Jump to content

GH: so addicted


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Hello I juust joined and despite some of the storylines on GH I still love it! it's my get away. my wish is for Genie Francis to come back, there is still hope yet after reading the latest issue of SOD.

I'm having trouble getting used to JJ as Lucky. once again the writers are rewriting history, JJ doesn't fit in as a cop, I liked it when LUcky and Liz first met.

Love Jason and sam and Jax and Carly and spinelli and Maxie, but seems like spin and max and Carly and Jax are heading in the wrong directio again, but Guza can't keep goood couples together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

WELCOME :wub: !!!!!!!!

Lucky history was already hacked...

they rewrote Lucky's history by the way of two renditions

if Lucky would have stayed true to form he probably wouldn't have been a cop

Lucky was a street smart intellectual who tutored Emily in Physics / and / or math

he was no doofus.....Jacob/Greg's versions was not Lucky Spencer for me.

He and Jason were friends not adversaries

He was a computer whizkid and was the Spinelli of his day therefore

he would not have been all thumbs re: his taxes and wouldn't have needed Elizabeth's help

I have no trouble seeing him as a cop what I have trouble with is how they wrote Lucky

after JJ's departure...they hacked him big time to make him inept and this is a kid who

was on the run with Laura and Luke a wise old soul that was mature far beyond his years.

Its not Lucky Greg or Jonathan that is the problem for many Lucky/Jonathan/Greg fans

its "how Lucky was dummyed down and whittled down to a former shell of himself...

Lucky was not a dudley do-right as was portrayed by Greg nor the abusive controlling Lucky

portrayed by Jacob Young's version.

This is just butchery of the iconic 4 muskateers friendship IMO more dismantling GH

history to replace it with what? Sorry I liked Greg and think he was gorgeous but

his Lucky was "not" Lucky Spencer for many fans who was there when Lucky appeared at

eleven years old. What Jonathan does is make this ELizabeth/Nikolas crap even less believable and

is the face of when GH was awesome not the mob-centric muddled mess of crap its become.

Greg was the handsomest man on GH "barr none" he wasn't a Georgio Armani model for nothing :lol:

What I am seeing is Lucky Spencer an iconic character in his own right but the son of the

iconic supercouple of all time. He didn't win three Emmys for nothing there was a reason for

that...I believe that they were getting rid of Greg and if this is true I'd rather have Jonathan back

then suffer through a Lucky x 4 :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy