Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

:D Wales... Actually, the truth is that I wasn't going to vote at all. As recently as probably three weeks ago, I had no intention of voting because I have been quite disgusted the past few years with politics, the state of things, etc. As I watched the Democratic Primary, I was a little uncomfortable with how Hillary was treated by the press and her own party. On the other side, it was clear McCain would be the Republican's guy and he certainly wasn't someone I would choose. As for Obama... I didn't know a damn thing about him or where the hell he came from -- same issue as so many have of Palin today. We forget that Obama came out of nowhere, too, but somehow his rise to national prominence the past year is more palatable to some. I frankly don't get it.

I personally think both parties have failed us big time and we desparately need an alternative. More and more, the Republicans and Democrats seem so disconnected with the mainstream and it has become more important to stay in power than properly run the country.

I have distinct opinions of each candidate running... some of my thoughts may surprise you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't like hate-filled posts either, but I thought were probably going to support McCain/Palin regardless. :lol: :lol: I edited this after reading your previous post. Sorry.

On a related note (but not related to the quoted post here), I did think that Palin's speech was pretty hateful.

Hmmm, maybe Democrats ought to resurrect some GOP quotes after Ann Richards' convention speech and throw them back out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Hillary was treated well at the convention. You know, I think she and Bill were given their full due and they were entitled to that.

I have to agree with you to a very large degree about both parties letting us down. The Republicans are more concerned with moral issues -- to the point of snobbery in my opinion -- and the Democrats run from what we are. We are liberal. I like Republicans better when they were only partrician. Now they are so holier than tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not that I think you should have to say but just because I'm guessing, is it safe to say that you don't like Obama? You say that you don't know anything about him or where he came from but you seem to imply that you know about Palin and it's people other than you that don't know who she is.

I heard of Obama in 2004 because of the rave reviews he received over a speech he gave at the Democratic National Cionvention. I was prompted to read the speech to see whether I agreed and I listened to it and thought he was an impressive speaker. I read his bio and I subsequently heard various political pundits tossing his name around as a potential presidential candidate.

He was tagged as up and coming in 2004. The shocker probably was that no one expected him to actually run this soon. Hillary Clinton was supposed to have the nomination wrapped up before the process even began so it was like being ahead in a race when a runner seemingly appears out of nowhere to beat you.

Had Palin's name been tossed about by pundits back then, I would have already heard of her as well.

At this point I find it odd that you could say you don't know anything about Obama or Palin if you were implying that. I get if you don't like what you've seen but I don't get saying you don't know a thing about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reference was made to her treatment during the primaries not the convention if that helps and IA that the GOP was better when they were only partisan. I don't think politics and religion should be mixed. It's fine if a politician is religious since that's quite personal but I don't think a political party should be used to push religious platforms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I paid absolutely no attention to the primaries back in 2004, so I was not aware of Barack then. The first I had actually heard of him was last year when he appeared on the scene, first challenging Hillary for the nomination. Palin? Last week was the first I had heard of her. I have been sort of disconnected from politics the past few years, quite unhappy with the state of things. I still maintain that the choices we are now presented with -- these two tickets -- are woefully lacking. For each of us to vote partyline is fine... but do any of us REALLY think these candidates are the best the respective parties could do??

Personally, I think the election will be all about ideology. If your beliefs lean left, you'll vote for Obama regardless of any other factors out there. If you lean right, you'll vote for McCain. I have no doubt that all four candidates are nice people and well-intentioned. I hate how each side demonizes the other... it is so pointless. I guess it makes it easier when you can develop a hate for the opponent... makes all the character assasination and lies tolerable, I suppose, and gives the media plenty of good stuff to tirelessly perpetuate. I think if it wasn't for our irresponsible, sensationalistic media in search of ratings, we might actually have a decent race about ideas and policy positions.

I believe either John McCain or Joe Biden could effectively serve as President. I don't believe Barack Obama or Sarah Palin are qualified to be our country's chief executive -- however, I am comfortable with either one of them serving as Vice President. And, yes, I realize I have flipped the Democratic ticket. I did that on purpose. LOL. With regard to the Democratic ticket... I believe Hillary Clinton would have had the best chance to win the Presidency and I am certain she was the better-qualified candidate in the Democratic primary.

Plus, it would have been a really weird thing in the history books to see the line of Presidents listed as Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton. LOL!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know during the primary both Hillary and Obama attracted a lot of people who were new to politics. I think they were true believers and took things a little personally. I know I was really mad when she went on Fox. I think Bill Clinton was pretty mad about being thought of as racist. He's not. I think Hilary was upset that everyone thought she should just get out of the race. I don't know that the Clinton and Obamas will ever been best friends, but I hope the convention put some of the rancor behind the party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Everybody can talk about qualifications for being president, but nobody can say what they are. Nobody is "qualified" to be president. It's a bigger job than one person. It was not designed to be what it is now.

All I can hope for is they make decisions in the best interest of the country, hire good people and seek good advice. Also, I think right now they should be able to build credibility with foreign countries. I also think they should be able to lead and to inspire citizens to be a little better than we naturally are. I expect a president to lead. I think Obama can do that, and do it better than McCain. I don't like McCain's saber rattling. We've had enough of that with Bush.

I do agree strongly with Wost on one point. I really do not think politicians do us any service with the nasty way they conduct campaigns. I don't like these speeches where they just make [!@#$%^&*] up and say it.

I admit, I worry about McCain's temper. I just really did not like Palin. I just don't like her. You know, I would not vote for a Republican if I personally loved him though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't like the character assasinations either but the interesting thing about how it's viewed to me is that Obama is always guilty of it whether he participates in it or not. I've mainly seen him go after McCain on specific issues and I've mainly seen McCain go after him in a personal way. I think that Obama has been pretty respectful but he's going to be blamed whether he is or not and he's used to that sort of thing.

I generally think the candidates are never the best their parties have to offer. Part of that stems from none of them ever lining up with all the things I want so that's on me to some degree.

I think a portion of voters look at issues that affect them and vote accordingly except for those who have pledged eternal allegiance to a party and vote party lines no matter what This election will be influenced by some other factors as well.

The qualifications for president are minimal. Leadership skills are important and communication skills as well. It's not so much to me whether a person is qualified but whether I see the person as a leader. I think a leader of this country needs to be able to deal with the diversity of the people in this country as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I pretty much agree with all you've said. If you lived here you might have been swayed into voting for Arnold. I've voted for Democrats and Republicans so it's not an issue for me. There are some seemingly decent members of both parties that don't go overboard on the rhetoric and sincerely attempt to accomplish things.

Even though I skipped the convention viewing I am glad it's over. I probably should skip the political shows and spare myself the constant repetition of what does Obama need to do now blah blah. There are only a handful of those pundits that are not completely annoying. And I'll say again that MSNBC should have pulled David Gregory's show instead of Dan Abrams. The only thing I like about his show is the intro.

I saw a clip of Keith Olbermann and he seemed really disturbed by the 9/11 clip that was shown at the GOP convention which reminds me of what I find the most distasteful about the Republican party right now: their constant fear mongering. People are supposed to be afraid of war, afraid of every country except the ones that Republicans say are okay, afraid of Obama because he was born in the exotic state of Hawaii, because of his middle name and it goes on and on. Hope is a joke and fear is not.

What is the guide they follow for the religion they push because if it's the Bible then they must've skipped the Biblical passage about Faith, Hope. and Charity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do not think that Obama has ever launched a personal attack. He has never spoken ill of Palin. I think the Democratic convention was overall very positive. Obama has said how he differs on issues with McCain. That to me is fair game.

I agree totally. You are right, I would have voted for Arnold. I actually think he has been a good governor. He seems very effective from what I read in the paper. What really bothered me about both McCain and Palin is they lied. I also look forward to Obama discussing the fact that McCain will tax people's insurance benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Arguably DAYS OF OUR LIVES has been brilliant lately & definitely was last week. But, here I am with nitpick & technicalities. This was the only misstep but it was just a stupid thing that should have been caught. Deidre Hall as Marlena has this one problematic line, "It didn't matter how many identities you had, I always knew exactly who you were, you were the man who saved my life." - Marlena, DAYS, 6-2-25 Unfortunately the flashback closest to it was when Marlena was on the phone, terrified because she thought he was Stefano. Yes, it's true that the line is not accurate. There were many times when she did not feel the way she is claiming because of whatever was going on in story with his 'retconned to hell & back' identity & origin story. Does it keep the whole week from being called excellent? Nope.  
    • The Vault has been down all night.
    • Notable: Glendale is not exactly a progressive enclave.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Newsom is a craven opportunist, but his comments today were exactly how better people need to handle Trump.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I decided this primetime soap deserved it's own thread as the Primetime soaps thread is very cluttered and why shouldn't NBC's Lorimar soap mot have a chance to shine? In doing a deeper dive into the second season ratings I was surprised to see that FR actually had an uptick in the ratings when NBC moved it to 9pm Tuesdays beginning March 82. I'd always assumed this move was a desperate one as NBC were running short of programming and had given up on the show,deciding to let the final episodes play out and be hammered by 3's Company  and CBS Movie. But the numbers paint a different story. In it's 10pm slot up against Hart to Hart, which regularly finished in the Top 20, FL premiered in 53rd place and placed in the 40's and 50's as the season continued. But come January 82 the numbers surged a little now moving into the 40's hitting #43 in Feb. Hart to Hart was #11 Then in March Bret Maverick was moved to 8pm with FR @9. First week 16th March FR #47 15.1/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Not great but #2 in it's timeslot March 23 FR #44 15.6/25 3's Company #4 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #33 So even with a stronger movie on CBS FR's numbers went up. March 30 FR #31 16.6/26 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #56 Best rating/position yet Tues April 6 pre empted Tues April 14 FR #36 16.0/26 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #11 CBS Movie #59 Maintaining previous week's numbers Tues April 21 FR #33 15.6/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Numbers down a little (reflecting general spring downturn) but best ranking of the season so far Tues April 28 FR #35 15.1/23 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #6 CBS Movie #42 Tues May 4 FR #27 15.2/24 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #4 CBS Movie #41 Season finale and highest position of the season. Looking at those numbers I wonder why NBC cancelled the show? They had very few hits and here was a show that was holding it's own and moving up in the rankings in a tougher timeslot. And being a serial, the storylines could continue to build the following season. And I'm sure the desirable W18-49 demo was good. Some might argue that CBS were shower weaker movies, but even so, soap viewers are pretty loyal. I guess Grant Tinker arrived at NBC and wanted a classier look but there was room for FR on the schedule. I mean, the following season Knight Rider,Powers of Matthew Star and the A Team arrived so there was still room for more populist fare. Flamingo could have stayed at 9pm-the replacement Gavilan bombed (surely FR would have done better} or moved back to 10pm. The following Jan NBC had a hit with A Team Tues 8pm. Had Flamingo followed it, it might have really taken off. As it was they tried Bare Essence, which flopped. Oh well,it was not to be...    
    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hope you will enjoy the 1976 storyline from the Daytime serial Newsletter. The show had just expanded to an hour so new characters and stories were required. The Soderbergs had been writing since late 73 and the show was still #1. Looking foward to comments and discusssion Pt.1  For over two decades As the World Turns has depicted the events in the lives of two Oakdale families: the wealthy and influential Lowells and the less affluent but equally respected Hughes family. Judge Lowell’s granddaughter Ellen is married now to Dr. David Stewart, whose adopted son, Dan, is actually her own illegitimate child. Dan was once married to Dr. Susan Stewart, by whom he has a daughter, Emily. Dan then married Liz, the ex-wife of his late brother Paul. Liz was the mother of Dan’s daughter Betsy, who believes to this day that Paul was her father. Liz died tragically the day after their wedding. Ellen and David have two daughters, Carolann (Annie) and Dawn (Dee), now of college age. Dan has recently fallen in love with Kim Dixon, who was about to divorce Dr. John Dixon until injuries suffered in a tornado caused amnesia and left her with no memory of her love for Dan. John is using this respite to solicitously convince Kim of his love for her. Nancy and Chris Hughes had three children: Bob, a doctor, Donald, an attorney, and Penny, who, after tragically losing two husbands due to automobile accidents, is now living in Europe, where she is married to a racing-car driver. Bob was married while very young to Lisa Miller, then a scheming and selfish young woman, whose machinations destroyed their marriage. She is the mother of Bob’s son, Tom, who is divorced from Carol, who is now married to Jay Stallings. Tom is currently married to Natalie Bannon. Bob later married model Sandy Wilson, a marriage which ended in divorce, and Sandy is now married to Norman Garrison, who is her partner in a beauty products concern. Norman blames Bob for Sandy’s  recent disillusionment with their marriage, and, ironically, Norman suffered a heart attack during his verbal assault on Bob at a Hughes family party; and while Bob rode with him in the ambulance to the hospital, Bob’s beloved wife, Jennifer, Kim’s sister, died in a car crash while driving home alone. Lisa, more mature and considerate of others now, is married to attorney Grant Colman, but her life has been complicated by the recent arrival in town of Grant’s ex-wife, Joyce, and the incredible news that she and Grant had a child after their separation, a child Joyce gave out for adoption but now wants to reclaim. Now the story continues... The picture has now come clear for attorney Grant Coiman. He has learned that his ex-wife Joyce neglected to tell him she had a child shortly after their divorce and had given the boy to Mary and Brian Ellison for adoption. Grant, after seeing the adoption papers and considering the boy’s interests, tells Mary he feels the child should remain with them; they are providing a fine, stable home for him. Grant’s wife, Lisa, is pleased with his decision, feeling he has thus closed the door to the past and they can now go on with their own lives. But Joyce has learned that attorney Dick Martin is now back in private practice, and she tells him she was confused when she gave Teddy up years ago and wants him to represent her in a custody action to get her son back. Dick tells Joyce she has a very weak case but he’ll do what he can. He goes out to Laramie to see the  Ellisons, upsetting them very much. Grant, meanwhile, has confided in Chris Hughes, his law partner, that while his name was on the consent form for the Ellisons’ adoption, he didn’t sign the papers; he had, in fact, never known that he had a son. But he’s afraid to open a new can of worms by signing a consent form now, as that would reveal that the adoption papers are not legally correct. Grant confides the situation to Lisa, explaining that if he wanted to,  he could probably get custody of Teddy himself, but that’s not what he feels would be best for the child. Mary Ellison finally breaks under the strain of Dick’s visit and tells Brian that Dr. Paulk, the doctor who arranged the adoption, told her he didn’t know where to find the baby’s father and so he signed the consent form himself. She painfully explains she kept this secret knowing that Brian wouldn’t go through with the adoption if he learned the papers weren’t legally sound. Brian quickly calls their family lawyer, Jerry Butler, who immediately phones Grant to be sure he backs the Ellisons’ claim. Dick realizes from Joyce’s story that Grant couldn’t have signed the papers and tells him he knows. The only person who has a right to file for Teddy’s custody now is Grant; he’s the only injured party. And the moment he files, Dick can sue for invalidation of the Ellisons’ adoption. Grant finally files, to settle the custody question once and for all, but technically he's filing for custody himself. Tom Hughes and Natalie Porter are married in a small, lovely ceremony at the home of his grandparents, Nancy and Chris Hughes. They honeymoon in the Southwest and return full of expectations of happiness. Natalie is disquieted, however, when flowers arrive which are not from her new husband. She covers by pretending to check with the florist and tells Tom it was a wrong delivery and they have told her she might as well keep them. But she knows who sent them. Natalie is upset when, shortly after, Luke Porter arrives in town and seeks her out. But Luke insists he is there only to assure her this is a final farewell and he has now decided to concentrate on. making his own marriage work. Sandy Garrison, Bob’s ex-wife, is working at the  bookstore to fill in for Natalie. Her estranged husband, Norman, recovering from a heart attack he suffered during a drunken confrontation with Bob at the Colonnade Room, is still telling anyone who will listen that Bob and Sandy are having an affair, but ironically will let only Bob care for him at the hospital. His recovery is hampered by his easily aroused temper. Norman anxiously tries to persuade Dr. John Dixon to convince Bob to swear he slipped at the restaurant, thus making them liable for a costly lawsuit, but John won’t do this. Chris discovers a large amount of money missing when checking the books on the Garrisons’ business, but doesn’t want to upset Sandy with this. More to come...
    • The cynical (i.e., the dominant) me has the very same thoughts.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy