the Stooges' slap shtick. (Benjamin says that he's been asked more than once: "Why is there so much slapping and hitting?") Even with the underwhelming receipts of the Farrellys' recent films, the Stooges have global brand recognition -- the shorts, films and cartoons broadcast in 30 countries. In an industry that now pulls in most of its box office revenue from outside the U.S., that seems like a slam-dunk.

"Somebody asks me probably once a week, 'How come this movie's never been made?' " Benjamin says with a sigh. "I should just press a recording or something. I don't know what to say anymore. It's Hollywood. We just go with the flow."

A sentiment that Moe would find appalling.

Oldie but goodie

Dispatch From the Never Too Late Department:

It's not often that a 90-year-old guy makes Rolling Stone's "Hot List," but this week nonagenarian debut author Millard Kaufman shares pages with cool kids Emile Hirsch, Olivia Wilde and "Juno" screenwriter Diablo Cody, all of whom collectively fall well short of the number of years that Kaufman has survived this whole perverse cosmic gamble.

Kaufman, who was nominated for two screenwriting Oscars in the 1950s ("Take the High Ground!" and "Bad Day at Black Rock"), decided in his late 80s that his screenwriting career just might have stalled. So he tried his hand at a novel instead.

This past week, McSweeney's published "Bowl of Cherries," Kaufman's satire about a prodigious 14-year-old boy abandoned by his father who, while in pursuit of a girl, journeys from Yale to a Colorado farm to a Brooklyn porn studio to, ultimately, a prison in southern Iraq built from human feces.

Along the way, Kaufman throws around 10-dollar vocabulary words such as "steatopygous" and "asseverate" that haven't turned up in a screenplay since Roget sent around his widely derided action spec, "The Bourne Scutellation."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Awesome Yep, you can hook up a VHS player to a smart TV. Alternatively, Amazon sells some VHS to Digital converters that you can use to directly connect the VCR's AV cables  to a USB on a laptop or PC. They cost about 20 bucks. Any questions or need help, DM me!
    • -- "The role of Ted Richardson is now being played by...." I love that throwback to soaps from yesteryear. I know we don't want BTG to be our grandmother's soap, but sometimes Grandma's soaps had it right. -- I was FULLY prepared to dislike Keith D. Robinson as Ted, and I even went through things in my mind that I could say because I was fine with Maurice Johnson and felt bad for him.     However, Robinson was awfully good, especially for Day 1. He's a different Ted, but he's a good actor -- natural and real. People saying Gates "should have gone older" are head-scratchers since Robinson is older than Johnson. -- I expected Bill to be tougher than he was with Dana, THE worst mother of the year on soaps. -- Kat went toe-to-toe in those scenes with Dana. We're all in love with Ambyr/Eva, but Colby/Kat is also killing it. -- Derek and Ashley? I'm turning on Ashley, who can't even pretend to like Derek, let alone love him. Her annoyance with him is overboard, and I'm also annoyed with the show portraying Derek as a Neanderthal -- to the point of putting "Neanderthal" in his dialogue. Every single thing he does annoys Ashley, which makes me wonder what she ever saw in him. I want him away from her. -- Seeing Derek and Ashley in that bed was hilarious. It looks like a single, not something for two grown adults. -- Ashley and Andre are still a no for me -- a big no. I see no reason why he'd be infatuated with her. None. At least Andre got a smile from her, which she didn't have for Derek, even when he wanted them to get a bigger place. Derek, please dodge the bullet.
    •   I LOVED Hennig’s Stephanie. AK is Stephanie in name only. Stephanie was never boring to me.
    • July 2012, Abe organized a gala that was an autism fundraiser in Lexie's honor.  This was the huge event everyone was attending (except Gabi and Melanie in the tunnels).. -- when the gas explosion occurred and the building collapsed.  The "Daysaster" cliffhanger before the Olympics break.
    • I think maybe Andre is subconsciously looking for a caretaker/nurturer in his life to replace his parents. That would explain his attraction to both Ashley (nurse) and Dani (older woman/his aunt's sister). I don't see any chemistry between Ashley and Andre though. In fact Andre and Derek had more chemistry in the pasta night episode than either of them have ever had with Ashley.
    • My only recollection of Ms Felder in Tom Lissanti's book is that she was not well liked backstage, and nobody was aware of rumors that she was fired because of her looks, including the network executive interviewed for the book.
    • a) you would not be sorry, but  b) full episodes from the first half of '89 are hard to find. 
    • Ya see..., that's why I can't watch this show on my own!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm ripping it for being dumb, meanwhile half the episode goes over my head.  Hello pot, I'm kettle.
    • When put very plainly it wouldn't make sense, but you could say that Ashley would prefer someone that can pay his own way without sharing expenses and has more than a working class experience. Andre might want someone more stable and level headed. Of course the issue is that the characters don't match despite the plausibility of a connection making s
    • I am fine with no one mentioning Bob-ette again.  It's frustrating not ever knowing what was up with him truly or why we wasted so much time on that to never get a conclusion.  I am willing to forget it though. Abe being on the board makes more sense to me because of Lexie and Theo.  I think there was a wing dedicated to Autism research or treatment years ago possibly named after Theo and Lexie was the chief of staff at some points and worked there for years.  I could see Abe having interest in the hospital still.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy