Jump to content

Young & Restless - May 2024 Episode Rankings


Recommended Posts

  • Members

May 2024 Episode Rankings
A total of 23 Episodes aired this Month
Thanks as always @jcar03!

1.) Peter Bergman (Jack Abbott) : 14
*.) Eric Braeden (Victor Newman) : 14
3.) Hayley Erin (Claire Grace) : 13
4.) Trevor St.John (Tucker McCall) : 11
5.) Allison Lanier (Summer Newman) : 10
*.) Michael Mealor (Kyle Abbott) : 10
*.) Christopher Cousins (Alan Laurent/Martin Laurent) : 10 (As Alan : 9, As Martin: 1) 
*.) Eileen Davidson (Ashley Abbott) : 10
*.) J. Eddie Peck (Cole Howard) : 10

*.) Colleen Zenk (Jordan) : 10
11.) Amelia Heinle (Victoria Newman) : 9
*.) Courtney Hope (Sally Spectra) : 9 
*.) Zuleyka Silver (Audra Charles) : 9
*.) Susan Walters (Diane Jenkins) : 9 
15.) Sean Dominic (Nate Hastings) : 8
*.) Bryton James (Devon Hamilton) : 8
*.) Redding Munsell (Harrison Abbott) : 8
18.) Christel Khalil (Lily Winters) : 7
*.) Joshua Morrow (Nick Newman) : 7
*.) Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki Newman) : 7
*.) Michelle Stafford (Phyllis Summers) : 7
22.) Melissa Claire Egan (Chelsea Lawson) : 6
*.) Mark Grossman (Adam Newman) : 6
24.) Beth Maitland (Traci Abbott) : 5
25.) Christian LeBlanc (Michael Baldwin) : 4
*.) Melissa Ordway (Abby Newman) : 4
*.) Jason Thompson (Billy Abbott) : 4
28.) Kate Linder (Esther Valentine) : 3
*.) Jess Walton (Jill Abbott) : 3
30.) Sharon Case (Sharon Rosales) : 2
*.) Michael Graziadei (Daniel Romalotti) : 2
*.) Elizabeth Hendrickson (Chloe Fisher) : 2
*.) Lisa Williams (Ashley Double #1) : 2
34.) Conner Floyd (Phillip "Chance" Chancellor IV) : 1
*.) Lauralee Bell (Christine Williams) : 1
*.) Michael Damian (Danny Romalotti) : 1

*.) Cait Fairbanks (Tessa Porter) : 1
*.) Judah Mackey (Connor Newman) : 1

*.) Veronica Redd (Mamie Johnson) : 1
*.) Wendy Wilkins (Ashley Double #2) : 1


Contract Star(s) Not Appearing this Month
1.) Camryn Grimes (Mariah Copeland) 
2.) Brytni Sarpy (Elena Dawson) 


 

Edited by YRfan23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I don't know why they ended Daniel and Lily. Those two had chemistry! Now what is Lily going to do? To put conflict into their relationship, one of Lily's disapproving twins should have come back to town. Maybe Mattie, and she could have ended up in Kyle's orbit.

Wow! Elena's storyline is ON FIRE!  I can't wait to see what she does(Not) do next!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As you correctly showed, he appeared once on contract during May.

May 1st was Conner Floyd's final contract appearance.
He was last listed in the contract credits as of April 29 US (April 26 CDN),
so that would be for week of April 29 - May 3 US.

The next time the  closing credits listed actors was on  May 8 US (May 7 CDN),
and he was removed entirely then.

The next time he aired was in June and he was credited as recurring, per closing credits of June 7 US (June 6 CDN).

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Has anyone else noticed, Y&R does not have a long-term consistent trouble-maker (bad-girl/bad-boy) in the cast (aside from Phyllis who is a grandmother)?  And hasn't for years.  Y&R is missing many important components of a soap opera, but one of the biggest omissions is THERE IS NO CONFLICT...   How can a soap opera survive without conflict?  Everyone just walks around Genoa City talking about who is running which company, and who has been demoted or promoted at which company.  And of course, we get the occasional evil short-term villain (Ashland Locke, Jeremy Stark, Aunt Jordan, Martin, etc.) who pops up for a few weeks or months and terrorizes a character or two.  The show needs a couple of bad characters (antagonists) who stay on the canvas for years, and cause trouble over and over again.  A good soap opera needs some level of interpersonal conflict in every episode.    

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Chance seems like an important "legacy character" who'd be especially easy to write storylines for, plus (in my opinion) they currently have a fairly charismatic actor in the role.  It's difficult to understand why he and Noah Newman aren't the young leads right now.   

I agree that there's no significant antagonist on the canvas who weaves in & out of various stories.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy