Jump to content

Nielsen launches fans forum


Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://www.variety.com/index.asp?layout=pr...categoryid=1237

Nielsen launches fans forum

Online social network geared to TV, film fans

By MICHAEL LEARMONTH

The Nielsen Co. wants to know what you think.

The ratings giant has begun beta testing an online social network to give passionate TV or film fans a forum to express their views -- with the studios and networks listening in.

The service, dubbed Hey! Nielsen, will allow visitors to sound off on music and film in addition to TV. It will tabulate a popular vote of enthusiasts from which it will derive a "Hey! Nielsen Score," designed to be a measure of buzz and audience engagement.

"It's an outlet for people who want to express their views on television, and want to come to Nielsen to have some influence," said Karen Watson, senior VP of communications and exec in charge of the service. "Joining the network will be a way to let the entertainment industry know what you think."

Nielsen ratings are the currency on which the business of television is based -- and they determine on an almost singular basis which shows live or die.

Because Nielsen families are chosen at random in an effort to craft a sample that reflects the nation's demographics, ratings are notoriously impervious to the enthusiast factor. The Internet, on the other hand, is fertile ground for enthusiast-driven campaigns to save low-rated shows from "Arrested Development" to "Jericho."

Yet enthusiasts are by definition not representative of the American population, and some see the danger that a consumer service called Hey! Nielsen would disproportionately attract members of Nielsen families, and thus taint the national sample.

"Are Nielsen households going to avail themselves of this website more than the general population? If so, we have a system that may undermine or create problems with the national sample," said Jack Wakshlag, chief research officer of Turner Networks.

Film and TV fan sites have become part of the media's marketing plans. Bloggers are courted and even paid. And network and studio marketers do everything they can to boost buzz through Internet advertising, paid search and anonymous posts to blogs and fan sites.

As the networks work overtime to cultivate denizens of sites like Television Without Pity and MySpace, execs acknowledge it is sometimes difficult to tell the difference between genuine online buzz and buzz created by the marketing department.

Wakshlag said the connection between buzz and ratings isn't well understood, but one thing is clear. "Shows that seem to have buzz online don't end up being the shows that become hits," he said.

Perhaps not surprisingly, "Jericho," canceled by CBS last spring, is the No. 1 rated show and had double the Hey! Nielsen rating of second-place "Heroes."

Nielsen said it will police Hey! Nielsen for any sign of corporate interest, or for the rabid fans who may want to make their vote count more than once.

"We will monitor the site closely to make sure there aren't any unusual activities or abuses and we encourage members to report anything they think is unusual or abusive," spokesman Gary Holmes said. He said monitoring will included any potential impact on Nielsen panelists.

In addition to the data, Nielsen hopes the site will help build brand awareness among young people that it needs to recruit for its national and local ratings surveys.

"We have to make sure the younger demo has brand awareness of the Nielsen Co. so when we come knocking on doors they know who we are," Watson said.

The site is in consumer beta mode and Watson admitted it's still unclear if they can get fans to adopt it or if Nielsen's clients among the studios, networks and ad agencies will pay for the data.

Nielsen plans to launch the Spanish-language version, "Oye! Nielsen" in January.

Read the full article at:

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117972657.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I can definitely see that airing the same week as The Love Boat colliding with an iceberg and sinking while crossing the North Atlantic on the Titanic anniversary with a “Who lives and dies?!” Promo next to Mr Belvedere being blackmailed over his wanted fugitive status back in the UK

      Please register in order to view this content

        Agree with you both. I am also going assume that while Hotel may had some big numbers the first 2 seasons the demographics weren’t great. Reason I say this is I distinctly remember my parents watching St Elsewhere and/or The Equalizer after Dynasty.    I still don’t get Hotel’s designation as a primetime soap opera either lol. ABC should have aired Paper Dolls in the 10/9 slot on Wednesdays in the fall of 1984 to give that show some more legs.    Obviously ABC was eyeing a double bill night in the same vein as Dallas & Falcon Crest and that might have worked better than leaving Paper Dolls to the wolves in an untested timeslot.
    • I tend to stay out of EP discussions, simply because I rarely know who EPs when. And they all have their good and bad sides. But how are we supposed to judge JFP on anything other than what we see? I didn't know she was a director or a music director. (and unlike say, Chris Goutman, I never saw her credited as anything other than an EP) Specifically in the matter of casting Crampton, she took credit for it (or at Crampton gave her credit for it, whatever) and it was arguably, one of the worst recasts of the '90's (and either as bad or worse than the actress she fired).  She lost two important actresses in '92 and still decided to kill Maureen.  She had a wildly uneven tenure at GL. It's no wonder she's polarizing. But it kind of proves a point--great soap is always a that rare combination of everything clicking at the same time.  And believe me, if I could bring myself to watch her male successors who were responsible for bringing back Reva and allowing her to eat the show again, or hiring Hunt Block, or being too chicken to stand up to stans who and hamstrung the show with boring couples stuck in the same repetitive stories (Vanessa/Matt, Chelle/Danny or Richard/Cassie, take your pick) not to mention San CristoHELL....I'd be more than happy to roast them on open spits. I guess we end up talking about JFP because she's in a period we can nominally agree was one of the last "best" periods of the show.
    • A degree does not make one an expert at their job, it just shows that you can follow directions from a technical standpoint.  It doesn't mean that they're creative. JFP was all about the look of a show without considering that technical beauty can only carry a show so far if there is nothing interesting to go along with it.  Equality means calling out flaws equally in both genders. 
    • NBC or P&G was even fool enough to take a full page ad for two consecutive weeks in TV Guide promoting this horrible storyline.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • JFP has had more defense for her decades of terrible producing than many male producers ever had.
    • It makes sense that she got a degree in directing. I've always said she should have been a director. I think she works better at the technical aspects of the show. I think her problem is the emotion/heart of a show.  She always guts the heart of the show she's on and she makes decisions that stop longtime viewers from watching a show. I don't think it's sexism to call that out especially as I've said similar things about Conboy. I've called out Rauch for much worse. 
    • "Aunt Blanche" first appears toward the end of this episode, about 57 minutes in.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • You're probably right. They may have just wanted edits of certain characters. Hopefully the rest is around.
    • Of course!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm wondering if there were bits cut from this footage, because to me it seems that may be the case. At 11:23, Laurie tells her psychiatrist that the bar phoned and told her Mark got into a fight and needs to be picked up. It starts to fade to the next scene, you hear some different music begin and get cut off between the static, and where you'd expect to see the aftermath of the fight, we cut back to a later scene of Laurie in bed worrying about what's happening. The credits at the end also show that more than Mark, Laurie and Dr. Northcote should have been in this episode. Another character, Brody, played by Ed Setrakian, is mentioned but not shown. If this is the case, perhaps the original fan who saved this episode has the additional scenes.
    • Anyway… It’s a shame that the video that depicted Leticia’s death was removed from YT.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy