Jump to content

DAYS: You were raped? Eh, who cares?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Today's show was ample evidence that they have no plans to do that. Hogan is treating the crime as nothing more than a 2 second plot device with no long-term impact on the character: Elvis raped Sami. Elvis said sorry. Proceed to next plot point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have never heard one person say this rape storyline was a good idea. It was a mistake, a huge mistake, and one that needs to be dealt with by the characters involved. Any relationship between Sami and EJ needs to develop slowly and the rape must be dealt with. However, this is a show fighting for its life right now, and the chemistry between Sweeney and Scott can't be ignored. IMO, the writers would be crazy not to explore a pairing of these two. In real life would we be clamoring for Sami to forgive EJ and become friends, maybe lovers? Absolutely not. But this is a soap, not real life. If it represented real life, the Friday cliffhanger would be something like who ate the last piece of pizza from the fridge or is it going to rain Saturday and ruin my son's graduation party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I agree, Kenny. If written properly, I could buy it. But the way it's written now, I can't. It's like the rape is an after thought. Nobody cares about it. Like you said, they should tackle the situation head on.

For those long time viewers, how did they redeem Luke Spencer? How did they redeem Jack Deveraux? How did they redeem Jake McKinnon? All 3 rapists later turned into fan favorites. What's their story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sami raped Austin...and nothing legally was done about it...Billie raped Bo...and nothing was done about it. Are we REALLY that suprised.

The argument that a female HW would have socially revisted this is ignorance and speculation.

If Jack, Sami on DAYS and Luke on GH all can be redeemed from their acts of rape against other people, why can't EJ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still don't see the thing as rape, but that's my own personal opinion on the action. However, what EJ did was wrong, in the essence that he would pretty much allow Lucas to die had Sami not slept with him. And I agree that the issue was written horribly wrong. It was like the "rape" took about 3 weeks of Sami being scared of EJ, but then that was it. It was pretty much forgotten and it's now like Sami accidentally slept with EJ and that's how she became pregnant. That's how the family reacted to it today when it came up in conversation.

"Oh Sami, you should've chosen your actions better and not slept with a DiMera, you silly goose..."

<_<

Now I'm a huge EJAMI fan and I want the couple together in the end. That does not mean that I think that the incident should be forgotten. I think Sami and EJ have a lot to evaluate before anything turns romantic. I hope that is what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right, and this is the wrong way to write this story. Even with the rewrites that had to be done quicikly, the writers needed to spend more time dealing with the rape. They have blown it big-time, mostly because the rape happened in the first place and secondly by sweeping it under the rug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. First of all, believe it or not, there are victims of rape in real life who support the fictional couple of EJ and Sami. One of them I have seen post how she didn't get a chance to make a bargain with her rapist so she hates seeing Sami use that word for it in the first place.

I personally have HATED the rape storyline ever since I first got wind of it through the spoilers, thought it was rape when it happened because EJ did have the gun when they went through the roadblock but after rewatching the clip since then on YouTube and given how cavalier the writers have treated the incident in writing Sami's emotional response to the rape itself in the rape aftermath I came to view it as more of an indecent proposal/emotional blackmail/sextortion than straight up rape. If they weren't going to write Sami's reaction to it to be similar to what it was the first time we saw her raped then they never should have brought that word into the storyline. But they did. And they had EJ admit to Sami it was rape. So it's rape, I guess. Whatever.

To me, them going this route is them acknowledging what a mistake that storyline was and them taking steps to fix it. I am glad they are doing this. It is not like Days is the first soap to do something like this... I'm not just talking supercouples like Luke and Laura. Hell look at Miguel and Kay on passions. IIRC Kay raped Miguel to create their child and Miguel fell in love with her. It's not right but it's not the first time this has happened.

If Sami was my friend in real life, I wouldn't want her to fall in love with her rapist OR the man who framed her for a murder he committed sending her to death row/drove drunk and almost killed their child, but those are Sami's only options for a love life so it's hard for me to get my moral outrage up about this.

"I celebrate the chemistry, not the rape."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Maybe it’s me, and the fact that RC isn’t at the helm, but since Cwikly and Ford have taken over I’ve noticed the show doing a lot of things differently directing wise, and since the storyline of John’s demise began, the show has been using different scores, and dare I say better ones than this time last year. It’s interesting and I wonder if the any of it is Noel Maxam’s influence before being promoted.
    • I think Nicole is about to figure out what's going on between Andre and Dani.
    • @Efulton thank you. I don't know how I missed it or didn't recall it.  I'll blame amnesia . Anyway @Errol Could the newer thread be merged to the existing? Thanks in advance.
    • I just finished watching and I have to admit, not once did I find myself wondering who wasn't there. Quick question for anyone who followed this better than I did: was it only Andrew who rescued Cat and John from Clyde, or was Shane involved too? The reactions during their scenes today felt a little off to me. I know it was meant to be vague, but I didn't find it strange that they already knew each other.  
    • Yeah, financially, Luna is in better shape than Deacon and Sheila.   -- Scott Clifton must have decided to chew the scenery in every scene of this "Liam is Dying" storyline. Yikes.  
    • If J.R. wasn't busy with Ewing Oil, he'd be a heckuva soap recapper. He was SO gleeful at recapping Jenna-Bobby-Pam when the trio and Mark encountered each other at the Oil Baron's Ball. That being said, Lucy, presumably Sue Ellen and maybe Ray should all know this story, or at least part of it. Lucy was definitely at Southfork during Jenna and Bobby's relationship, and I believe Sue Ellen was about to marry J.R. around the time Jenna jilted Bobby. (Ray might not have given a damn.)
    • Broadcasting Magazine (May 5, 1980) : Future US-Next TV : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive On page 48 there's an interview with Lee Rich about Lorimar's fortunes.
    • Broadcasting Magazine (May 5, 1980) : Future US-Next TV : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive From a May 1980 Broadcasting issue: Meredith Broadcasting in association with Alan Sloan Inc has committed itself to produce series of five half hours in soap opera form, "designed for youngers 11-14 and their parents." Programs, yet untitled, "will deal with problems teen-agers face in their relationships with peers and parents," with script topics reviewed in advance by teachers, psychologists and others. First episode is to air on Meredith's five TV's in September and ground broadcaster also anticipates syndication. If successful, idea is to go to full-fledged series. 
    • Broadcasting Magazine (May 5, 1980) : Future US-Next TV : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Looking at an old Broadcast issue with a fall schedule preview. Their description of the show: Lorimar Productions turns its cameras "below the surface of a small, traditional, thriving college town still large controlled by its founders, the Millingtons." Plot elements include "nurtured dreams, closely-held desires, closeted shame and vital truths about friends and family." Lee Rich, Michael Filerman and David Jacobs are executive producers of the Roundelay production, in association with Lorimar.  They also mention the show in a small section about advertising's point of view.  Advertising agency reaction to the new fall line-ups announced by ABC and CBS last week varied. But upfront, some agency types were apprehensive that their advertisers might be turned off by some of the new "titillating" entries. "I'm concerned about the amount of permissiveness," said one executive, with CBS' Secrets of Midland Heights commonly mentioned as one possible offender.
    • I just saw this. Thanks for sharing. The classic Y&R thread may enjoy your posts. It was in very poor taste for Andy Cohen to blindside MTS with that type of question, but I'm not surprised as he's an awful person.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy