Jump to content

Soap operas prompt Indian divorce


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Soap operas prompt India divorce

_46743644_arguing226.jpg The couple had daily fights, the court heard An Indian woman was granted a divorce on the grounds that her husband was cruel to stop her watching soap operas.

The judge ruled that "not allowing the spouse to watch TV serials amounted to cruelty" and was grounds for divorce. The husband has lodged an appeal.

The couple had been married for eight years and have a daughter. They began fighting in 2005, the court heard.

Among other complaints, the woman said her husband had insulted her, refused to have sex with her and spat at her.

The couple's divorce came through in August, but details only emerged when the husband's appeal was heard in the Mumbai (Bombay) High Court on Monday.

'Flimsy'

The original family court order was issued in the western city of Pune.

"From February 2005, the husband started picking up quarrels with the wife almost every day on the ground that she was seeing Hindi serials on TV channels," Judge MG Kulkarni said.

"The husband was not allowing the wife to see programmes on TV as per her choice."

The woman, an accountant, was granted custody of the couple's six-year-old daughter. Her husband, a software engineer, was granted access of two hours a week.

The husband's legal team argued there was no evidence for his wife's allegations.

His lawyer, Amit Karkhane, told the BBC the family court order was "preposterous".

"It's given on very flimsy grounds," he said. "Such an order is detrimental to society. It's not good for the larger interest of society."

On Monday, two high court judges in Mumbai told the couple to seek conciliation. The judges said an agreement to divorce by mutual consent would be in the best interests of everyone, including their daughter.

The next hearing is due on 23 November, the Daily News and Analysis newspaper said.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8363859.stm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The most we ever saw was on the "Roger years" tape.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy