Jump to content

ATWT: Emily Spoiler


Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://boards.soapcentral.com/showthread.php?t=248514

According to the May 22 issue of Soap Opera Weekly, Emily will “disappear” (SOW’s word) in June, due to Kelley’s maternity leave. SOW doesn’t say how Emily will be written out. According to a quote from Kelley, she doesn’t plan on returning to tape ATWT until her children are back in school, probably mid-September, she says. So it sounds like Emily will be offscreen 3 to 4 months and not be seen again until October.

So me wonder's how Emily will disappear?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I know this is going to sound out there and crazy and probably will NOT happen but bear with me please.

Yall remember the convo that Emily and Cheri had about Cheri's clients wanting Emily more and more. Well maybe it was just me but I felt like Cheri was eyeing Emily like she was a piece of meat that could be bought and used however she desired. Although Emily turned her down I don't think Cheri was too pleased. In fact if I remember correctly she turned around as she was walking away and looked at Emily before going on her way.

Anyways my point is that maybe Emily somehow meets Cheri and gets tricked into accompanying her on some trip. This trip actually turns out to be a way for Emily to be sold into the Sex Slave Industry. Dusty of course would catch on that Emily is missing and that she met wtih Cheri but would be TOO LATE in his attempts to catch up to her.

Hence Emily would disappear into that sick and creepy world of abuse for months and then return. Possbily by escaping using her wits?

Anyways feel FREE to respond. And I won't mind if you say its ridiculous or stupid. Its just an idea. Not my lifes work...lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sooner than I expected, and I can't say I'm disappointed b/c I love my Em but I can't stand her story at the moment.

My guess, she'll 'disappear' to avoid wrath of Cheri or something.

My dream? Cheri is working for James, who also has baby Jenny, miraculously alive and well. They arrange for Emily to be kidnapped, leading to her return in the fall with Jennifer Stewart Ryan in her arms.

Hey, I said it was my dream! LOL! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy