Jump to content

Which Country Shows The Greatest Soap Operas


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm from the US, but I would pick

UK soaps no contest!!

So All my Shadows, I'm afraid you are mistaken, people are not always going to pick the country they're from.

The longest soap I have watched continuously, from any country, is EastEnders, since Eddie Royle's death in 1991 or 1992. The relatability of the characters and their yearning, the humorous moments and characters and the sad ones, the family connections, are gripping. Never have I seriously considered quitting. We are only up to 2002 episodes on my local PBS station right now though. When we got it, I also enjoyed watching Emmerdale (then Emmerdale Farm).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As far as the original question of this thread goes, which is very valid as we do have international visitors and local viewers who watch international soaps (as evident by our Foreign Soaps thread) and a topic we havent discussed for a while, it's difficult to pick.

The UK soaps are amazing for their production values, casting, and intelligent writing. The Australian soaps are great for their outdoor locations - especially Home and Away's beach, casting, production, and they tend to tell more escapist stories that are still grounded in reality. The US soaps ..... um, cheap production, six pack casting, and plot driven writing that hasn't been done right for atleast a decade.

The UK soaps are a little too grounded in reality for my taste. I like some escapism and excitment in my soaps.

The US soaps are currently a laughing stock in comparison. Too much meddling by people who don't understand and don't care about the genre, only what cross promotional possibilities there are. They've lost the social relevance that made them once so great. And the outlandish stories they've been doing for the last 20 years is feeling repetitive.

The Australian soaps are more the right mix of UK and US soap. They have the character based drama, with the excellent production values and casting, while at the same time telling stories that aren't grounded in grim reality and that would probably never happen to anyone in real life. Only downside to theirs is their timeslot means they can only have a certain # of PG rated episodes per year. But even when they are on a G rated day, the only thing really effected is some of the dialogue become a bit simple.

I definitely like the Australian ones best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There would be no British soaps if a little woman named Irna Phillips wouldn't have started the genre. Soaps are a uniquely American artform and I don't think British soaps have ever really done anything to improve upon them. Sorr, it's all about American soaps where we like our women big-haired and bitchy, our heroines crying and our couples smoking hot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm pretty sure what you just described is nothing like what Irna Phillips created. The soaps the US currently has owe more to Larry Jacobs and Aaron Spelling and the glamourious camp they created in primetime that daytime stole, morethan they do to Irna Phillips - sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course, the latter part was in jest. I know what Irna phillips created and that forumla will always be best in my book but there is no denying that part of the appleal, legacy and magic of the genre is th glamour (think Santa Barbara, Conboy's Y&R, Monty's GH, B&B). The difference now is that soaps don't have the budget and they certainly don't have the compelling stories of yesteryear. But even today, they can sometimes surprise. Point is: Great writing is great, I wish Agnes Nixon was writing AMC now, but theres a some magic in the glamor of the American soaps that simply isn't present in the soap operas of other countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please. I was not trying to tell him what he can and can't talk about. I'm not so stupid that I think I have control over what someone says. I was being completely rhetorical with my first sentence because I knew where the thread would end up. Someone would imply that all US soaps are filled to the brim with models who don't have any acting skills. Yes, it's true to an extent, but it's a little hyperbolic to act as if there's no legitimate talent in daytime.

Personally speaking, there are a lotta things in the UK soaps that I would love for our soaps to have. No SORASing would be great, but it's much too late to make a no-SORAS policy. It's been going on since 1940s, so making people their right ages now would throw things even more out of whack than they already are. Of course I'd love more balance and for the older cast members to get stories that are truly their own. I'd love it if each soap had their own outdoor set, but I think it'd be harder to do that here than it is in the UK. With the UK soaps, most of them are set around a relatively close area, so it's not hard to know what to build a set for. You figure..."Coronation Street," the outdoor set would be...Coronation Street. And for "EastEnders," they would use a set of Albert Square. But for AMC, what would be the logical choice? An exterior of the Valley Inn? Or the park? Or the boathouse?

But there are some things I just wouldn't want to see in the US soaps. Like, for instance, in December, Wendy Richard, an original cast member of EE, left the show. So they killed her character, Pauline Fowler, off on Christmas Day. And I think about that...and it'd be like killing Stephanie Forrester off on Christmas or killing Dorian Lord off on Christmas. It just seems like such a mood-killer. And then there's the fact that both UK and Aussie soaps seem to have a constantly revolving door of characters and cast members. You can check out the "Neighbours" cast list right now and there are only 7 people who were on the show pre-2000. I've been researching "Home and Away" a lot lately and I still can't get over the fact that out of 18 cast members, half of them joined the show in either 2005 or 2006. I know that those soaps are targeted more to a younger audience and that the UK soaps have a lot more veterans, but I still can't get over it. I really liked the "Neighbours" episodes I saw on Oxygen from 1999, but most of the people who were on the show then are gone now, so if I were to watch a 2007 episode, I'd recognize no one.

Eh, I could go for either one of those three countries' soaps. They're the only three countries of soaps that I really know anything about at all, so I can't put any others into the mix. I'd love it if there was a cable channel here in the US that aired the UK and Aussie soaps regularly, current and classic episodes. I'd love to see the campy goodness that was "Crossroads."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know a single person in America that has access to watching soaps from other country's. So most of us can't make a fair assestment.

Am I the only one getting sick of all these "Whose the best...." Vote for this and that stuff that is littering the board. Honestly, people jumped all over another poster for these exact same constant posts but no one seems to care here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well...to be completely honest, some people are able to catch some of the UK soaps on their PBS stations, and Canada, I think, gets all of the UK soaps. And you can easily just download episodes from the Internet or whatever. But I mean...when you think about it, how can there really be a truly fair comparison. My thoughts come strictly from what I've read and the few clips I've seen online.

The funny thing is, I remember when GH was airing on ABC's station in the UK and I went to a UK soap board and they all just *loved* it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There would be no country called the United States of America if some British people hadn't created a colony here. The United States is a uniquely British creation, and I don't think the US has ever really done anything to improve upon its British roots.

(Do I really mean this? No. But to say that origins mean no comparisons can be made today is really pushing it!!)

Anyway, I think British soaps today are truer to what Irna Phillips created than are American soaps today. That's why Eileen Fulton loves EastEnders, and why she said it's like how ATWT was when she started there.

Also, I would say that British soaps have made major improvements to the artform. For one thing, British soaps have successfully targeted themselves to both men and women by telling the right mix of stories with the right mix of characters to achieve that -- expanding beyond what is still perceived to be a female audience for soaps in the US -- thus pushing soaps into the mainstream consciousness and drawing top writing talent and high levels of network attention to soaps in the UK to an extent only dreamed of in the US, dwarfing even the success of, say, primetime soaps "Dallas" or "Dynasty" here.

By the way, I forgot to say, I need to admit to having a very limited knowledge of soaps around the world in posting on this thread. I've really only had exposure to US and UK soaps, and even then I haven't watched all of them. It's quite possible that the best soaps could be, say, Korean or Indian -- for instance the Indian TV serial Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi (Because the Mother-In-Law Was Once a Daughter-In-Law Too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @P.J. Well, it wasn't her first award. I am sure she has written books, and spoken at colleges, and gotten some notoriety from it. Most importantly, she is fulfilled. Something Dani is not.  @Paul Raven Exactly, it does not ring true to me. Dani has that big personality because she is masking pain. And she probably clung to Bill because he made her feel smart and important (at one point). There are ways to add more layers to her.
    • Absolutely. And IIRC Rose Alaio has mentioned production having it out for her.
    • That goes back to Chance/Abby-there was way more to explore with their marriage but the first problem that pops up that's pretty much it-moving on. And Kyle/Lola, years worth of story dropped so he can fall back in love with Summer. Sharon/Rey married off with no plans for their future so they kill him off. And so on...
    • All of that would be interesting. Why would JG ever do that?
    • GH 1976 Pt 2 Medical student Bobby Chandler’s bone-marrow test results are in, and Steve Hardy has the difficult task of telling him he has Malenkov’s Disease, a rare and fatal blood disease. Bobby, newly married Samantha, hears his one-year-maximum prognosis and insists that Steve not tell anyone, as he has to have time to work out his own feelings. To cover up the treatments he’ll be starting immediately, Bobby, with Steve, decides to tell his family he has mononucleosis. His wife and his mother, Caroline, accept this story, but attorney Lee Baldwin senses it’s much more and presses Bobby for the truth, then promising to keep Bobby’s secret. Even though Bobby moves into a state of remission, Lee realizes the gravity of the problem and moves his wedding to Caroline forward, assuring Bobby that he will always be there for both Caroline and Sammi. But Bobby’s remission is short-lived, and his symptoms are now more severe, requiring frequent whole-blood transfusions. And a new experimental drug he is taking holds the threat of serious side effects. Sammi learns that Bobby’s attempt to buy life insurance was turned down and, herself a nurse, realizes that his symptoms are more severe than mono. She tries to press Leslie for the truth, but Leslie can’t violate a patient’s confidence. She does, however, pressure Bobby to let Sammi share is with him. Bobby insists that he can’t; he won’t send her into mourning while he’s still there to watch. But Sammi, angry at being treated like a child, presses the issue and manages to find out the truth. She then asks Lee to convince Bobby that his mother must be told so they can all show him the love they have for him before it’s too late and they have only  regrets for what went unsaid. Lee agrees, and after the wedding he protectively tells Caroline the truth. Sammi then tells Bobby that she is pregnant, news that he receives with very mixed emotions. Steve hits an optimistic note when he tells Bobby that a new breakthrough in leukemia chemotherapy may help him in his fight for life. This new treatment calls for more extensive testing, and Steve is overjoyed to find that there has been a variation in Bobby’s condition which indicates that he -doesn’t have Malenkov’s Disease after all. His condition, while serious, can be successfully treated  extensive drug therapy in New York, and Lee quickly arranges for all of them to move there so they can support Bobby during the extensive treatment and long recovery.  Dr. Jim Hobart and his wife, Audrey, are continuing their therapy sessions, trying to decide if they have a future together. Audrey admits she has stayed with Jim only because he needed her while he was drinking, and he in turn admits that he knows Audrey married him not out of love but out of gratitude for saving her son Tommy’s life in surgery. When Jim finally tells Audrey that he created his own alcoholic abyss and blamed her only because she was conveniently close, she wonders what will happen to: her when he recovers. If he doesn’t need her, can she go on? Does she need so much to be needed? When Jim, improving, starts teaching at the local college, he finds his self-image improving. But Audrey, worn out from therapy, suggests that she take a short vacation alone. Jim sees this as a way of undermining his recent strides and is angry. He relates this situation to his recent impotence, caused by his emotional problems. Jim reacts to his own feelings of inadequacy by withdrawing from Audrey, treating her impersonally and coldly. She takes this as an indication of her own failure. But when Jim reacts enthusiastically to one of his students, lovely young Sally Grimes, Audrey questions her own responsibility for the situation and accepts a dinner invitation with Steve Hardy, her first husband. Steve’s reassurance that she’s been a paragon of tolerance is negated when Jim walks in late and showing signs of drinking. When she asks how he could do it, he bitterly replies, “It’s a way to help me escape from you,” and turns and leaves. He goes to Sally’s, where they make love. When Sally later expresses regret at interfering in his marriage, Jim assures her there was nothing left to spoil—his wife is frigid but has blamed their sexual failure on him; thanks to Sally, he now knows he’s not inadequate. Since Sally won’t have an affair with a married man, Jim decides to make the break with Audrey. He bit- _ terly tells her Sally proved to him that he never had a problem—all he needed was a real woman, not one who was all burned out. He scathingly says that she takes men and castrates them; cases in point, her three husbands: Steve Hardy, Tom Baldwin, and himself. Shocked and horribly hurt by his accusations, Audrey swallows sleeping pills but immediately realizes the folly of her actions and tries to get help. Steve, meanwhile, senses something wrong and on a hunch goes to her apartment, where he finds her unconscious. He rushes her to the hospital for treatment, and after sixteen hours she begins to come around. She tearfully repeats Jim’s accusations while still groggy, and Steve reassures her that nothing Jim said was in any way true. As she dozes in the security of his presence, he whispers to her, “There’s a lot of woman in you, there was and there is, my sweet, lovely Audrey.”  Nurse Beth Maynard, despite her frequent pronouncements that she’s immune to emotional involvement, has fallen in love with resident Kyle Bradley. Beth’s sister, Nurse Diana Taylor, feels that Kyle treats Beth as if she were a casual conquest, however, rather than a woman he loves. Kyle’s life is now complicated by the arrival of Nurse Kate Marshall in town. She is staying with her godmother, Jessie Brewer, R.N., while. she recovers from a painful divorce. She and Kyle had an affair a few years ago, and she knows he’s married but keeps his wife “under wraps.” Kyle, in turn, knows that the discovery of Kate’s affair with Dr. John McAllister drove his wife to suicide. Kyle and Kate resume their affair. Despite the fact that Kyle is now living with Beth, Diana has seen enough to convince her that Kyle is deceiving her sister. But Beth won’t believe this, until she sees them embracing herself. When she confronts Kate, Kate bitterly tells Beth everything past and present about herself and Kyle, including the interesting fact that he’s married. Beth, shocked and hurt, throws Kyle out, and Jessie, who overheard Kate’s vindictive diatribe to Beth, arranges her transfer to another hospital.     
    • This is so true - the instant love is annoying. Adam/Sally/Billy/Chelsea are the best evidence of why this rings hollow. While I can see Adam/Chelsea reuniting based on a long history and Connor, there's no way Sally would instantly declare love. While Billy is just a desperate soul, Sally would be far more cautious after what happened with Adam. The *real* Sally would not only scheme to get Adam back, but make Chelsea's life difficult. She just got over it and gave up. Please. Instead of insta-love why can't some of these characters more casual? I hope Claire flings with Holden after Kyle falls into Audra's trap. Abby turns to Nate when Devon obsesses over Amanda - even if she's not in town. Lauren turns to Jack during this Michael stress, who in turn lands in Diane's web. We need messy triangles/quads and more.
    • Literally looks like a damn VFA or bingo hall. But we’re supposed to believe high rollers go there.
    • More 1976 LOL Carrie is very afraid that Ian’s paying her bills will force Arlene into a relationship with him she doesn’t want. She asks Joe if there’s some way to give Ian  back the money. Joe tells Arlene that her mother’s afraid of the situation, but Arlene assures him that the only thing she fears is that Tom will find out and think she’s more than a friend to Ian. Betsy, understandably resentful of Arlene, can’t see what her brother sees in her and is upset to see Arlene with Ian, as she’s sure Tom will be hurt. Tom is initially quite angry when he happens to learn that Ian paid Carrie’s hospital bills in full but believes Arlene when she assures him Ian’s just a friend. Ian, meanwhile, after Arlene admits she has strong feelings for a young doctor and can therefore regard Ian only as a friend, puts the pieces together and makes an appointment to see Tom for a cardiac examination. Tom realizes why Ian has chosen him and refuses a considerable fee to become Ian’s personal physician. . Betsy has suggested that Tom not ask Arlene to Meg’s formal New Year’s Eve party for the sake of all concerned. Meg, while having Carrie alter her party dress, mentions she’s being escorted by a wealthy man but doesn’t mention Ian by name. Ian had asked  Arlene to fly to Mexico with him for the New Year, but she declined, explaining she had another date. Tom, seeing how left out she feels, tells Arlene they are going to Meg’s party after all, and she begins looking for a dress, unable to afford the type of smashing creation she really wants. Ian, learning that Arlene’s  looking for a dress suitable for Meg’s party, arranges to have a designer creation sent in place of the off the rack dress she selected. When it arrives, Arlene and Carrie immediately plan to return it, but, on second thought, Arlene decides it wouldn’t hurt if she wore it just this once.  Ben Harper is released from prison, and Betsy tries - to show him they have nothing left between them by dating Jamie. However, her feelings for Ben get in the way of her enjoying Jamie’s company. Jamie has decided to accept an out-of-town law firm’s offer and, before leaving, helps Diana arrange the passport requirements for her newly arranged missionary trainee post in Peru. Diana tells Jamie she’s finally found peace except for her sadness at having to leave Johnny  behind. Beaver Ridge has continued to deteriorate since Rick left Meg in control, and Jamie warns Rick that since he owns fifty-one percent of the club, he’ll have to come up with fifty-one percent of the money needed to put the place back on its feet. Cal has mentioned to Rick that she would rather have a smaller, more informal home than his imposing house, and when she learns he’s put the house on the market she assumes he’s considering her desire for an easier home to run. Rick is determined that Cal not know the full extent of his financial problems. Since she wants it so badly, Rick promises Cal he’ll buy the mill house as their home, but he refuses adamantly to accept money from her trust fund toward the purchase, recalling the trouble resulting from the last time he borrowed  money from a woman—her mother, Meg.  Ian informs Ray that he'll get his cut of Beaver Ridge only when he, Ian, has the controlling interest.  When Rick can’t raise his share of the Beaver Ridge capital, he approaches Ray for help. Ray sends him to Ian, who refusés to make a loan, explaining it’s his firm policy, but suggests he pay one hundred thousand ~ dollars for two percent of Rick’s holdings in Beaver Ridge, thus transferring majority ownership to himself. Rick thinks it over and realizes he has no choice but to accept. He hates losing control of Beaver Ridge but  feels his first responsibility is Cal and he must protect her from his financial worries. Ben has moved in with Van and Bruce, explaining to Meg that he wants no help and no coddling, he has to make it on his own. He manages to find a job as a salesman in a sporting-goods shop, despite his parole. Betsy hires Carrie as Suzanne’s baby sitter in order to be absent when Ben visits his daughter. Ben finally tells Betsy he’d hoped there was still a chance for them despite everything but her dating Jamie and avoiding him seems to mean he was mistaken. Betsy admits she’s no longer seeing Jamie and agrees to be home when Ben visits. They then call a truce and decide to attend Meg’s party together.  
    • A few years after my grandfather and great aunt passed away, my grandmother married her widowed brother-in-law. You could have knocked us all over with a feather when they told us. My point is: it happens in RL, a lot more often than people think. In the Jack/Siobhan case, it would have been super messy, which is exactly what you want on a soap. Putting Siobhan with Joe forced them to write her as very naive and gullible, which seemed totally wrong for the character they initially introduced. I liked Rose, too, but that story also got derailed by the stupid mob stuff.
    • Dani's past is worth examining. OK she was an international model, but settled for an up and coming lawyer and quit modelling on his say? Doesn't hold together for me. They need a better reason for her giving that up. Maybe due to some incident, her star was falling and Bill helped her? She must have been in awe of him to put up with the infidelities and it seems she didn't stray herself. Though we have seen flashbacks of them in happier times, so maybe Bill was charming enough to convince her that he really loved her. Did her parents apply pressure? Maybe they disliked Bill and she married out of rebellion and then refused to leave to avoid the "I told you so's" And what was it about Hayley that caused Bill to finally divorce Dani? Lot's of motivations that need to be explored.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy