Jump to content

2008: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I don't want to get in between the argument between Toups and Sylph but I have one question...

Sylph, why does it seem like you want Y&R to be led by all newbies rather than people who worked on the show for a longer time under Will J. Bell? And I don't mean only head-writing, but breakdowns/scripts too.

It seems to me that old Y&R writers at least have some advantage (and knowledge) as opposed to total strangers...

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Toups and I argue all the time! Nothing new! :lol: We disagree constantly (except on Heroes and Coupling). :P

I'm quite puzzled by your impression. Have I not listed Frederick Johnson, Best and Minnis as subwriters in my dream team? Birn also. The only thing I don't want for Y&R is bad old writers to come back. I'd, for example, love it if Sara Bibel could return.

  • Members
Posted

Yeah, I've noticed it... it's quite funny and enjoyable to follow your 'disagreements'.

What about SSM or Jim Houghton? And why is it you don't like Natalie M. Slater?

  • Members
Posted

Well, I'm glad to hear this. I think that our arguments are civilised, we don't offend each other sneakily. At least, I think so.

I'll have to think about SSM and JH. And my "dislike" of NMS is different from dislike of JFE. It's just that I would never put NMS to be Y&R's next HW. And she's not a stellar scriptwriter and given that I would like the best of the best for Y&R, she is not on my list.

  • Members
Posted

One more question---is your Janice & Trent dislike based on their skills as writers in any position or only HW position?

  • Members
Posted

I for one don't like Sally Sussman Morina. During her last Y&R stint she really mingled some crazy stuff - don't know whether the poisoned necklace was hers (although I *think* it was her idea) - qualifying her right back for DAYS.

I always wondered how closely she was trained under Bill Bell though. In the 80s she served double duties, being on the show's writing team and also being it's first ever story consultant... Seems Bill Bell thought highly of her but for some reason never asked her back later after she quit for Generations/DAYS et al.

  • Members
Posted

I would like an answer to this question: why do all these soap operas have that awwwful script format - the double spacing, stage directions all in capitals, lots of underlining etc.? Can't they just make it like the primetime episodic TV? Possibly, the Aaron Sorkin version. :D

  • Members
Posted

From what I've observed form Claire at RH and GH, she has an OUTSTANDING reputation for hiring stellar script writers. All one has to observe GH's dialogue before Labine and during her stint to see the upward improvement in the diologue department she brought to that show. Val Jean, Harris, and Korte all trained under Labine first at GH before they became Guza's friends.

However, Claire at OLTL and GL was a disaster. Yes, the dilogue did improve at both shows during her brief stints there, but the overall storytelling was either ridiculously dull or bad. I also place a lot of blame towards the EP's of both shows though. I think Claire probably works best with a strong EP, hence why wrote brilliantly at GH during Wendy Riche's reighn as EP there.

I believe Claire said at that daytime writing event last year, that Sylph posted about, she'd love to return to soap writing, but she hasn't been approached by any show.

  • Members
Posted

She is supposedly also writing something with Paul Avila Meyer. There was a weird topic about this on SoapNet's forum some time ago... About one member calling her at home, or something like that, and how they talked about a lot of things...

  • Members
Posted

I know Claire said she was working on a play, and I know Paul is also a playwright. I doubt it's anything daytime-related, sadly.

I'd love it if Claire and Paul re-teamed to write a soap though. Maybe they could write it for a year or two and Claire's two children, Matt and Eleanor, could take over afterwards. Yeah, just a wish...

Matt and Eleanor should be writing for soaps, they did train with their mother and they're younger as well...

  • Members
Posted

I don't see how Claire would thrive on Y&R? She doesn't write in the tradition of Bill Bell. Her writing is much more folksy and down to earth. Classic Y&R in its heyday was pure camp and lush, sweeping romantic melodrama. Those really aren't her fortes. Plus, she'd probably get plenty of pressure from CBS and Sony, just like she got from P&G and Rauch over at GL. On paper, she should've been a perfect fit for GL, which at its heart was a multigenerational and family-centered show, Claire's trademark. But she failed miserably there.

  • Members
Posted

I agree there, but maybe SOAPSFOREVER thought she could adapt her style? Like GH what is was before Claire got there. GH was extra campy with those supercouples and action/adventure stories. However, Claire managed to keep some of those qualities, but focused more on romances and multi-generational drama.

I don't know what was behind her failure at OLTL though...

  • Members
Posted

Which of your fav soap writers/producers are Democrats? Who's contributing to Obama?

http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/

check out that website. My idol, Nancy Demorest (nee Curlee) donated to Obama, she lists her profession as self-employed writer...come back Nancy. Gary Tomlin for Obama; Kreizman for Obama; Brad Bell donated the max to Obama! Even though the Bells are very Republican. See William Bell's entries from 2004, donating to the RNC and George Bush..ick.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
    • It’s also strange that it was Monica! I just don’t think of her as the staring off into space type of woman! I watched a bunch of other clips and stuff from random 1978 and 1979 episodes. I’m so used to seeing movement from Monty’s era, especially the early part, that this really is a cool relic. Pretty soon you have scenes start at the new nurses station, the elevators opening and doctors walking to the desk to get their messages from Jessie or Bobbie. People often walk towards doors while taking coats on or off, many Webber house scenes start or end with someone walking up the stairs. This episode is even more static than some of the way earlier ones I have seen, where you would have Steve or Jessie at least going from the old school nurses desk to the medicine room, Steve’s office, etc. That bland dialogue is very much like what they have now. The show picks up a lot of personality. Knowing what we know about David Hamilton and how that really started to get the ball rolling as far as viewers you really see just how vital Lesley and especially Laura were to get things moving for them. They focused on the right characters to get fast results. The show now could learn a thing or two from this.
    • It won't allow me to watch it via the link; I am only able to watch it with the app.
    • Just finished the Goldfinch. Read it in 4-5 days... and it's a huuuuge book. Well... I would rate the first 500 pages a solid 10 out of 10... but then the next 300 were kind of a letdown... so the overall impression is something like - 7/10. It's just very hard to give something a full 10 after reading A little life.  Still... loved it immensely and would probably re-read it in the future. There is a movie adaptation... starring Nicole Kidman... that I haven't seen. 
    • I realize I harp on this, but I think he spending is relevant.  She's not just buying new wigs. She's building a mansion, she's funding a sports complex, she's paying for operations for people she doesn't know, she's caring for Peaches, she's buying apartments. We saw ?her get ONE check for ONE million dollars. That's it. I may be wrong, but I thought they said she'd get a payment every 6 months. Regardless, she could not rule the roost on $1M, and the show is not doing a good job there. Pretending that doesn't matter? I can't do that.  All they had to do was add a couple lines about payouts and payments.  In other news, I would love to know just how much Anita was putting into that trust as well as what investment got her what has to be an incredible return.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy