Jump to content

OLTL: The OPP Story - My Idea


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know we're all happy to see the OPP over and done with, and I know everyone is just glad that another Higley story is now safely secured in the "never talk about again" file in the OLTL history offices, but can we just take a minute to think about how the story COULD have gone? Here's my take for what could have turned this clunker into a much better story for the show:

The story would start out exactly the same - Tate Harmon comes to Llanview, romances Adriana, ticks off Rex, acts suspicious. Layla thinks he's a great guy, too - Vincent's a little suspicious. After Nora's house is burnt down, though, a familiar face returns to Llanview: the biracial, Jewish Rachel Gannon. Now a hotshot defense attorney, Rachel mingles with the fair town of Llanview, getting to know everybody including striking up a friendship with Tate. Meanwhile, the arsonist continues to haunt Llanview and does everything that was in the original story, right down to the near-murder of Evangeline Williamson. However, Evangeline doesn't initially go into the coma - she's alive but weak. She also happened to see the arsonist - Tate. She whispers Tate's name to Layla just as she codes and goes into a coma. Layla, shocked but suspicious, goes to Tate. When she tells him that she knows the truth, he knocks her out, makes it look like she took some drugs and sets fire to her apartment. He runs, but messily leaves some DNA evidence for the police to find.

From here, things change ridiculously from the original story and snowball into an umbrella story involving much of Llanview. Layla is saved, and remembers everything. Tate is arrested; Kirk Harmon comes to town. Llanview becomes split on the situation: would the famous Tate Harmon, a wonderful role model sports star do these HORRIBLE things? Nora isn't sure, but she doesn't want her kids anywhere near the situation. Tate professes his innocence: "I don't hate anyone!" Rex, Layla, Vincent, Talia, Bo, Christian and John all believe he's guilty. Adriana, Kirk, and the sympathetic Llanview crowd believes he's innocent. After all, Layla was on drugs that night (courtesy of Tate) and mourning her sister's coma. Who better to accuse than someone like Tate, who would attract attention to the arson case? However, there IS DNA evidence around the crime scene. Tate does need a lawyer.

Enter Rachel Gannon.

Much to her mother's chagrin, Rachel decides to defend Tate. After buying his convincing story of innocence, she takes on his case and makes it quite compelling. The story begins to unfold eerily like the gang rape story involving Marty during the 1990s. Marty and Nora have a heart-to-heart; Starr and Todd have a discussion on morality; Matthew is torn between siding with his mother and his big sister; Rachel begins to see the tears in Tate's story. Finally, right before she is about to give her closing statement, she overhears a conversation between Tate and Kirk that incriminates Tate, proving that he was indeed the arsonist. Rachel ends up delivering a vicious, emotionally charged speech to the jury that destroys Tate and her career, much like Nora's in the 90s. Sadly, a mistrial is declared. Tate is free to walk the streets and smirks at all those who knew the truth. Suddenly, a shot is fired; Tate falls to the ground dead, shot at the hands of his ashamed and horrified father, Kirk. Kirk is arrested, albeit gently by the police, and Llanview is free to heal. Rachel Gannon is now a major character on the show, and positioned to be a fixture in Llanview for some time to come.

It's not perfect, but after today's eye-roller of a trial I just thought of all the melodramatic trials of OLTL past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I love it actually!

Yah what a waste of good actors and some good ideas (I'll admit it) in the way it played on tv. Hideous--especially when we got characters just making NO sense (ie Tate persues Adriana for MONTHS and we see not one inch of him not being all over her and suddenly we see him flinchign adn grimacing everythign he "has" to kiss her)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
    • We can only guestimate based on other characters. Chelsea was said to be 23 in the first episodee and based on Marttin wanting to run for President in the next election, he's about 30/31. Eva and and Kat are somewhere between that  so Id say closer to 25 or 26
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy