Jump to content

Madonna to adopt baby from India


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Madonna to adopt baby from India

LONDON: 'Queen of Pop' Madonna is set to adopt a baby from India.

The 49-year-old singer has decided to adopt an Indian toddler after she failed to apparently find a little girl from Africa due to red tape, according to a report published in the 'The Sun' today.

Madonna is said to have fallen in love with India after she visited that country with her 39-year-old husband Guy Ritchie and kids -- Lourdes, 11, Rocco, seven, and adopted Malawian son David, two -- in January.

The 'Material Girl' would soon fly out to choose a baby after she finishes promoting her new album Hard Candy, sources said, adding that Ritchie had also agreed to the plan though he was initially opposed to it.

When in India, the couple met Bollywood choreographer Sandip Soparrkar -- who has adopted an Indian baby.

"We spoke about how there are so many children in India who need homes," Soparrkar told the British tabloid, claiming he's convinced that Madonna would definitely adopt one from that country.

Added the unnamed source: "Madonna was very taken with Sandip. He told her there were orphans who would melt her heart. Guy was against the idea, but when she wants something, she gets it.

"The two-year bid to adopt David was said to be very stressful. Guy thought Madonna was mad to want to go through it all again. He has always been unsure about adoption as his own mother was adopted and had negative experiences of that.

"But they talked and talked and decided adopting a baby from India would be easier."


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ET_Cetera/Madonna_to_adopt_baby_from_India/articleshow/2932747.cms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

But take a good look at this unbelievable sentence, especially this part:

As if babies were, I don't know, shoes? Just like that you can pick whichever you like and take it away with you...

This is just insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Regardless, the baby will be living in a good home unlike many unfortunate children who don't have the comforts and necessities that they should. This baby will be very blessed with his/her other siblings growing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy