Jump to content

Taylor Hicks Article/Interview about his new CD


R!ck

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Hicks plans to stick with his own style

Soul man: Season 5 American Idol winner Taylor Hicks' self-titled album contains songs in his swamp-shaded blend of pop, funk and soul that he calls "modern womp." "The thread of this album is groove," the singer says.

By Edna Gundersen, USA TODAY

CALABASAS, Calif. — Taylor Hicks knew the bum rap on American Idol winners. Since the 2002 coronation of Kelly Clarkson, they've been regarded as empty vessels shuttled through a gantlet of songwriters, producers and industry honchos eager to committee-cobble a debut album packed with bankable hits.

This champ had his dukes up.

"I'm not a piece of clay ready to be molded," he told veteran producer Matt Serletic at their initial meeting last summer. "I'm pre-sculpted."

To Hicks' relief, the pair clicked immediately and set out to showcase the gravel-voiced Alabama belter in a Taylor-made disc that plumbed his Southern roots and soulful style. The 12-track Taylor Hicks, due Tuesday, includes a cover of Marvin Gaye's Wherever I Lay My Hat, tunes by Rob Thomas and Paul Peña, and Bryan Adams' The Right Place, penned for Ray Charles, who died before he could record it. Hicks wrote Soul Thing and The Deal.

"The thread of this album is groove," the silver-haired singer says, applying the term "modern womp" to his swamp-shaded blend of pop, funk and soul.

"I made sure it's not shaped the way anyone other than myself wants it. I understand the business. You can't give up your artistic integrity. The backbone of this music is who I am as an artist. I can honestly say every song is a direct representation of me."

Serletic, who has produced hits by Santana, Matchbox Twenty and Aerosmith, says working with Hicks was "an exciting process. He's such a warm guy, very much a musician, and he knows the history of soul music. He and I were on the same mission to make a record that felt good and had great songs and lyrics with a strong emotional connection."

The songs play to Hicks' strength as "a fantastic singer who sings his heart out and passionately commits to performing," he says. "There's something old-school about that. He could bring soul music forward."

Music journalist Rona Elliot, who served on USA TODAY's American Idol coaching panel, sees the album as a compromise between Hicks' desire for a Soul Patrol jalopy and American Idol's bid for a marketable vehicle.

"Taylor's voice is crisp and clear, rich and soulful throughout," Elliot says. "His backup singers and musicians are impeccable. The rhythm and musicianship are tight and bright. So the production values are great. There are soaring power ballads that lift you up and pop ditties I'd rather live without.

"(He's) honoring his influences, but I don't hear the originality I think the guy is capable of. He is not Van Morrison, Joe Cocker or Leon Russell. He's establishing his own musical footing but has only taken baby steps."

Since winning the show's fifth run with 63 million votes, Hicks has been in AmericanIdol overdrive, completing a summer tour with fellow finalists before hammering out the CD in seven weeks of 18-hour days.

"This pace, it's like I'm trying to find the phone booth to put on the Superman outfit," Hicks says during a recent break at an inconspicuous recording studio in the hills above the San Fernando Valley.

He chats about his consuming career in tones amiable and solemn, dialing back the exuberance of his Idol show persona.

"It's been tough, but I understand that when there's a demand, you have to supply," he says.

He recalls all too vividly a preceding decade of low demand as he toured the South's roadhouse circuit fantasizing about a record deal.

He says, "I slept, ate and breathed my dream, and nobody discouraged me," which is why not a single pal chided him when he fled to Las Vegas for American Idol auditions. He had a modest aim.

"I got on the show to sing and find a decent agent to book me at fraternity parties," he says.

Instead he became Gray Charles, the Motown throwback whose blue-eyed soul and goofy dance steps upstaged his pop-leaning competitors. He believes age (30) and experience proved vital in his victory.

"I started with Ray Charles as the foundation," he says. "He taught me what a good song is. That's all that mattered. I studied Van Morrison, Bob Seger, Supertramp, Jose Feliciano, Run-DMC. I tried to sing like Ray, Etta James, Elvis, Aretha."

At 14, he was playing harmonica in blues bars. He taught himself to play guitar.

Soon he was on the road making a living when he didn't have to resort to odd jobs: playing the Easter bunny in a mall, stripping floors in a nursing home. A dozen years passed before Idol catapulted him to the national stage. He's pouring his pre-Idol memories into a book.

"You can learn a lot from the back highways of Alabama and Georgia and the trials and tribulations I went through to get heard," he says. "I was a struggling musician and a struggling accountant. It's a great motivator."

Hicks released two albums back then. The first, In Your Time, sold 1,500 copies. His American Idol single, Do I Make You Proud, a slice of cheese that he was reluctant to record, sold 190,000 copies its first week.

Had he failed Idol's audition, "I probably would have gotten a small independent record deal," he says. "I would have stayed at it. I was getting there in my own little way."

He's aware that American Idol's 30-million-plus viewers don't flock en masse to record stores.

"It doesn't bother me," he says. "My mentality is to try to write and produce a great album. I can't speculate or worry about something I have no control over, like the record-buying public.

"The show was the greatest opportunity I've ever had. It allowed me to create this record and further my career. It served its purpose, and now I have to move on and be Taylor Hicks."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • A kind angel has added both episodes to the vault (UK Diva TV broadcast version). 
    • Yes, I think that is the most likely situation.  TPTB were unhappy with the offer(s) they got from the tourism board in Finland, and decided the trip was going to be too expensive for P&G/NBC to finance alone.   I would also speculate a similar situation likely occurred a few years later with the planned location shoot in Egypt, which was also cancelled after the storyline had already started, and changed to Arizona.  
    • What else? #May4th

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • In my usual account on my most used video hosting site with the video title  DAYS 1-8-15 Will & Paul Sex This is an edit I began when I was first teaching myself to edit & at that time I couldn't make it do what I wanted it to do. I pulled it up & finished it this morning. 
    • Or Megan is shot as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts...while Julie confesses she's the biological mother of Special Guest Star Barry Bostwick's little boy.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy