Jump to content

Marlena De Lacroix says 'Multiple Suspect Murder Mysteries are So-o-o Done!'


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I actually completely disagree on this one. Sure, it's often done badly. But what story line on soaps isn't?

I will agree that the TMK on General Hospital has been a disater, but I blame that more on atrocious writing than anything else. It never made sense. Of all of the characters on the show, they picked two popular young women who literally NO ONE had any motive in killing.

Contrarily, I really enjoyed the B&B story. I thought that it was an excellent example of a who dunnit. There were many characters with convincing motives, and real moral questions involved. And it is still providing residual drama. I thought that story was very well carried out.

So I still think that a well-executed murder mystery can be fantastic. And I will take that soap convention any day over watching yet another "who's the daddy?" or serial rapist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

This made me LMAO!!

Marlena is right though. These murder mysteries with mulptile suspects the past couple of years has been awful. I think the reason why the TMK has no urgency or narrative is because TPTB didn't know who the killer was at the beginning of the story. Now they've thrown this mysterious guy who works at Kelly's?

ITA, B&B ended this too quickly.

The last best serial killer storyline was of course the Salem Serial Killer - it didn't have multiple suspects (at least I don't remember it did LOL). :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy