Jump to content

PSNS: Friday February 9


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

ranger, why are you being so rude? I enjoyed the episode (which I love Passions, so I enjoy most episodes) and I thought it was the best so far this year because it involved so much of the cast and the plot was moving forward. And then another poster comments on how they liked grown up Endora and you answer with a sarcastic comment. Why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To spread the love, I too must add that this was the BEST "Passions" episode of the new year. Theresa's blackmail, suspense with Rae knowing who the rapist is...Luis' hypnotism session...Sheridan and the hypodermic needle...a TC punch toward julian...Jivy sex...ALL IN ONE DAY?!!

Again, I REGRET DEEPLY not recording this as high quality so it could be a keeper episode.

Sorry, guys, it really WAS that good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to add: stop with the Al suggestions. Tabs already said it's not him. or Julian. So thankfully, we've already shot those guys down.

One thing intrigued me, though, and it was something that was said in this very thread.

the man who wants to hurt luis..who 's helping Sheridan...if it's who I think it is (and anybody will figure it out because only one person in the world would want to hurt Luis, specifically :lol:) what a POW! finale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Vang -- I like how you think . That's EXACTLY who I was thinking. Then again, that wasn't that hard to figure out, with this show, lol. But yeah, it makes so much sense that Antonio should be working to hurt Luis and his relationship with Fancy. Not so much sense why Sheridan would help him. The sheridan factor, for me, is the most intriguing part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy