Jump to content

Question about HW


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I was just reading some old articles found on newspapers and something intrigued me. Was Pat Falken Smith temporaily replaced in mid-1980 by Gordon Russell? I did not know about this but the article mentionned something like that. It is about Kin Shriner leaving to "Texas"

"As for the role of Scotty, it's not official as to whether the role will be recast or written out. It's important to note that come Aug. 11 Gordon Russell — former headwrlter for One Life to Live — takes over as head scripter of GH from Pat Falken Smith. Just a month ago, Falken Smith was assured by the powers that be that her job was safe."

Can someone help me clear this out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have read before that Gordon Russell was slated to take over GH,but he was unable to do so due to ill health.

Gordon Russell died of cancer January 1981.

I would propose that his health took a downturn and he not in a position to work at that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks Paul, I was just surprised reading it. Pat Falken Smith must have been hard to work with. Another article mentionned that after Falken Smith left to join DAYS again, there was no head writer for a while (the article mentions that six writers were writing together) before the Corringtons took over. I had always thought that Robert J. Shaw took over after Smith's departure but it seems that the Corringtons head wrote GH before "Capitol" started. I am right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Interesting you should say that.

When Pat Falken Smith joined Days,I read an interview in Afternoon TV(since lost)with Pat,that Gloria Monty was difficult to work with.

I recall the quote along the line that Gloria found fault in every outline and storyline.

I think Doug Marland hinted at similar issues with Ms Monty.

It seems that as Exec Producer,Gloria had a strong vision and wanted writers who would follow that vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's a quote from Marland

“There was going to be a long love story between Luke and Laura before he was going to be killed,"remarks Marland,who hastens to add that"Luke's popularity would have been noted by then and it(the story)would have changed”.

But before he had the opportunity to script Luke and Laura's storyline,he was fired. Although it has been reported that bitter disagreements with Gloria Monty as to how the Scotty/Laura/Luke triangle should progress was the reason behind Marland's dismissal,Douglas denies those allegations. After noting that he wanted Scotty and Laura's marriage to last longer than three weeks and Gloria wanted the marriage gone,”Marland says,”I wasn't fired because of Gloria's storyline demands. She wanted me to move to California and I refused. I had written the show for two and a half successful years from Connecticut so I didn't see why I suddenly needed to be in California."

Although he denies a clash with Monty,the above sentences speak for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was just thinking of Pat's short stint in GL after her second run as HW on DAYS. She left very soon. Gloria Monty tried to replace her with Gordon Russell when she was on GH. I think they had both very strong personalities.

About GH writers I was talking about, it looks like Thom Racina and Leah Laiman wrote GH after Smith left (or was fired: it is very disputed in articles I have read) but Shaw was credited as HW (I don't really know why). The Corringtons took over for a short time then Anne Howard Bailey until 1985. I am in a "listing head writers" mood ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Pat's 2nd stint as HW was short circuited due to her lawsuit that went back to her original stint on DOOL.

I am not denying Pat might have been difficult to work with,but Gloria was not blameless in that regard.

I am a bit of a headwriter junkie also and would like to sort out the dates of GH and others where there is confusion.

Hope others might be able to clear things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy