Jump to content

20 - 40% of Homeless Youth are Gay...


KLN

Recommended Posts

  • Members

San Francisco Chronicle

Many gay youth are homeless

Group constitutes big share of young people on streets

Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Homelessness is rampant among young people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, according to a report released Tuesday by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the National Coalition for the Homeless. While gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people constitute between 3 and 5 percent of the general population, they make up 20 to 40 percent of homeless youth in the United States, according to the report.

In San Francisco, between 700 and 1,300 homeless people ages 12 to 24 are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, according to local organizations that work with homeless youth.

"This report documents that there is an epidemic of homelessness of LGBT youth, and at the same time it's a national disgrace that the national government has completely failed to respond," said Matt Foreman, executive director of the task force, which is based in New York.

The report examines the problem and calls for federal spending to help this portion of the homeless youth population.

"There are a multitude of reasons these youth become homeless, but ultimately, family conflict is the major cause," said Nicholas Ray, the author of the report.

Once homeless, the young people face a minefield of substance abuse, depression and risky sexual behavior, including selling sex for money or shelter, according to the report.

Angelika Torres, a 20-year-old transgender woman who grew up in Manhattan, said she left her home after being forced to cut her hair and act more like a boy. She now lives in transitional housing there. "One thing I know from my own experience is that this needs to stop. Kids cannot live like this," Torres said during a press conference on the report Tuesday.

The report, partially released in December, is based on numerous estimates and studies but no scientific counts.

It states that youths often face harassment or discrimination in shelters and that less than $1 million of the $105 million the federal government spends to fund the Runaway, Homeless and Missing Children Protection Act goes to organizations that work exclusively with them.

Many kids who leave their homes go to New York and San Francisco, which are viewed as bastions of support for gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, queer and questioning people in need. But reality in those cities can be harsh, especially with regard to housing, said Jodi Schwartz, executive director of Lavender Youth Recreation & Information Center in San Francisco.

"They've come to the golden city for queer folks and expect to find everything they need here, and they find they're landing in a city like any other and there's no place to go," she said.

Schwartz said most of the young people who come to her organization, known as LYRIC, identify as "gender queer," a label they use to define themselves outside traditional sexual orientation or gender roles.

Even in San Francisco, there are just 25 subsidized housing units designed specifically for formerly homeless gay youth, created two years ago with $750,000 in city funding. Advocates said the housing, which includes mental health services and other support, is helpful but inadequate to meet the need.

About one-tenth of the funding the city gives Larkin Street Youth Services is for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender services. Executive director Sherilyn Adams estimates that 30 to 35 percent of the city's homeless youth are gay, lesbian, transgender or bisexual.

Adams said the city, which contracts with Larkin Street to house homeless youth, should be lobbying the state and federal government for more funding.

"San Francisco should be the leader in the care of youth who are pushed out of their homes or communities because of their sexual orientation," Adams said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

And as I mentioned in another thread, it's been confirmed that the Salvation Army will turn away helping homeless gay youth if they've been kicked out of their homes for that reason.

Need has no orientation, you assholes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its easy to understand why.

I was lucky. When I was 18 and came out, my father's initial reaction was that of hatred and I was thrown out for a year. Fortunately, I had friends who I could stay with and get myself together. Even more fortunate that my father eventually came around.

I know a lot of people from going out that are homeless and rely on staying from place to place so that they don't sleep in the park, or worse. A lot of them are resorting to escorting to keep themselves fed. It's heartbreaking. :(

And as for the Salvation Army, they can suck the big one. How dare they turn away someone in need because they happen to like what they like in the bedroom? :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

see, i am the gay teenager that has the house that everyone who gets kicked out comes to. im lucky. my paents love me.. my mom loves that im gay and my dad, well he kinda puts up with it since he thinks me n my bestfriend r more than that n he really likes him.

and as for the SalArm... wtf is wrong with them>!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Salvation Army is a Christian organization, so it's not surprising they would turn away homeless gays. If they believe homosexuality is a Biblical sin they're not going to assist those they consider breaking God's word.

People should be helped regardless of their sexual orientation. People should be helped period. Homelessness is a serious problem, but it's even more dangerous for gays and lesbians, considering this country has a huge number of homophobes, some who will use violence to get their feelings of hate across.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
    • Might as well say it, Minority opinion, granted, but I like Joss & I'm okay with this WSB story & i hope that Emma will be their next recruit & she & Joss can be partners.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy