Jump to content

Movie Reviews


Maxim

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

2/10

This doesn't feel like a movie, but more like a computer game. The cringe robotic cat that is always silent and completely unrealistic adds up to that effect. Not scary. Just bland. Was falling asleep. Expected much MORE. 

NEEEXT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

We are finally going to see Longlegs tonight! It's finally in cinemas all around town.

We are going in 4 hours and I'm already soo excited. I've been dying to see this movie for a year now.

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

10 OUT OF F-CKING 10

WOW!

I can't say how much I LOVED this movie. I used to be a huge horror fan back in the day, and I'm a true crime researcher, so it DOES take a lot to scare me and disturb me. LIKE A-LOT. But just hearing the strange feminine voice of Nicholas Cage's serial killer in the first minutes of the movie... made my blood go cold. What a monster of character Cage created! This will be studied for decades, believe me! It's Baby Jane and Joker level of legendary. 

I was feeling uneasy and wanting to leave the cinema after the first 5 minutes. If it wasn't for my husband, I probably would have left. I even stood up and tried to couple of times, but he stopped me. I'm a 29 year old man and I watch The Bold And The Beautiful - it takes a lot to scare me! 

The movie is for 16+ age group, so you can guess how unsettling it is. It starts terrorizing you in the first couple of minutes and doesn't let you have a calm minute till the end.  BRUTAL. I can't believe I didn't go out of the cinema. 

The face of Longlegs has literally been engraved in my mind right now... and I don't know how I'm going to sleep.  

It goes straight to Number 1 of my list of horror movies.

BRAVA! It's doing amazing box office right now too! 

I recommend it only to people who have healthy mental situations and can handle disturbing things. I don't recommend to people who haven't regularly watched horror movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

We spend money on tickets and food for this piece of [!@#$%^&*] in the cinema... that I will need therapy to forget how bad it was.

A complete disgrace and joke compared to the original. It felt like a teen-parody. Bad acting. Cringe scenes. Absurd. 

0/10 - the worst movie I've seen in my entire life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

I don't care about the hate that Blake Lively's been getting. I don't care if she is a mean girl in her real life or not... I only care that she gives a performance of a lifetime in this movie.

I left the theatre with tears in my eyes. A stunning performance, that made me re-live part of my childhood. Deals with the important and hard issue of domestic abuse.

Stunning, hard to swallow, making you question things in your life, movie.

10/10! 

I really don't care about the haters and people saying the movie is bad just to pile on the Blake Lively hate train.

It's not bad. It's not good. It's a masterpiece. Yes, melodramatic, but still masterpiece.

Rocked me to my core!

Please register in order to view this content

@Liberty City

@Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

7/10

The first one hour is solid 10/10, but the last 45 minutes have a lot of cringe moments and unbelievable twists... that I still enjoyed, but the movie slipped into American Horror Story level of camp while at first it had more class.

I loved it though, since it kept me interested and for a person with ADHD like me... this is hard to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

Please register in order to view this content

4.5/10

So disappointed. I had bigger hopes for this movie based on the trailer. But I should finally learn my lesson that is - the best movies always have bad trailers and vice versa.

The first 30-50 minutes it was building up nicely and I would have given it a solid 6,5 - 7, but then the second half ruined what it build up.

It took everything that worked in Rosemary's baby and turned it into the most basic Netflix-type movie style of film-making. So uninspired and reductive.

And the worst part of the whole experience was that this movie was not creepy or scary AT ALL. I was waiting for that moment of dread that never came. It was not campy either, which could have saved it. 

Overall it is a testament to how GREAT Rosemary's baby was. It makes Rosemary's baby seem like the world's most creepiest movie ever. And apartment 7A is like a piece of cheap candy. 

Sigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

One of the most absurd things I've watched in my entire life. Such a fall from grace... in comparison to the first movie. A horrible, unforgettable flop. A confused mess. Lady Gaga acting in CINEMA should be against the law. Like... she literally has to be stopped.  I'm traumatized from how bad this movie was. I really can't believe they thought this should follow the original Joker. Disturbing.

 

@Liberty City

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

P.S People in the cinema were cringing and laughing. This was a complete opposite reaction to what the first movie delivered back in the day. I remember how FREAKED the whole room was at the premiere of the OG movie. 

Disaster. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Oh, I know it was. I was just talking about how it's not giving me parallels to Caroline dying. It's really as far from it as possible.  But about the foreshadowing - Hahahhahah. Yes. And you missed one - Liam googling - "what is cancer"... on google. 
    • GH 2-17-21 Denise Alexander's last appearance https://www.instagram.com/p/DJdjXgwJ1Ez/
    • @Maxim This Liam dying out of the blue was crafted in a hurry for three reasons: 1. To facilitate JMW's leave 2. To prop Steffy - 'Oh, Steffy has so much grace and moral superiority that she ignored everything that swine HoLo did to tell her for the sake of their daughters. Queen Stephanie would be so proud of her!' 3. Distracting Steffy enough to give Lunacy an easy way to slither into Finn's life. Once Luna discovers that Lame is dying, she'll play that card: 'Dad, life is too short and precious!' If this was an intentional story, we would've had the typical B&B foreshadowing - Liam faceplanting into a bowl of pasta, Lame missing meetings, being forgetful. Instead, Lame does an impulsive quick quit and $B doesn't even care enough to make a single attempt to get him back? Please.   
    • https://www.tvinsider.com/1180503/denise-alexander-dead-general-hospital-lesley-webber/ Alexander made her soap opera debut as Lois Adams on The Clear Horizon in 1960, but her big break came in 1966 when she was cast as Susan Hunter Martin on Days of Our Lives while still attending college at UCLA. As Susan, Alexander played a host of dramatic tales, including murdering her husband David Martin (played by Clive Clerk) in May 1967 after the death of their son. “She started out as the bad girl and was thrown out of boarding school for smoking and drinking,” recalled Alexander to We Love Soaps TV. “The character caught on and sparked something with the audience, and that is how Susan became an important part of the show. I was there for almost seven years…. I had such a wonderful time on Days. It was like going to camp every day for me. I loved the people, loved the show, and loved what I got to do. They loved the character and liked me as an actor and gave me lots of neat stuff to do. I didn’t even ask for a vacation for five years because if I worked 365 days a year, I thought I was great. It was a very good time in my life.” In 1973, Alexander was in contract negotiations with Days when ABC offered significant perks to the actress to join General Hospital to play Dr. Lesley Williams. Though Alexander loved her time in Salem, she decided to leave. “It was [Days’ Executive Producer] Betty Corday who sent me to General Hospital,” Alexander told welovesoaps.net. “She said, ‘You must do this.’ So when I went to General Hospital..."

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Now that GL and LOL synopses are being added I'd welcome requests for specific soaps from 1976.
    • By 78 NBC daytime was struggling. They knew what the issues were but failed to make the changes needed to get those young gals watching.  Jan 78 Plans for NBC's daytime programs - which are in third place -are apparently less well defined at the moment. Michael Brockman, a former daytime programer at ABC, took the position of vice president in charge of daytime for NBC just a few weeks ago. He and his chief assistant, Mary Alice Dwyer (an associate of Mr. Brockman at ABC), are in the process of analyzing the network's schedule to determine where to begin making changes. One thing Mr. Brockman knows, he said, is that NBC needs more women18 -49 (NBC is currently last in that category in daytime). "Whatever you design," he said, "has to fundamentally appeal to that demographic." He indicated, however, that he is less concerned with the network's afternoon serial block than he is with its morning game show and rerun mix, and, like his counterparts at the other networks, Mr. Brockman discounts the notion that recent drops in daytime viewership may be attributable to the one -hour serial form. The first changes were indeed in the morning. In April 78 Card Sharks replaced Sanford and Son reruns at 10am and High Rollers was introduced at 11am knocking Wheel of Fortune back to 11.30 replacing Knockout. Sanford and Son moved to noon replacing To Say the Least. On paper that looked like a stronger schedule. The next move in July was the disastrous America Alive at noon, replacing Sanford and The Gong Show,which set them back even further. Finally in October 78, Jeopardy was brought back at 10.30 and Hollywood Squares moved to 1pm replacing another flop For Richer for Poorer. The only major change for the soaps apart from cancelling FRFP, was Linda Grover as headwriter for The Doctors as of April 78.
    • Yeah, Ben and Evie don't start interacting in a 'we're going to pair them together as a couple' way until Feb/March 1977 when she recommends Ben paint a portrait for Jackie.  And Evie's working for Jackie so she and Ben interact and start to become friends.  That happens after Tim breaks up with  her and she's forgiven her sister.. and he and Hope break up after he covers for his younger brother for a crime that he had committed.  Jackie does come onto the canvas in December 1976 and the first months are her trying to snag Mike while she and Justin seem to play a cat and mouse game with one another as he's trying to restart things with Sara again. I often wonder if the Phillip story only came about because the show was going to be expanded to an hour.. and the Dobson's deciding that some of the new characters they were introducing could be tied to Justin/Jackie's back story.
    • Seems like the Dobsons were aiming for a Joe/Sara/Justin triangle or, having decided that Joe would be killed off, Justin would be waiting in the wings. But that never came to pass and I don't think there was much reference to Justin/Sara as time went on.That was something that could have been used later on but Doug Marland may not have known or cared. Also, when the show went to an hour they could add a lot of characters and not rely on the stalwarts, hence Jackie/Alan/Elizabeth. And after Leslie died, Mike went into Dad mode with Hope. Hope/Ben never took off and Hope was replaced and then dropped and Ben moved on to Eve, whose romance with Tim fizzled and Jordan Clarke left (by choice?)
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Would anyone have any of these Y&R episodes they could add to the vault? It would be very much appreciated. November 11, 1987 February 16, 1989 February 17, 1989 February 1991 episode - Brad vs Paul fight April 10, 1992 November 16, 1992 November 17, 1992 November 23-27, 1992 July 11, 1993 October 5, 1993 June 17, 1994  - english version June 29, 1994 September 15, 1994 May 16, 1995 August 4, 1995 October 27, 1995 March 11, 1996 April 8, 1996 September 6, 1996 November 26, 1996 January 3, 1997 January 27, 1997 February 17, 1997 February 18, 1997 March 5, 1997 April 22, 1997 June 16, 1997 September 23, 1997 September 24, 1997 September 25, 1997 December 11, 1998 January 12, 2000 September 27, 2000 March 5, 2001 March 6, 2001 March 8, 2001 - english version March 19, 2001 April 5, 2001 April 6, 2001 October 7, 2002 January 30, 2004 August 23, 2004 August 24, 2004 June 15, 2004 June 21, 2004 November 8, 2004                                          
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy