Newt's a special being, which still leads me to wonder how on earth these women sleep with him and not want to recoil in horror. Then again, the situation with the first wife is no secret (married his high school teacher and filed for divorce while she was in treatment for cancer).

Eeww....I wasn't aware of that.

That is just wrong on so many levels.

Well that's a Republican for ya! Democrats do it and it's wrong, Republicans do it and there is nothing wrong with it.

Amen! I'm sorry with the whole Clinton thing, he lied about something that was frankly no one business but of course they were just waiting for an opporunity like this to come along to try and get rid of him. It was stupid but yet these are some of the same people who helped re-elect that moron into office. What was I thinking? They live to hypocritical assh*les! No wonder so many people dislike the US. They must think that we are stupid. Look at our leader. That is so sad that we do such a piss-poor job at electing people. But I feel a change coming soon!

Not a big shocker. I mean, we knew he had an affair long ago...just did not know it was during the whole CLinton lie.

The ONLY difference is Bill lied under oath and disgraced the Presidency. Both men are highly disgusting for treating their wives like [!@#$%^&*].

Disgrace...both men are listed under that word in the dictionary.

Blah and who would want to sleep with EITHER?

I'd so sleep with Bill. He's hot.

I'd so sleep with Bill. He's hot.

Oh, so would I. In the words of Barbar Shop 2

"he's a freak! And I likes me a freaky man!"

For me, the whole issue is that the man was questioned by his professional peers about his personal business. And he lied. Somehow, to me, that doesn't scream a solid perjury case to me. It screams playing dirty to gain an end. Yes, he still perjured himself, and since I can't remember what he was even being tried for, so therefore can't really argue whether the question was appropriate in the first place (though I can't comprehend when or how it would be).

For me, the whole issue is that the man was questioned by his professional peers about his personal business. And he lied. Somehow, to me, that doesn't scream a solid perjury case to me. It screams playing dirty to gain an end. Yes, he still perjured himself, and since I can't remember what he was even being tried for, so therefore can't really argue whether the question was appropriate in the first place (though I can't comprehend when or how it would be).

To me they spent millions on a blowjob and the predicatable result that he's lie about it.. like any politician would. What if the real reasons for invading Iraq were held to the same scrutiny?

To me they spent millions on a blowjob and the predicatable result that he's lie about it.. like any politician would. What if the real reasons for invading Iraq were held to the same scrutiny?

That is a very good point. And very true.