Jump to content

DAYS: Hogan Sheffers ORIGINAL Interview


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm very weird on Days right now.

On one hand, I do enjoy the characters that are frontburner. I like Steve and Kayla... not 'hardcore' on them like some are, but I like them well enough. And I love Nichols. Nick and Chelsea are fantastic, the both actors are great. Max and Abby aren't bad. And I love Martha Madison/Brandon Beemer as Shawn and Belle.

However, even though I like everyone that's on the frontburner right now, it's still no excuse for backburnering the vets. I like the 'newbies,' but I like the veterans too... for me, they are the show. I'm all for rotation, but it's time to bring J/M and B/H back to the frontburner. They need stories. Not just scenes, but stories... stories of their own. It's sad that the show might not be able to afford using them regularly.

As for the budget issues, I can see it plain as day. Sets are smaller. All the action seems to take place in one location throughout the week to keep from having to put up different sets each day. It's nothing that really jumps out at you, but little things start to add up and when you end up looking back at older episodes, you realize, "Damn, the show looks really tight-budgeted now." And that, for some reason, tends to take away from my enjoyment of the show. I know it shouldn't, but it does.

And the background music is still such a huge issue. Scenes that should be uber-dramatic are given the most dull background music, and it completely takes away from the scene, causing it to fall flat. A good example are the recent scenes when Kayla removed John's kidney. That should've been played with huge dramatic pull, and yet it was treated like a filler scene the way it was shot and edited. Because of that, there's not alot of things that make me say, "Wow, I have to tune in tomorrow!" Even if there's something I'm looking forward to, I don't really have an excitement to see it because I just know it'll be played flat. That's not really the fault of the writing, I don't think... it's all a failure in execution.

Anyway, the show isn't bad right now. The characters featured aren't bad... in fact, they're quite good. But I'm missing certain elements. While I'm thankful that the show has hired talented actors to play the newer characters, and I'm thankful that the writing team has given the new characters plenty of layers, they aren't "Days of Our Lives." I'm missing MY SHOW. What I'm seeing isn't horrible... a little boring at the moment, yes. But not horrible, not a crazed JER-induced acid trip. And despite enjoying certain things, I keep tuning in and thinking, "Where's my show?" Days might've had its flaws over the past ten years, but I've always appreciated that it was recognizable. And right now, there are many things that I just don't recognize and it's causing me to yearn for a little familiarity. I want my Bo and Hope! And cheesy as they may be, John and Marlena are integral and belong on the frontburner. Hell, I'd even do backflips for Jack and Jennifer to return. Chelsea, Nick, Billie, Kate, Steve and Kayla can only take the show so far before balance needs to be renewed and Days returns to the ensemble multi-family show I've always known it to be. Knowing that Days (as I know it, anyway) will be gone in 2009, I'm just wanting a few final kickass years for the vets. I don't want 'em going away prematurely! They should be used as much as possible right now, to give the fans a few really good final memories... right now, especially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They may be doubling up and taping two shows a day. That is nothing new to soaps. And it gives more reason to think that they shut down production to save money, not to adjust to changes in the writing.

ETA: Passions has been taping two shows a day for years in November and December so the cast can take two weeks off for the Holidays. Other soaps tape two shows a day sometimes for various reason as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy