Jump to content

Saw III


alwaysAMC

Recommended Posts

  • Members

So I saw Saw III yesterday. I loved loved loved the first 2, so I was really excited about this new one.

Well, it was overall good. Gets better in the second half - the first half seems thrown together, but then it makes better sense closer to the end. Anyway - I didn't come out of there thinking "HOLY [!@#$%^&*]!" like I did with the first two - but it was a good wrap-up to the trilogy. Brought the first two movies, and this one, to a nice little packaged close. So for that, I appreciate and accept this movie into the trilogy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

omigod.

I still have not seen any of the SAWS yet.

I have the first one...that has been sitting on the shelf for months now.

I'm just too freaked to put it on. :unsure::blink:

I just need to grow a pair and go watch it.

Maybe tomorrow...or like next week or something.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will watch it...I swear.

I just need more time to work myself up to it.

I'm 30 years old...and scared out of my mind of these movies!

Somehow I became lame with my oldness.

I just don't want see body parts being chopped off all over the place.

I would never want anyone to cut me...unless it's the fat off my a ss. :lol:

Maybe a drink or 3 might help.

Jack Daniels can make anything better.....and prettier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The first Saw was good. I loved the twist ending. But I don't feel the need to see the sequels.

I wish Hollywood would stop this trend of "torture horror." I prefer psychos with big ol' butcher knives chasing stupid teenagers around and ghosts scaring the pee out of people. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

I went to Saw III over the weekend and really enjoyed it. I thought it tied together and wrapped up the first two nicely, although I didn't realize why the one gal was important til the end. Someone was telling me there will be a Saw IV out next October again but I'm not sure how they'd do that. :huh

It was fairly gory, but nothing worse than the first or second.

And I agree.....ghost stories are WAY scarier for me. I'm going to try and see Grudge 2 soon,

that will be much scarier for me. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Oh wow! She's only 15, but I guess with shorter streaming seasons that might not be an issue.    Her dad, Dean Armstrong, played Blake on Queer as Folk (US) btw.
    • I hadn't thought of this and this is a great call out! 
    • Imagine the possibilities if Mary was the politically correct moral center of the Loves and clashed with Donna over her snobby socialite tendencies (once the re-recast was done).
    • Show starts soon. Wonder if we will get the Voice saying "The role of Ted Richardson is now being played by Keith Robinson" and if they'll update the intro
    • I initially thought BTG was going for the Duprees being (somewhat) like the Kennedy family- wealthy and politically influential. And Martin's accident being like how Chappaquiddick (Link) caused Ted Kennedy to cancel his plans to run for president in the 1970s.  (He ran in 1980 but didn't get the nomination). But now it seems to have more layers that that, so I have no idea.
    • The episodes uploaded today by the YT channel have been done through the end of November 1985 and what a mess we have in the Liza/Sunny/Hogan/Lloyd/Estelle story. I think it would have been easier to gradually bring Hogan/Sunny back together.. maybe even addressing the toxic situation and trying to work through it.   Unrelated to all that, I see that Gary Tomlin has attempted to reset the show to where it was when he left at the end of 1983.  He really seems obsessed with regressing Wendy as a character after the progress/evolution of her character post 1983.. with her sleeping with her mother's new boyfriend.   Based on what I've watched of the show online... the one consistency was the mother/daughter relationship between Stephanie/Wendy... and even though Stephanie was recast, I think violating that relationship was a mistake. I can see why Tomlin didn't last long in this stint as head writer.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I don't think that would be the reason tbh. Thinking about it, it's probably storyline related - I could see bio mom / dad eventually turning up (or maybe it's June as speculated) and wanting the children back. I could also see it being a part of the fall-out of Martin's secret being revealed now that he's backed down from a presidential campaign - his and Smitty's ability to be parents comes into question, which the bio parents use. They might've wanted the kids to be at a age where they could reliably speak for themselves what they prefer, but also have enough memories of their bio parent(s) not doing a good job. I'd also think that they might want to avoid having the image of this gay couple keeping a mother away from her small children, as it might skew the viewer to sympathise too much in one direction. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy