Jump to content

The state of GL by Patrick Erwin


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Every time I watch GL, I am of two minds.

On one hand, I am struck by the absolutely miniscule budget, stripped to the bone cast, and host of irrelevant, ill-conceived storylines. Rafe and Natalia? Beth's latest baby? Jeffrey? Father Josh? Wild, desperate improvisation with Harley, Marina, Cyrus, Mallet, and others?

OTOH, I am also always struck by what I think are often extremely talented, naturalistic dialogue writers, to the point where I begin to wonder if the actors are rewriting themselves. Many of the actors, like Bob Bogue, Beth Ehlers, Robert Newman, even Zimmer, are also great. But they're all stuck in bad, bad stories, or stuck writing bad or pointless stories. If you can divorce yourself from the contexts of the scenes, bits like Mallet and Marina being tempted by their long-standing affection for each other on the job is almost compelling if you forget about Dinah or the fact that Mallet was once her uncle! I thought the beginning of the Dinah brain damage story was great, and that her and Matt turning to each other as Matt's midlife crisis made some sense. Even the Reva/Jeffrey or Josh and family scenes are sometimes very real, if you forget that Jeffrey is totally pointless and Fr. Josh is a horrible idea.

They seem to me to have a lot of the right tools available to them. The nonsense with Will and Edmund is endlessly entertaining, and I don't understand why they haven't properly explored the post-Tammy Cassie, who seemed for a long time to be damaged, on the edge, and capable of almost anything - like cheating on Josh and succumbing to her inner 'whatever' by f_____g Edmund. Nicole Forester may not be right as Cassie but she is infinitely more interesting when she is playing 'dark' Cassie or in scenes with DAM.

GL just needs to beef up their wrecked families, get new storylines and concepts, and for God's sake, get some more [!@#$%^&*] money.

Incidentally, the first things I'd do would be dump some of the no-hopers, like Rafe and Natalia, figure out a way to restore the Bauers, and then find any way possible to bring back the elderly and unwilling Beverlee McKinsey back as Alex on any basis, along with Catherine Hickland in the role of Hope Bauer to throw Alan for a loop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great article. And Vee, very good post. I agree with a lot of the things you have said.

The thing that aggravates me the most about my beloved GL is the way the stories are told. You're right Vee, the dialogue (for the most part) comes across to me as very genuine. It seems to me, as you have said, effortless. That's really the highlight of the story. At times, the writers seem to have some very good ideas for stories that fall completely flat on-screen. For example:

- Josh going to prison to "save" Cassie. How ironic would it have been that while he was in prison, Josh was the victim of prison rape? The savior would then need saving. That would have been compelling drama for not only Josh, but Reva and Cassie as well. KZ would have knocked that out of the park. And it would have given NF/Cassie ever more reasons to slip from reality. NF/Cassie was VERY watchable and interesting to me as "Crazy Cassie".

- Edmund's return to Springfield should have been played out with his ultimate coupling with Alex. DAM and Marj Dusay would be spectacular as the "King and Queen" of Springfield. In my opinion, their scenes together oozed chemistry.

EW/DK have annointed the Coopers the Kennedys of Springfield, ignoring other families that are severly disjointed. Shayne and Marah should return to town ASAP. The Bauers could be easily re-constituted by bringing an aged Rita back to town with her grown TWIN children (guy/girl) that she was pregnant with when she left town. Ed's children. Meta's side of the family could be explored a little further with news of her death (I don't remember them killing her character off on-screen), they return to town. It wouldn't be that difficult with a little imagination. I love the idea of Hope Bauer being re-introduced with either Catherine Hickland or Robin Mattson.

Of course, the "Inside the Light" episodes have to go. Like NOW. They disrupt the continuity of the story and much too much happens in that hour time frame.

Lastly, EW/DK's proclivity for letting major events happen off-screen (Beth/Rick's affair, Vanessa/Matt's reconciliation, Beth's "present" from Philip) have to stop NOW. In order for viewers to actually CARE about the story being told, we have to SEE IT! Not hear about it weeks or days after it's happened. While I like the character of Rafe and his portrayer (yum), IA that him and his mother's presence in Springfield is not necessary. Get rid of them, AVA, Remy, nuDylan and Daisy. They are all dead wood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jodie stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
    • LOL!! That's funny.  I actually thought he got a little better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh God, she's back? I thought those first scenes were well-intentioned but hysterical.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy