Jump to content

2008: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Why did you become anti-Trent all of a sudden, Sylph? You used to be one of his biggest fans...

I'm a Trent fan forever. If I were a daytime writer, I'd love to have the career in daytime that he's had. I mean, working with Labine, Long, Curlee, and Bell has to be the dream of a lot of people in the industry. :D

  • Members
Posted

True, I was. Now I'm not. And for a reason.

True. However, it doesn't mean a thing per se. You could have been on staff of all these people and still suck.

  • Members
Posted

^Yes, Sylph, you never give an explanation for why you're not fond of any of these writers. At least with someone like R Sinclair, he gives us paragraphs worth of explantions for why he doesn't like a certain writer, and I love him for it. :lol:

  • Members
Posted

Lame or not, excuses or not... Whatever. You never tell this to Toups, though, when he can't tell you something.

I just cannot tell.

  • Members
Posted

I understand, unlike some, that Toups can only tell us some information and at the appropriate time.

However, I don't see what's wrong for giving a reasoning behind why you aren't fond of certain writers. It's not rocket science to state the flaws in the writing that you see...

  • Members
Posted

QUOTE (Chris B @ Jun 11 2008, 02:14 AM)
From what I've heard Thom Racina is a bad writer, so another strike against Maria Arena Bell in my book. IIRC, he's a sci fi novelist who got his start during the 1980 strike, writing GH with Leah Laiman (another legendary hack). Why won't MAB simply bring back some of the former Bell writers? Where are all these random people coming from? Y&R was supposed to be the best of the best. Now it seems like anyone and their dog walker can be hired on the #1 soap. It's sad.
Maybe none of the former Bell writers want to return to the show. Many were treated abysmally, especially under LML. Maybe they're tired of being "used and abused" and have moved on to other projects where their talents are respected. I say "more power to them." The mess that is Y&R now is of its own making. TPTB fiddled while Genoa City burned. Now they've brought in an inexperienced head writer, even if her last name is Bell, to "save" the show? Could there be a more unrealistic scenario? Plus they're hiring writers who have no history with the show, who don't know the characters or backstories, and they expect to revitalize Y&R? MAB continues to make bad decisions. If she were smart, she'd bring back every writer from the glory days of Y&R, and maybe she's tried but they won't come back. Serves the show right.

  • Members
Posted

Because it's not about the writing. It's personal. At least it was with Janice, if I remember an earlier post correctly. I get it. It sucks for the rest of us, but I get it.

  • Members
Posted

:lol: No, it's not personal!!

It's about the writing. But if you want to live in an illusion thinking how Janice, Trent & Co. are perfect writers, I'm just going to enjoy myself enormously! Just sitting here, watching you live in "the town in the glass bubble, the one God shakes to watch it snow..." :lol::P (Some Shane Black for you, brimike.)

  • Administrator
Posted

I'm sure they would love to come back to rescue the show.

It's like there's a mandate at Y&R to not hire any of the old writers who left. :blink:

You worked with Bill Bell? Oh we're not going to hire you. You were part of the #1 show for decades? Sorry, we don't want that. You lived and breathed Y&R for your entire writing career? Ewwwww.

Yeah, makes a lot of sense.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
    • It’s also strange that it was Monica! I just don’t think of her as the staring off into space type of woman! I watched a bunch of other clips and stuff from random 1978 and 1979 episodes. I’m so used to seeing movement from Monty’s era, especially the early part, that this really is a cool relic. Pretty soon you have scenes start at the new nurses station, the elevators opening and doctors walking to the desk to get their messages from Jessie or Bobbie. People often walk towards doors while taking coats on or off, many Webber house scenes start or end with someone walking up the stairs. This episode is even more static than some of the way earlier ones I have seen, where you would have Steve or Jessie at least going from the old school nurses desk to the medicine room, Steve’s office, etc. That bland dialogue is very much like what they have now. The show picks up a lot of personality. Knowing what we know about David Hamilton and how that really started to get the ball rolling as far as viewers you really see just how vital Lesley and especially Laura were to get things moving for them. They focused on the right characters to get fast results. The show now could learn a thing or two from this.
    • It won't allow me to watch it via the link; I am only able to watch it with the app.
    • Just finished the Goldfinch. Read it in 4-5 days... and it's a huuuuge book. Well... I would rate the first 500 pages a solid 10 out of 10... but then the next 300 were kind of a letdown... so the overall impression is something like - 7/10. It's just very hard to give something a full 10 after reading A little life.  Still... loved it immensely and would probably re-read it in the future. There is a movie adaptation... starring Nicole Kidman... that I haven't seen. 
    • I realize I harp on this, but I think he spending is relevant.  She's not just buying new wigs. She's building a mansion, she's funding a sports complex, she's paying for operations for people she doesn't know, she's caring for Peaches, she's buying apartments. We saw ?her get ONE check for ONE million dollars. That's it. I may be wrong, but I thought they said she'd get a payment every 6 months. Regardless, she could not rule the roost on $1M, and the show is not doing a good job there. Pretending that doesn't matter? I can't do that.  All they had to do was add a couple lines about payouts and payments.  In other news, I would love to know just how much Anita was putting into that trust as well as what investment got her what has to be an incredible return.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy