Jump to content

Freedom of speech?


SpiritualJunkie

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is in response to the thread Danni started. It's unfortunate that I didn't read it earlier because now that I have and want to respond, it's closed.

First, I want to talk about the fact that it got closed. I think it touched on a really interesting issue that should be discussed. Just because it was turning ugly doesn't mean it should have been closed.

Where's the freedom of speech? If you disagree, say why. I realize many people did but closing the thread just ignores the issue and doesn't allow for further discussion. It's a shame.

Now onto what I think...

Yes, racism originated from power relations but Danni, when you say only whites can be racist, you automatically assume that only whites can act, and therefore, be superior to other races. I think that argument is beyond flawed. You make it sound like whites being superior to other races is natural which it isn't. That power relation CAN change. Therefore, a person from any race can be racist.

This isn't just about whites vs. blacks. To make it so ignores all the other ethnic groups out there...which is just self-absorbed and ignorant. If you look within Asia, the Japanese were terrorizing other Asian groups during the Second World War. There was definitely a power relation within the continent and it wasn't whites overpowering blacks...it was Japanese overpowering other Asians.

I agree that just because you take a sociology class on racism doesn't give you the right to stomp on everyone else's opinions and not give it a fair analysis. I watched a film last week called "In a Soldier's Footsteps" and found out one of the corrupt Ugandan government officials has a degree in some area involving human rights. So what's your point?

I agree there is still a huge divide between white/black equalities but blacks have gained far more than other "minorities" such as hispanics, asians, natives, arabs, east indians, etc. For black people to complain that blacks are still not being treated fairly without considering how other minorities are also getting scrap is again, selfish and ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I wish the thread hadn't been closed either. I don't think it warranted such an action because there was a disagreement.

Danni is passionate. In her defense, the truth does not always have to be polite or presented in a nice format, but her facts were true. I digressed on many of her arguments, but on others, I wholeheartedly agreed. I wanted to continue the discussion. A clash of idelogy exists everyday, but if diversity is to be heralded, we should be able to examine our differences.

I wanted to submit the following books of interest that deals with racism:

Breaking the Curse of Willie Lynch: The science of slave Psychology by Alin Morrow

Behold a pale horse by William Coulbert

Ixis papers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I want to add another book to your list that I think directly deals with what Danni has been saying about the differences between "systematic racism" and "racial prejudice"...

"Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?": And Other Conversations About Race by Beverly Daniel Tatum, Ph.D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Ohh, interesting. I instantly gravitated towards her in that episode. Of course I'm already hooked and want to know why she was trying to poison that older lady, but then how did the older lady know to switch the mugs so Susan drank her own poison...  but I have too many timelines I'm watching right now haha.  Oh, Bolger is definitely hot. I didn't realize he was on GL haha. I knew him from OLTL and other primetime stuff.
    • This is a effin shame. Eff Trump and eff the bastards that enable him.
    • I 100% agree but I think this is due to how the show is structured. It's a one family show which means there are no people in her age range that could be used as friends or contemporaries of her. The show definitely needs a second main family. I am glad someone finally said this. Especially now that the cast is gelling in their roles, he stands out like a sore thumb. No energy, no chemistry with anybody. He is just there.  I thought that was odd as well! The previous scene would've worked better as a tag for the credits.
    • That's the one and only Carrie Nye (Mrs. Dick Cavett) as Susan Piper, a deadly realtor. I don't want to spoil a lot if you ever want to see those episodes. She returns as another character in 2003. I think Grant has aged well and he always did a good job at being ripped without going too far, but he was never entirely my cup of tea either. I did think John Bolger was hot.
    • Totally agree. KKL looks great! It makes the Widge groveling so bizarre. Brooke needs to leave FC and with $B's/Liam's funding launch a rival fashion house with Hope, Rick, Katie and a secret designer. The best scenario is that Rick has been absent because he's been with very much alive C2, who is revealed on the runway as the secret designer. It'll never happen because B&B is comfortable just focusing on FC and the Forresters Marones v. Logans. But it'd been so much more interesting if the Spencers/Logans united.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Haha that scarf thing did go on a bit too long, very odd. And what a young Rick!  I know this is an unpopular opinion, but I just never got the physical appeal of Grant Aleksander, but he's definitely a great actor. Who is the older lady around the 8:30 mark, and also ends the episode, alone and in pain? She seems like a really interesting character. I love the smoky voice and sultry, snaky vibe she seems to have.
    • I can't remember exactly but I think she lives in or is part of the cottage story with Carrie. Carrie poisons her in this episode.  I forgot Teresa was on the show. (I see that AI is insisting she wasn't - well they're wrong) Poor Maeve. I can how even she had her limits. 
    • It pisses me off that the other Duprees are making this incident all about them as well. They are playing a family of victims, acting as if Ted cheated on all of them. They should be supportive, but not like this. I have a family that makes anything that happens to me personally all about them, and seeing the same thing on TV is rage-inducing.
    • There are the makings of good Emmy reels in these past couple of episodes, but the industry is still going to favor even the most mediocre stories and performances on the older soaps. And with the pressure from the government over race I can see the academy shutting out Beyond The Gates to avoid criticism from the administration and the far right media.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy