Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted (edited)

She gave those remarks directly to Logan. "But Dwyer-Dobbin says, "Roger is a powerful, active, sexual, multicolored villain. That's who we need him to be on the GL canvas. We do not need a wizened little old man. And that's what he would have to play in his condition. It really hurts me to have to say that, but all I can do is wish Michael all the best. My heart truly goes out to him."

Edited by chrisml
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

If I remember correctly, an article that appeared in early 1997 hinted that the show was planning a major Roger/Holly storyline. It was right around the time that several GL actors, including Michael Zaslow and Maureen Garrett, reenacted a radio episode as part of the show's 60th anniversary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, I stand corrected. She said it before, also, when no press was present. Of course, we are amazed at her arrogance in going out of her way to repeat it to Michael Logan. To me the most important thing is that she did not get away with saying it!!! She seems to have been enamored of her words. What a crock. This is her legacy. She wiped away her whole life's accomplishments. She will always be remembered for saying this truly evil statement. But, she thinks she's right! 

I thought the recast was just another slap in Zas's face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If she had said this in 2024... I can't even imagine the reaction... with the way social media and the world works these days... She would have probably needed to record 10 different apology videos. And still... not enough. TOO VILE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She wasn't the last soap person to feel so confident in Logan's hands that they said how they really felt. The same happened a few years later with FMB (to be clear FMB did not say anything along these lines - she just panned the state of ABC Daytime).

You could also see that onscreen as suddenly Holly and Roger were getting very clear scenes to rebuild their relationship and humanize Roger somewhat after he had been dragged through the mud under McTavish/Laibson. I remember one in an elevator and another over the phone. By the time Parlato came in that had mostly changed. They were still doing Roger/Holly but even then I think someone must have sensed it wasn't going to be the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Of course, the instant Zas, armed with his diagnosis, approached the show about writing his situation into the show, the writers jumped to immediately begin spitballing what they would write & how they would write it. Obviously they'd put Holly back in Roger's orbit ... but as we know Paul shut them down & even had the nerve to say to them they knew why this was never gonna happen. Funny, because they didn't think that they knew!!! I want to underline this! We can be proud of the writing team. By all accounts, their reaction was immediate, positive, affirming & reaching for a writer's solution as fast as they could brainstorm, completely assuming that this WOULD BE DONE. 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
typos are always with us
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Contessa, it's no big deal you misremembered the context of MADD's comment. We've all done it in other circumstances.

It's odd to me that Claire Labine initially was going to bring Zaslow to OLTL but then that fell through for mysterious reasons (Logan hints his agents nixed the 3 day deal). Shortly after, Labine went to GL knowing full what kind of people worked there on the show and at the network. She can't claim ignorance. She knew what she was walking into. I never thought about it before, but the timing is suspicious to me. Why of all the headwriters in the soap world would P&G bring over the very headwriter who made them look bad in the press over the Zaslow firing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It appears that she practiced this quote in advance and seems delighted, aroused even, to utter these hateful words. How can you "wish someone the best" while taking away his employment,  dignity, and community of colleagues at the most challenging time of his life. This is her legacy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And Dwyer-Dobbin lasted years in the role after the quote/interview so no one at the network or at P&G had problems with anything she said or anything that was done. The more you think about the situation, the more horrendous it becomes. Even in 2025, their inhumanity is shocking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
    • Josh continues to try and milk Abbott/Newman rivalry. First it was Billy/Victoria, then Kyle/Summer, then Noah/Allie (that worked out well) and now Kyle/Claire. Do we have any inkling when Billy Flynn will arrive and who he will play? I'm sure Cole's illness will mostly play offscreen. What's in store for Nick and Sharon? Is it time to put them back together? I can't see any other romantic options. Nick has no children on the canvas to play off, as Christian is never seen. Sharon has only Mariah onscreen.
    • I would appreciate (if they're not coming), for future scripts to refer to them by their iconic hairdos.  For example, if Hope needs to call Chelsea because Bo has Sepsis, I'd like Shawn-D to say, "My Mom called Chelsea (the one with the sassy short black hair) for an update." Also, new rule, if Melanie does return, she needs to dye her hair back to red.  I googled who she was five times during Victor's funeral.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Broderick, thank you for all of the info [I edited for space]. I am so grateful for everyone filling in the blanks for me. I suspected the Nora/Eliot scene was very important and it was setting something up but I didn't know what. Can't wait to see it play out. The two actors had such a great back and forth. I should have made the Paige/Patty Hearst connection. I thought Paige was in love with Brian from the first episode I watched but it seemed as if they were brother and sister. Steve kept being affectionate with her so I assumed he was the love interest. Then she was affectionate with someone else and well..she's a very busy woman. I can't wait to see Frances Fisher show up. (I'm trying to be vague because I don't know what would be a spoiler in this storyline) Now it makes sense why Draper would be upset. I didn't get the whole background of why he didn't go to NY. I'm a sucker for good acting, so I might still side with April and Margo, if the writers don't give Draper more to do besides yelling.  He had more chemistry with Logan, but I know that's not happening.  Something else I noticed: the show really takes care with even the smallest parts. The acting is superb. Too often, I noticed on older soaps they don't take care with the recurring or day players (Ryan's Hope was so bad with this that I couldn't make it through some episodes). It's only been six episodes, but so far, the casting department was spot on.
    • I thought Dante was overreacting.  Gio made some mistakes but he's young and he tried.  It's not like he dragged two 14 years to a party and made them get blackout drunk.  Dante can have the initial upset reaction, but to go on and on was a bit much.  
    • His (adoptive) nieces.  Chelsea and Stephanie.  I think Abby was involved too, but I am not sure if they are related lol.
    • That was such a dark story. I never liked Swamp girl after that. And then the dating your cousin thing. I think wasn’t Max in a triangle with two of his cousins?
    • Thank you, @j swift.  I'm probably more sympathetic to Draper Scott than most audience members are -- even though I'm absolutely CRAZY about Ann Williams & her bizarre Margo Huntington character 

      Please register in order to view this content

      The more I watch these episodes -- and I've watched several of them a zillion times, I'm ashamed to admit -- you realize there's a WHOLE lot of passive-aggressive hostility brewing inside Margo Huntington about Draper.  She wants to take April AWAY from him and recreate the childhood that she never got to experience with April, because of the adoption 25 years ago.  Draper has sense enough to realize how heartless and vindictive Margo really is about other people's lives and their feelings, but he bites his tongue rather than poison his wife's mind about how horrible her mother really is.  And I admire him for that.  He's a sweet boy.   
    • Unfortunately, as the 90s wore on, Felicia started wearing as many gray and neutral tones as Giorgio Armani and Donna Karan could produce, and the shoulder pads deflated to a drop sleeve.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy