Jump to content

DAYS: October 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

There were some good moments in the episode for sure.  I agree they never really fleshed out Fiona enough for me to understand her motives.  She says she was miserable for years and that's why she drank, but she is very well put together and doesn't truly seem like a lush.  What was she doing all those years when Xander wasn't speaking to her?  Is she evil?  Is she just someone who makes bad decisions?  It's another decent storyline with horrible execution.

Yeah, this Chad storyline is dumb.  I feel ya, Billy Flynn.

You would think Mark would look at FAbby's DNA and realize Kayla's DNA was entirely different than the first sample and figure that out quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 319
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Yes.  We never even learned much about Fiona's affair with Victor.  No one asked lol.  And how was Fiona supporting herself all these years?  Did she re-marry?  Does she work?  Has she previously had mental problems?  I don't need to know every minuet detail of her life, but we don't know much about her at all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It feels like this whole story could have been told by using Vivian.  I guess nobody would've believed her about the will.  And we don't know if there was more about Konstanin/Victor tale that got shelved due to Drake's illness.  But, this entire resolve is very Vivian-coded.

Unless RonC and Jamey only know one way to write older female villains (including Megan, they all seem to have gone to the Alexis Carrington School for Wayward Spinsters).

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Somebody call the ACLU! How long has Brady been cuffed to that chair in the interrogation room?  It's definitely been more than a day.

I had to laugh when Holly said she was getting a hotel room in Paris.  Firstly, who is renting a room to a 16-year-old in a foreign country?  And second, of course Nicole doesn't have room for guests, she's from Salem where everyone either lives in a studio apartment or a mansion.

Also, after seeing this mess of Fiona trying to push Sarah down the stairs, it is obvious that there were a million other options.  Fiona could've denied it and manipulated Xander to be on her side.  Fiona could've blackmailed EJ to get herself out of trouble.  Fiona could've implicated Maggie.  Like, those are just off the top of my head, and none of them include the ridiculous notion that Fiona could push a heavy wheelchair down the stairs.  And she could've had a dignified exit that would've allowed her to return in the future.

Also, did anyone else notice the flub that Xander referred to Maggie as 'Suzanne' during their scene in the square?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Holly mentioned in a previous episode Nicole asked her to stay at the apartment but she declined.  They agreed on a hotel nearby because Holly still was upset at Nicole.

Fiona could have gone down 100 different avenues to make this story work.  I think it comes down to SST's short term deal, which in itself sort of makes me wonder what's the point?  Find someone who will commit long term to tell the story correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I differ on the point of a short term arc.  I'm fine with a 2-3 month storyline.  However, the pacing is absurd. 

It took weeks for the accident to occur. We didn't need three fake outs of Sarah recalling the accident.  And the whole EJ business and the insta-healed paralysis were unnecessary.

Imagine, if Brady woke up the morning after the wedding, his car is missing, and he finds out Sarah has been in an accident.  Fiona is a hero for revealing the truth about the will and gets closer to Xander, while planting seeds of doubt about Sarah and all the lies she has told.  Any time Maggie is suspicious, Fiona writes it off as PTSD from Konstantin.  We never know that she's lying about sobriety.  In fact, it seems like maybe she's a little paranoid or has dementia. Until the scene with Sophia, and then the next day, she doesn't recall the conversation and calls her a liar.  Brady works on solving the mystery and falls in love with Ava in the meantime.  And the final reveal is that Kristen stole the car and Fiona was the driver.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I listened again, I didn't hear it. He did say this is... then start the sentence again quickly, so maybe that is what you heard?

I agree about Fiona. I am annoyed that Ron trashed yet another mother character (see Diana, Angelica) because of his own apparent issues. We never got any back story on her, why and how she slept with Victor, why Victor 'let' Titus die, the real truth about her abandoning of Xander. We got maybe two episodes of Xander 'dealing' with finding out he was Victor's son (and not a single scene of him talking to Sarah about it because we had to rush into him pursuing Theresa) before we rushed into the car crash story. We could have had a few weeks of him asking Fiona the whys of how the affair happened and her explaining her past to him and the audience, instead of Sarah fake remembering for a week and a half.

When Serena Scott Thomas joined the show she had an interview discussing an entire history of Fiona as a girl who grew up in a big house in Scotland with an alcoholic father and an enabling mother, who ran away at 18 to Europe where she was used and abused by older men.  Where was this information on screen? Did the actress create this herself to try to flesh out her character since Ron couldn't be bothered?

If this is how they end her character I will be very sad. I have waited for Xander to get a mother for 5 years, and I didn't expect her to be gone in 3 months. Since they introduced that she spent years in a mental institution, have her committed to Bayview for a bit and we can find out she had a psychotic break after the hit and run. Just don't have her room with Connie and Cardboard Li.

Edited by brisbydog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I 100% agree.  I don't mind short arcs.  They can serve their purpose.  Fiona was a character that needed a longer storyline to play out on screen.  There are so many things that could have been done with her.

Also, not going to lie, if SST just created that backstory for Fiona in her head I might love her.  And probably hire her on as a Days staff writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Except she never worked there at all and barely even knew where the Chancellor Industries plant was located  In 1980, Kay attempted to install Derek Thurston (her third husband) in a position at Chancellor Industries.  The show introduced a character named George Packard who'd supposedly been running Chancellor since Phillip's demise in 1975.  (George Packard's storyline in 1980 was attempting to keep Derek Thurston from bankrupting the company.)   We didn't hear much of anything about Chancellor Industries for the next twenty-five years.  Then, at that point, we met Eliot Hampton (?) who'd been running the company for decades and had been embezzling from it.  Jill took it upon her herself to oust Eliot Hampton (?) and take control of the company.  That's when Kay became actively involved in the management of the company.  From 1974 till 2004 Kay Chancellor was strictly a hands-off owner.  It was downright absurd that the last ten years of life, she was written as this formidable businesswoman who'd always been involved in Chancellor Industries.  
    • Well, it's going to be something when he finds out the truth.  Agreed.  On that note, I can't until it all comes out. I find Lulu to be ridiculous. 
    • I almost posted this because that was my initial reaction too:  this is weird/cringe, to sing around a piano after such a huge family shattering bomb was dropped.  But I got over that and just enjoyed her voice, the song and the montage we saw as everyone's emotions in the aftermath were pouring out.
    • The Equalizer original series was not a big hit yet it became a movie franchise and got a reboot series. The Equalizer reboot lasted 5 seasons, so one season longer than the original series.
    • Today is Sean Freeman's birthday 

      Please register in order to view this content

      His social media/IMDb doesn't have his age but from some posts he's made, I'm guessing 1989 is his birth year.
    • Here's the timeline, as I recall it being published. The WGA strike was 5/2–9/27/2023 Annalynne McCord was announced as being hired in December 2023, for a one-year contract https://deadline.com/2024/06/days-of-our-lives-when-to-expect-annalynne-mccord-peacock-1235975806/ RonC's first scripts back from the strike began airing May 31, 2024 (around Konstantine & Maggie's wedding) https://www.tvinsider.com/1137709/days-of-our-lives-writers-return-15000th-episode-storylines/ Her first air date was June 19th 2024. The actress has said she was not told who she would be playing until she started taping. RonC 's replacements were announced July 2024, with his scripts airing through April 2025 Side note: DAYS social media team seems to be playing fast and loose with BTS videos, in terms of how far in advance they film content (e.g. their April Fools' Joke videos were clearly not filmed on 4/1/25), so we shouldn't assume anyone's current status, versus those who were there nine months ago.
    • April and her husband (Draper) are the "young leads" who tie all the storyline threads together.  They're normally in the center of the action.  In this particular storyline, Draper is the attorney who represents Paige Madison.  (The district attorney, Logan Swift, has given Paige Madison "temporary immunity from prosecution" if she will lead the police to the members of the Tobias Gang who stole the firearms.  But Paige mainly just ducks bullets from various gang members who pop-up to assassinate her.)    
    • It's one thing to post about a soap's rumors or gossip, which in point of fact we've all done. It's another to present yourself as the inside source who knows something to be fact that's about to break wide, then backtrack and call it just Twitter speculation. Between those two extreme poles you have to commit to one or the other. If I got something wrong, I'd say it. (Nor would I keep playing insider after what I pulled with Drake Hogestyn, which should've gotten someone permanently banned.) And regardless, you don't open with this 'news' you don't actually want to stand by yet by mocking DRW's extremely valid concerns re: how the Trina character and Tabyana Ali has been marginalized and put out to virtual pasture ever since the day NAC left. Her playing out her current contract in a C-storyline with Kai does not change that.
    • Yeah, I thought it would be more explosive or heated and it was kind of standard.  Both can do more with the material.  I just don't think the writing was there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy