Those strings were bloodcurdling.
One thing I really have to applaud Marland for is, he may not have created the best female characters but he wrote a lot of strong, complex female characters, even the ones he didn't create. And thank God he didn't give a hoot about whether they were considered 'likeable'.
As much as I loved Y&R growing up (it was my 2nd favorite after ATWT), there is a long history of paternalistic writing on Y&R that is very common to a lot of soap writing.
(Bell himself wasn't immune to it, though what saves his credentials is that he created Jill Foster, one of the most feminist characters I've seen on any daytime soap, IMO) .
Even when the headwriters of some soaps are women, I've quite often seen paternalistic writing flowing from their pens as well.
I didn't get that sense with the characters that Marland wrote--even some of the 'weaker' ones, Beatrice, even Angel-- gain their sense of autonomy, at some point.
I could never see Marland writing a matriarchal Nikki Newman, for example. There would have had to be some twist to it.
Nikki would've either had to have her children or her husband (preferably all) under her thumb or simply take lovers or be the Queen Bee of Genoa City's society, freezing people out at will. A grown as* woman (not a child or naif like Angel/Roseanna) with all that wealth yet still subjecting herself to her husband's whims would've been inconceiveable from Marland's pen.