Jump to content

Inequities in the Healthcare System


Sundance

Recommended Posts

  • Members

someone who makes $60,000-$125,000 a year is going to bitch about someone only making $16,000 a year paying $1 a month for health coverage? I'd rather make $60,000 and pay the freakin' $482.

And I'm not going to pretend like I know everything about how hospitals and insurance work, but going to the ER uninsured does not equal free hospital visits, illegal immigrant or not.

I agree. People I know who have welfare/ food stamps/ disability have it because they need it. They don't drive fancy cars or sit on their asses and smoke crack. Many people get these "handouts" in addition to having a job, or trying to find a job. It's not easy for those born without privilege to succeed despite what many think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Totally true. There are abuses here and there, but there is with any system... you don't throw something away because it's not perfect. that attitude reminds me of people who will throw away an apple because there is a tiny blemish on it, instead of cutting out the offending part and eating the rest. You will find by and large, the people bitching about this are all making plenty of money to make ends meet, they just want to live some kind of luxurious lifestyle while someone else dies in the gutter. Just yesterday, there was a guy calling Dave Ramsey's show, and he was having trouble making his budget and meeting his expenses... when Dave asked him how much he made, the response was "220,000$ a year". PLEASE. His "vacation house" had become a financial burden, and he acting like this was such a problem for him. POOR THING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is a certain amount that can be cut from local post offices, but it needs to be based on mileage, not population. Like for instance, I would close any small rural post office if there is another one in a town close by that is less than 10 miles away. But you still would have your home delivery, etc... The postal servie has worked just fine for well over 100 years, so it's a good system, but needs help and adjustment due to the age of the internet and reduced volume of mail. It has been determined that 63 cents is what is needed to bring them back into the black. They just need to do it! And 25 miles is a BIG hardship, especially with gasoline at over 3$ a gallon, in rural areas, you do NOT have to drive 25 miles to get to a grocery store or gas station, but you DO to get to a facility that ships FEDEX or UPS. And when it comes to a basic first class letter, FEDEX won't do something like that for less than 2$, i can guarantee you. This article lines it out pretty well:

http://www.cfra.org/ruralmonitor/2012/11/29/rural-post-offices-prepare-reduction-hours

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Max, I was just throwing the 25 mile figure out there because I assumed that you would find a fedex location in every county, shich in Missouri, the centers of the counties are more of less 25 miles apart. I was VERY wrong. While there are fedex drop boxes for envelopes in more places, FEDEX locations where you can acutally ship a package are FAR less frequent. Out of Missouri's 114 counties, only TWLEVE counties contain a FEDEX shipping store. If you want to send a package via FEDEX and live in the middle of the Ozarks, you would have to drive 140 miles to do so. So you can see why the Postal service is vital to rural america.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy