Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

His position on business specifically is that he will provide tax relief (eliminate all captial gains) to small business and start-ups that create jobs. And a $500 tax credit "Making Work Pay" for small business owners. This is clearly stated on BarackObama.com

There are a couple of policies that are very intriguing:

What do you think of these policies? Do you feel that companies doing alot of offshore hiring should not be penalized in any way? Especially when they are getting huge tax breaks in this country?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Immigration is probably one of the most complex ethical issues out there right now. You know, my instinct just wants to say ship them out and be done but there's so much more involved. The labor force they provide is a needed commodity but then the reason they are so needed is because businesses avert the system to hire them and therefore aren't obligated to give them the minimum wage or any other employment benefit. I don't know how exactly I feel. I think immigrants get screwed because they have no employment protection but at the same time they can receive social program benefits even though there is no revenue from them to pay for it. Employers are fleecing the system. The workers are fleecing the system and consumers reap the benefits of it.

I guess bottom line is that I do not think criminal acts should be rewarded and illegal immigration is by definition a criminal act. Solving that is a whole other ball game. I can't criticize candidates for mixed messages here because I'm in the same boat with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Roman - I think the beef with him is that he's endorsed Democrats before, mostly because of social issues. He is pretty much right in line with the Republicans on other matters - fiscal, military, welfare. But he argues that the Republican party has shifted too much focus to social matters like gay marriage and abortion.

If someone feels differently, please jump in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I've seen and heard the statements about the capital gains tax. It is very misleading in that small business do not usually pay capital gains taxes. They do however, pay income and payroll taxes, which Obama will increase on those that bring in $250,000 or more, which many of them do.

That's exactly where I feel the double talk stands (the $500 tax credit/ per worker). How will that even make sense when he is going to raise income and corporate tax on business?

Personally, I dont feel that any American business should be punished. The intent of the tax breaks is to bring them back. Obama's plan (to raise their taxes) IMO will drive them further out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Crap. Now I have to go and look up the website where I saw these figures. Crap crap crap. Please excuse me because I'm going on memory here and I may have some of my information a little bit off. I have a brain like a steel sieve sometimes. UGH!

From one website the name of which I cannot remember it says that an analysis of McCain's voting record shows that the notorious 90% is a little bit misleading. If unanimous senate votes are discarded (which means items where not only McCain voted "with Bush" so did Biden, Clinton, Obama and everyone else in the Chamber) there is a 45% agreement rate. McCain and Bush disagree on immigration, campaign reform, judge appointments, budgetary items, and there were some other ones that are just not popping in my mind right now.

Aging is a horrible thing. I'll try to think of it to get the actual truth over here and you don't have to go on my word and piss-poor memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is how I feel. Obama has said that he will reward tax breaks to companies that either stay in the States or return to the States. The only businesses, from his word, that he said would get taxed are those that shut down and leave the U.S.

If that is the case, and your business outsourced your job.......why do they deserve a tax break?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great article on Obama's tax plan

"The big trick behind the Obama tax plan is that his refundable tax credits would primarily go precisely to those who pay little or nothing in federal income taxes. The latest CBO data shows the bottom 40% of income earners already pay no federal income taxes. Indeed, they receive a net payment from the federal income tax system, meaning from the taxpayers, equal to 3.8% of all federal income taxes, because of the refundable tax credits under current law. The middle 20% of income earners, the true middle class, pays 4.4% of federal income taxes. Overall, the bottom 60% of income earners pay less than 1% of federal income taxes on net."

"REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES should be trumpeting the fact that the results of Reaganomics over the past 30 years has been to abolish federal income taxes on the poor and the working class, and almost abolish them on the middle class. They should be emphasizing as well that another result of those tax policies is that the top 1% of income earners now pay 40% of all federal income taxes, and the top 10% now pay 71%, contrary to the foolish political propaganda of the neo-socialist class warriors. When Obama spouts that the rich need to pay their fair share, he should be asked what the heck is their fair share? 100%? 150%?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh. Ok. :)

It's just that if this is true, it will give me pause and I'll have to change my thinking on it.

But thanks for looking this up in the first place. :)

BTW, what is McCain's stance on taxing small businesses and corporations? Will he give tax breaks to all, even if they shut down and ship jobs overseas or out of the country, or will he tax certain bussinesses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy