Jump to content

AMC: Friday


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I can't agree Sin, she has been smug, her telling Zach she would "Get Kendall back, and there is NOTHING he can do about it" is smug

WORD Angela, so much WORD! B)

No it's not, Joe HIMSELF said that Kendall could carry Ian alot longer, that the contractions had stopped, it was finding out Spike was kidnapped that caused her water to break. They showed us that onscreen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Don't agree with me, baby girl. Stand strong and firm in your own opinion. I don't post to get people who don't agree with me to agree with me. I post to help express the point of view of those who do, but don't want to get involved in the bitchfests, don't know exactly how to say what is they want to say or to just simply add balance to a debate. Fundamentally, I can't get behind all of this Crazy Kendall and her Revenge Plot because, one, it makes Kendall look psycho -- not like a mother in crisis, and two, it's overkill -- which seems to be B&E's mantra lately. It's all based on a lie -- not fact. If Kendall was determined to get an honest confession out of SabineLee by setting her up, making her feel like their friendship was on the mend, letting SabineLee's guard down and getting what she needed, then yeah. Go for it. But writing fake letters and planting them on SabineLee's computer is the wrong way to go about it. I can't get behind it. Zach, on the other hand, I don't mind. He's trying to ruin SabineLee from a corporate standpoint. He's doing what Kendall's doing (subterfuge), but no matter what, in the end, it's going to be SabineLee's decision to sell her shares. If getting her eggs back is important enough to her to sell her shares without getting proof they exist, then that's on her. Caveat Emptor. But leading SabineLee to believe you want to be friends, all the while setting her up for something you know she didn't do because you broke into her house, tampered with her computer and are writing these letters yourself is just a little too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sinclair, are you debating - that Zach's plan is more fair (less cruel) to Greenlee or that Zach's plan is less likely to get him in jail quickly? I don't particularly buy either point, but I'd understand the jail point more.

Nothing, absolutely nothing I believe would set Greenlee off against Zach and his family more than the man who killed her embryos using it as leverage against her to take away "her only REAL baby." It would bring the Spike issues back up to the boiling point. On top of that, she could once again try to put him in jail for that crime once his plan came out. Zach should have used a different element to accomplish this goal, do something like have a messanger come in with papers which Greenlee thinks is nothing and have her sign them - no more Fusion (Kendall did that once!). That would have been smarter, but the revenge stories are about Greenlee's redemption on her victims back so it couldn't be that simple. It had to as JR said, "make everybody feel sorry for Greenlee" worthy.

Kendall is framing Greenlee for a crime she did commit but didn't confess to. She just didn't commit the crime this time, but she did kidnap Spike and her making that decision did change this families life forever; she did talk to Spike in the tone of those e-mails before and after that accident - i.e. their special relationship. Kendall is letting Greenlee believe that they could be friends again to set her up for the fall. Yes it would have been smarter for Kendall to just do this friends thing and trick her into confessing on tape, but the revenge stories are about Greenlee's redemption on her victims back so it couldn't be that simple.

I'm not going to oppose either revenge trip just because the writers are taking it "stupid" to redeem the character they took over the line, Greenlee. Greenlee has done nothing in terms of redeeming herself to make me oppose either character trying to accomplish the goals they are. If Greenlee had confessed to Kendall and the cops and offered to leave Fusion and leave Kendall alone out of common decency, that's another story. Right now my only issue with their plans is they're both risking getting their a**es in jail with the fire they're playing with to "get" rid of Greenlee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

at least Babe wasnt let off and had to pay. We didnt see it as it happened off screen, but she got probabtion adn community service not to mention she lost custody of her son, which was the worst punishment for her. Greenlee hasnt lost a lick of anything. I was hoping that Zach would manage to find some way to at least remove her from Fusion. The way the story was presented, she couldnt be brought up on criminal charges, but I think Ryan and Kendall could have attempted to file a civil suit against her

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Community Posts

    • Sharon Case, Eileen Davidson, Amelia Heinle, Elizabeth Hendrickson, Melissa Ordway & Melody Thomas Scott so far seem to have re-shot their opening post-#YR50 cast photo and around the time of the gala filming. And I'm feeling as if it is possible both Lauralee Bell, Courtney Hope & Kate Linder's opening shots might have been a re-shoot, as well. I fully think if they had used the typeface from the 2003 opening it would improve it!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • who is Ex Soap Opera Star?
    • Have the actors portaits in the style of the 70s/early 80s sketch, transform into the cast shots mimicking the 90s style.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Is there a subsection of time where quality (writing, production, acting, etc) slumped during what was otherwise a show's strong period. For example, The Wendy Riche era on GH (1993-2001) was especially strong. However there is a decline in quality after 1996 because of increased mob focus and the eventual departures of Brenda, Robin and Johnathan Jackson's Lucky. Some charachters like Tony, Bobby, and Felicia becan slipping into backburner status toward the end of the era.  Y&R was strong from about 1989-2001. There was however an inbetween period of 1994-97 where there felt like some drops in storytelling and production value. The camera work became more ornate after 1995 but the glamour factor especially in wardrobe was lost after 93. 
    • I will say the first 7 years are gold especially in terms of production value. Much like Y&R there was a slight quality slump between 1994-97. (In fact all CBS soaps minus Guiding Light maybe faced a alump after 93).  Much like Y&R, 1998-2002 was pretty good IMO.  I'd call it Bold's silver era. Brooke/Thorne/Macy, Brooke/Taylor/Ridge,  Brooke/Deacon/Bridget and Sheila's '02 return are some good storylines from that period. From what I've watched on YT, more trashy, cartoonish and camp than the earlier days of B&B but it's silver compared to today's show. I still need to get into the Rick/Amber/Kimberly/Deacon mess to guve it a solid judgement.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy