Jump to content

Halt & Catch Fire


ThePrinceOfSunspear

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Was just curious if anyone else was watching this on AMC?

I actually wasn't even aware of this part of history as it relates to the computer revolution. So I find the concept and the setting of Texas to be quite fascinating.

Lee Pace is quite simply an amazing actor and each of the three main characters are very interesting. The dynamic between each pair is just incredible. The young genius versus the experienced older guy. The genius and the visionary. The visionary and the guy who feels like he's settled for less than he deserves.

I really hope it does well ratings wise...reviews seem very positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I am watching and I was living in Dallas and working for Frito-Lay in the aftermath. So. Feel really familiar. I think the history is fascinating, but the characters are kind of wonky. Very "Wolf of Wall Street" meets "Big Bang" EDS and TI.

I love Cameron. She's always the smartest "guy" in the room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Variety names Chris Rodgers and Chris Cantwell (co-writers of Halt and Catch Fire) as writers to watch in 2014.

http://variety.com/gallery/varietys-10-tv-scribes-to-watch-2/?utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breakingnewsalert#!3/chris-cantwell-and-chris-rogers/

Focusing on the quiet revolutions of an industry whose importance would only become fully apparent later, as well as office gender politics and what Rogers calls “the degree to which people who create things put their problems into that product,” the two were well aware that “Halt” would catch comparisons to their home net's “Mad Men,” but resolved to isolate themselves from the noise.

“You can never follow a show like 'Mad Men,' or a show like 'Breaking Bad,' those are shows that are in the vanguard,” Cantwell says. “We really worked to differentiate ourselves, and I think people will feel a different energy from the pilot onward.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hey! Yeah I love the historical atmosphere of it and while I technology I'm not software engineer and I don't understand code at all so I find the dialogue and the struggle for what they want to achieve very interesting to watch.

Cameron is definitely interesting however I think Lee Pace is absolute magnetic in his role. Every time he's on screen I'm just glued to what ever he's saying and the interactions he has with the other characters.

That ending scene between the three of them was just fantastic. And correct me if I'm wrong but it seemed like Cameron confronted him about it all being made up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No. You are right, she did. It's one of the things I love about her. He's basically all about sales and strategy and creating illusion and She really sees right through him. Knows what he's going to do before he does at times. I loved how Cameron said they were going to fire her as soon as they had her code, and when whatshisface admitted it, she was like "Really?!!". LOL. She knew it. But she just couldn't believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I got really confused when Cameron was at Roger and Donna's house (I think?). What was the guy that Roger fired doing there? I must have dozed off or something, because I couldn't figure out what was going on. Loved how Donna handled Cameron. And that she figured out exactly what Joe had done, and told her husband.

Those scenes with the "investor's" husband last week were just nuts. It was also weird because the guy who played the husband, played a gay quarterback on Unnecessary Roughness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • GH on Hulu, their Top 15 list, now for the second consecutive day ... #1.
    • From PKWaddle, ex-soap journo & fan & one known only to give good intel, in a post on my FB soap group: #1 Peacock shows 10 of the past 12 weeks DAYS in their TOP 3. #2 DAYS is now more ahead, currently at 10 months & 1 week.
    • Just a little nod, Today would've been Bill Hayes 100th Birthday! He was almost the first Centenarian On A Soap
    • Kevin Kline's description of soap fans makes me laugh.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not to ramble too far off topic but it happens a lot with comics too, especially only wanting to keep cheap talent around and pushing out creative voices. There are some patches where creatives can go to start their own worlds...wish that was true with soaps, but who knows, maybe it can happen someday. I never thought we'd get a new soap this year.
    • Very true & also at least in the case of stand-out HWs, it is fraught with exhaustion & burnout.
    • Plus we are never going to have a Shonda Rhimes, a Dick Wolf, or a Chuck Lorre of daytime -- a single brilliant person who could come in and change the genre -- because Shonda, Dick, or Chuck would only be able to work on one soap opera at a time, not three or four at the same time as they do in primetime.  As long as TPTB insist on the 60-minute format, we will never have another super influential individual like Phillips, Nixon, or Bell.  They simply would never have time to do more than one soap opera at a time and that would stifle their influence overall. Thanks. So maybe this is happening to some degree in other entertainment genres.  I don't keep up with the particular franchises you mentioned, so I was unaware.  I appreciate your perspective.
    • I think it's become more common in other genres in recent decades, as the industry as a whole has collapsed - these are complaints that have been made about creative talents in the MCU, Star Wars, Doctor Who, etc.  The MCU is in that place now as they burnt so much goodwill that even when their new movie got strong reviews, the audience didn't show up - similar to how AW got some praise for their 89-93 material compared to some of the barren years beforehand, but viewers just weren't coming back.  (I know they did return, somewhat, in the JFP run, but not enough to make up for the big budget she used)
    • I mean I really hope so. Still kinda amazed though that it would get by Standards & Practices. A pair that was talked about that I could see it was Jacob Young & that guy who kept changing what name he went by Someone Martines at least part of the time, but at any rate Jacob was playing Lucky & this other guy was playing Nikolas.
    • Excellent explication. That doing it in these two examples, is not like doing it in other similar genres or franchises, so one could easily postulate that the people who hire do not generally consider "newbies" but instead insist upon experienced people, which leads to rehiring rather than hiring from "outside" which is what your closed system is all about.  When you think about it how many people can you name who did soaps who came from outside? I can only think of 3 HWs : Pete Lemay, Hogan Sheffer & Michael Malone. For EPs only 2: Wendy Riche & Linda Gottlieb    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy