Jump to content

Kay Alden's Age?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Knots was an ensemble, but it was centered around Gary and Valene, from Dallas. Joan Van Ark carried that show until LML arrived and had her feeding her children their pets!

I also disagree that JVA's run was cartoonish at Y&R. She added more depth and layers to that role than the one note cartoon Judith Chapman plays. She has chemistry with everyone, was youthful, truly felt like trailer trash and could be a total bitch when she needed, as well as a sympathetic character. I think the role of Gloria has been ruined without her, but she;d never return with LML at the helm.

BTW, yes her husband is said to be just as bad as she is. Lots of reports from major Y&R actors. John Pleshette, an original cast member turned writer, was fired to critiquing one of their scripts. Keep in mind he's the one who got Latham/Lechowick their first major job in Hollywood. They are VILE.

As for budget cuts, I doubt it considering their expensive plot coming up. Plus she's replaced everyone she fired with her friends. The budget is probably in worse shape now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Chris B is right, Y&R's budget has never been an issue, ever. The Bell family and SONY keep it running smoothly with plenty of money, Y&R is the most profitable soap on the air and not the most expensive one to produce (that distinction, sadly, goes to DAYS).

Joan Van Ark has said, on record, that she quit KL because LML and BL made Val 'the village idiot'. Here is a portion of an interview Joan Van Ark gave regarding LML and BL:

JVA: Oh right, right. That one did ask a lot of me. I think the writers tested me with that one. I think they were testing me, sending me up. Val’s going to stir-fry the kids’ pets … how much crazier could she have gotten? But I guess this person from Detroit enjoyed it and that’s what the writers were going for. Maybe he saw it as a fun variation on a constant, repetitive theme.

AS: So you really didn’t like what they were doing with Val at that time.

JVA: No I really didn’t. I’m thinking of two particular writers who liked making fun of Val. Before, I’d go to David Jacobs, who was the creator and executive producer of the show and I’d talk about certain scenes and tweak them, but in this case I didn’t object or confront the two writers … there wasn’t allowed to be a dialogue.

AS: Were these two just two writers? Did you talk to the head writers?

JVA: These were the head writers at the time.

AS: Oh, (Lynn Marie) Latham and (Bernard) Lechowick were the ones you didn’t like. That’s interesting.

JVA (hesitantly): I guess you know the behind the scenes things that were going on then.

AS: Well, I interviewed John Pleshette about a month ago and he couldn’t stand them.

JVA: They came into a show that was established and … I really don’t know if I should be saying this here … but there was a little bit of turning it upside down. God bless ‘em for going on and having successful careers (after Knots) but it became more and more challenging to play Val the way they wrote for her. (http://www.knotslandingonline.com/joan_van_ark_interview.html)

Surprise Surprise that Joan Van Ark quit Y&R when LML came aboard.

Donna Mills also hated LML and BL...she's stated numerous times that the loss of Peter Dunne midway through season 6 of the show (also the time LML and BL arrived) was the worst thing that happened to the show.

I also have no doubt that the Y&R set is not a happy one. Gone are the days when Y&R had a full rehearsal and then a few takes for each scene. Jess Walton noted in a Boston TV interview that now the rehearsals are taped and that 'if they are good enough' they go with the filmed rehearsal and don't film the scene again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Wasn't there talk of them bringing back Rita as Gus' mother at one point? Or something?
    • I think they are a part of the same family, although Carla was never really scheming for the same reasons, and once her double life was exposed, she stopped. 
    • Rachel/Ada, Mona/Erica, a mother/daughter at LOVING, these are all examples of the Agnes Nixon "troublesome daughter/put upon mother" trope. Are Carla/Sadie by any chance one of the pairs that make up this trope? Another thing that these 2 shows might have in common. OLTL had a very strong thematic approach to socioeconomic differences between groups of people. Class differences. AW at an earlier point had this too but to be clear it was not as much as OLTL. So that is a similarity but marginal.  Besides that, I see no other comparable things. Paul Rauch was a very different EP at different shows. Oh, I've thought of one more thing. Using actors from the Broadway stage.  But, realistically that was something all of the NY shows had in common. So I don't think it has any uniqueness between AW & OLTL.  
    • When you look at the period between Sweeps, it's as if they tried to maintain a kind of pace where they had a lot of plates spinning in the air & on their fingertips & the whole goal was nothing but to not drop any of those plates. A version of spinning one's wheels. They're not getting anywhere but they give the appearance of a whole lot of activity. I believe it's all about this appearance. At moments they accidentally hit a chord & something resonates but it is a false event.
    • He found the hidden camera and removed the card 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m not speculating anything, but I admit, I’m getting a little worried about James Reynolds. 
    • I feel like this is what they're doing by creating lots of storylines but their biggest weakness for years is the inability to properly pace these stories and give resolution. A good example now would be the Gio story which has been simmering for months with very little movement. I went from not caring to being invested to not caring again because of how long it's taking for the secret to be revealed. One story like that would be fine but it seems like everything moves at this snails pace on GH. They need to do a better job of rotating the stories so everything isn't in that same treading water phase.
    • However, those of us who watch DAYS have been spoiled. On Peacock there are no preemptions. Not for anything & not in or about any show.  I read somewhere that we Baby Boomers in a way invented instant gratification but then we realized that it was not fast enough.
    • The title track from the follow-up album Hot On the Trail is also co-written by Val Jean:  

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy