Jump to content

August 7-11, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Given that Soapnet Reveals is featuring David Fumero, Mel Gallo, Kamar and Bree, and the big tease secret is 'Will Spenser be nailed for the murder of Thomas McBain?', I'd say the latter is more likely, even with the rumor of Higley out in October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

All I am going to say is I responded the way I did because of the nature of the Days posts. More than any other show I have ever watched - all you hear about are the couples, and I only watch because of this couple or I only came back because of this couple. I very rarely read that ever from ATWT fans at all. The very vast majority of fans of ATWT watch the show and like the whole show or none of it. We all have our faves but we do not desert the show if our faves happen to not be on.

Days used to have those type of fans - even when the quality wasn't so good in the early 80's you still had those fans.

And yes I have quit watching the show GBB - for various reasons. I was already getting restless with the show in May, but still enjoyed it better than I had in awhile. I got very restless with the show when Steve and Kayla returned, and they were on alot. As I have said I don't really like them as a couple, but I still watched. And then my mother got worse and I started missing shows alot. Pretty soon I just got out of the habit of watching, and I found out I didn't miss it at all. And what I was reading on the boards was mostly about Steve and Kayla and I didn't even want to tune in to find out what was going on.

I have been a viewer of Days since 1970. I never thought I would quit watching it. The year 2006 goes down as a year I quit watching 3 of my all time favorite shows. I quit All My Children after watching it for 30 plus years, and I quit watching OLTL which I had watched for almost 30 years off and on. What is weird is that when I quit watching AMC and OLTL, I still for about 2 weeks caught myself sneaking and watching a few minutes, but surprisingly when I quit watching Days I have not even turned it back on. Even my love for Bo & Hope just doesn't even interest me at this point.

My argument was not about the ones who have completely quit at this point, but about those who only tune in for specific days or couples or performers. When I watched I watched the whole show and watched or taped everyday. I never found myself ff'ing any of it either. Days has got to have consistency in the ratings. Those 2.8's were totally negated by the 2.5's it had the rest of the week.

And yes Ponz or whoever you can blame the same fan bases who bring in the high numbers for the low numbers. What good are the high numbers if the low numbers negate them, and they do. From what we are reading (and that is all that I or anyone can base it on) is that they are not watching on those days. At least that is what we hear from the majority - so yes they might be responsible for the high numbers but those same fans and fan bases are responsible for the low numbers too.

Edited to add: I still love the show, and that is the reason I am so passionate about it in my arguments. I do not want the show to be cancelled but I just don't see the show ever getting the ratings it needs unless the fans support the whole show at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My only guess is that someone at ABC really believes that one character can carry a show...and that character is John McBain. I doubt anyone there has even correlated what happened with Port Charles with what is happening at OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Steve, you've missed the point that both GBB and I were making. On their own, hardcore fanbase members don't have the power to impact the ratings. As GBB said, EVERY SINGLE ONLINE J&M FAN could tune in and the numbers would not budge. Same applies to J&J and S&K fans. The numbers move when the stories are good enough to attract enough general fans. That was why I mentioned S&K generating positive buzz from people who aren't "offficial" S&K fans. The S&K storyline is not brillaint- not by a long stretch- but surely no one can deny it's a step above the never-ending Quads of Doom stories . That is why (IMO) people tuned in on Monday/Tuesday but left in droves the rest of the week.

There's a tendency (and I've been guilty of this too) to assume that online fans are somehow representative of all DAYS viewers. In reality, we represent only a very small minority. It would be a fallacy to assume that our motivations for watching/not watching are the same as the average fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What is the point of wishing they tank? The budget is tied to the ratings so if the ratings go up, there is a greater chance of Matt being called back. I would not blame Matt if he told the show to go straight to hell for treating him like garbage. For whatever reason, though, he seems to not be holding a grudge and would consider a return. I am going to respect that.

Also- as angry as TPTB make me- I could never wish cancellation on any show (which is what would happen if the ratings continue to slide) . Corday and his cronies are financially secure but many of the actors are not. They are the ones who would suffer the most from the show being cancelled. And many fans still enjoy the show too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've often wondered how many of the McBain fans at OLTL were also PC fans and how many of the fans who have no use for ME/John were not PC fans.

Still, if they have any thought that ME can carry this show after the numbers from the prior year they deserve to be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is a cycle. You get what you feed, and the longer you feed it, the more trapped you are. There is no doubt they have feasted a certain portion of Micheal Easton's fanbase ( Even some of his fans are equally disgusted with the writing and wanted him to leave.) However, after years of giving him the lion's share of story and airtime, that IS who is watching the show -- others have or are tuning out. It'd be a very risky decision to step out of that cycle, and they'd need a very strong character/story to do it . I don't see FV as that man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Anecdotally, I have a dozen friends on another internet site (LiveJournal), none of whom go to soap boards at all. But they all have returned to watching Days again after many years away because of Steve and Kayla's return. And like you, they all ff over everything else on the show, or they watch and mock it later on. Heh.

<--watches ATWT and GH, and has never understood the appeal of Days :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The way we are going to get people to tune into our show and stayed tuned in is to go to a format where the stories are characters are more random than usual. By tuning into the opening Act of the, you are able to see who is going to be shown for the day. Since the Cordays back Y&R as well as Days, they should begin to use some common sense and show more than the same old faces for the whole show. With them dragging the stroylines the way they are, they would be easier to follow if more than the same people are shown for the whole day.

What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy