January

November 11, 200619 yr

Administrator

January 3-7, 2005

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,762,000 (-743,000/-689,000)

2. B&B 4,296,000 (-614,000/-615,000)

3. GH 4,048,000 (-300,000/-277,000)

4. AMC 3,978,000 (-545,000/+56,000)

5. DAYS 3,971,000 (-137,000/-295,000)

6. OLTL 3,715,000 (-382,000/-307,000)

7. ATWT 3,627,000 (-529,000/-634,000)

8. PSNS 3,196,000 (-76,000/+518,000) <--- Highest Ranking

9. GL 3,141,000 (-318,000/-399,000)

1. Y&R 4.5/15 (-.2)

2. B&B 3.5/11 (-.1)

3. GH 3.4/10 (same)

4. DAYS 3.2/10 (+.1)

4. AMC 3.2/10 (-.3)

6. OLTL 3.1/10 (-.1)

7. ATWT 3.0/9 (-.1)

8. GL 2.6/8 (same)

9. PSNS 2.4/7 (same)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. DAYS 1,729,000 (+206,000/-12,000)

2. GH 1,538,000 (-122,000/-59,000)

3. Y&R 1,509,000 (-129,000/-277,000)

4. PSNS 1,472,000 (+179,000/+361,000) <----Record high viewers

5. AMC 1,415,000 (-215,000/+90,000)

6. OLTL 1,321,000 (-170,000/-82,000)

7. B&B 1,172,000 (-162,000/-194,000)

8. ATWT 1,099,000 (-91,000/-57,000)

9. GL 945,000 (-15,000/-152,000)

Women 18-49

1. DAYS 2.6/14 (+.3)

2. GH 2.3/13 (-.2)

2. Y&R 2.3/13 (-.2)

4. AMC 2.2/12 (-.3)

4. PSNS 2.2/12 (+.2) <----- Ties highest rating and ranking

6. OLTL 2.0/11 (-.3)

7. B&B 1.8/10 (-.2)

8. ATWT 1.7/9 (-.1)

9. GL 1.4/8 (-.1)

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. PSNS 147,000 (-102,000/+85,000)

2. GH 89,000 (-9,000/+18,000)

3. OLTL 71,000 (-10,000/-4,000)

4. DAYS 62,000 (-101,000/+30,000)

5. AMC 59,000 (-38,000/+23,000)

6. Y&R 53,000 (-89,000/-4,000)

7. GL 32,000 (-86,000/+11,000)

8. ATWT 28,000 (-105,000/-9,000)

9. B&B 22,000 (-99,000/-33,000)

Women 18-34

1. DAYS 2.9/16 (+.3)

2. PSNS 2.8/16 (+.3)

January 10-14, 2005

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,319,000 (-443,000/-647,000)

2. GH 3,927,000 (-121,000/-153,000)

3. B&B 3,892,000 (-404,000/-499,000)

4. AMC 3,882,000 (-96,000/+260,000)

5. DAYS 3,675,000 (-296,000/-422,000)

6. OLTL 3,587,000 (-128,000/-151,000)

7. ATWT 3,489,000 (-138,000/-316,000)

8. GL 3,027,000 (-114,000/-88,000)

9. PSNS 2,688,000 (-508,000/+260,000)

1. Y&R 4.2/14 (-.3)

2. GH 3.3/10 (-.1)

3. B&B 3.2/10 (-.3)

4. AMC 3.1/10 (-.1)

5. DAYS 3.0/10 (-.2)

5. OLTL 3.0/10 (-.1)

7. ATWT 2.8/9 (-.2)

8. GL 2.4/8 (-.2)

9. PSNS 2.1/7 (-.3)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. GH 1,492,000 (-46,000/+1,000)

2. DAYS 1,458,000 (-271,000/-83,000)

3. AMC 1,351,000 (-64,000/+18,000)

4. Y&R 1,317,000 (-192,000/-312,000)

5. OLTL 1,301,000 (-20,000/-14,000)

6. PSNS 1,101,000 (-371,000/+174,000)

7. B&B 996,000 (-176,000/-231,000)

8. ATWT 947,000 (-152,000/-90,000)

9. GL 867,000 (-78,000/-83,000)

Women 18-49

1. GH 2.3/13 (same)

2. DAYS 2.2/13 (-.4)

3. AMC 2.1/12 (-.1)

4. OLTL 2.0/12 (same)

4. Y&R 2.0 (-.3)

6. PSNS 1.7/10 (-.5)

7. B&B 1.5 (-.3)

8. ATWT 1.4 (-.3)

9. GL 1.3 (-.1)

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. PSNS 130,000 (-17,000/+65,000)

2. DAYS 48,000 (-14,000/+28,000)

3. GL 45,000 (+13,000/ (+23,000)

3. GH 45,000 (-44,000/-4,000)

5. ATWT 30,000 (+2,000/same)

6. Y&R 29,000 (-24,000/+2,000)

7. B&B 23,000 (+1,000/-2,000)

8. OLTL 20,000 (-51,000/-4,000)

9. AMC 16,000 (-43,000/+10,000)

Women 18-34

1. DAYS 2.5/16 (-.4)

2. PSNS 2.1/13 (-.7)

January 17-21, 2005

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,571,000 (+252,000/-500,000)

2. B&B 4,222,000 (+330,000/-340,000)

3. AMC 3,936,000 (+54,000/+452,000)

4. GH 3,827,000 (-100,000/-5,000)

5. DAYS 3,768,000 (+93,000/-858,000)

6. OLTL 3,628,000 (+41,000/+57,000)

7. ATWT 3,592,000 (+103,000/-563,000)

8. GL 3,198,000 (+171,000/-15,000)

9. PSNS 2,810,000 (+122,000/-3,000)

1. Y&R 4.4/14 (+.2)

2. B&B 3.4/10 (+.2)

3. AMC 3.2/10 (+.1)

4. DAYS 3.1/9 (+.1)

5. GH 3.1/9 (-.2)

6. OLTL 3.0/9 (same)

7. ATWT 2.9/9 (+.1)

8. GL 2.6/7 (+.2)

9. PSNS 2.2/7 (+.1)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. DAYS 1,491,000 (+33,000/-276,000)

2. AMC 1,416,000 (+65,000/+200,000)

3. Y&R 1,410,000 (+93,000/-220,000)

4. GH 1,379,000 (-113,000/-25,000)

5. OLTL 1,311,000 (+10,000/+31,000)

6. PSNS 1,185,000 (+84,000/-8,000)

7. B&B 1,121,000 (+125,000/-148,000)

8. ATWT 1,011,000 (+64,000/-94,000)

9. GL 963,000 (+96,000/+37,000)

Women 18-49

1. DAYS 2.3/13 (+.1)

2. AMC 2.2/12 (+.1)

3. Y&R 2.1/13 (+.1)

4. GH 2.1/11 (-.2)

5. OLTL 2.0/11 (same)

6. PSNS 1.8/10 (+.1)

7. B&B 1.7/9 (+.2)

8. ATWT 1.5/9 (+.1)

8. GL 1.5/8 (+.2)

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. PSNS 123,000 (-7,000/-4,000)

2. AMC 69,000 (+53,000/+49,000)

3. DAYS 59,000 (+11,000/-53,000)

4. GH 56,000 (+11,000/-22,000)

4. ATWT 56,000 (+26,000/-13,000)

6. B&B 39,000 (+16,000/-30,000)

7. GL 36,000 (-9,000/+9,000)

8. OLTL 32,000 (+12,000/-5,000)

9. Y&R 29,000 (same/-34,000)

January 24-28, 2005

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,324,000 (-247,000/-1,267,000)

2. B&B 3,958,000 (-264,000/-1,036,000)

3. GH 3,949,000 (+122,000/-310,000)

4. AMC 3,870,000 (-66,000/-55,000)

5. OLTL 3,664,000 (+36,000/-268,000)

6. DAYS 3,517,000 (-251,000/-1,787,000)

7. ATWT 3,404,000 (-188,000/-752,000)

8. GL 2,724,000 (-474,000/-648,000)

9. PSNS 2,429,000 (-381,000/-601,000)

1. Y&R 4.2/14 (-.2)

2. B&B 3.3/11 (-.1)

3. GH 3.2/10 (+.1)

4. AMC 3.1/10 (-.1)

5. OLTL 3.0/10 (same)

6. DAYS 2.9/9 (-.2)

7. ATWT 2.8/9 (-.1)

8. GL 2.3/7 (-.3)

9. PSNS 2.0/6 (-.2)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. DAYS 1,435,000 (-56,000/-659,000)

2. GH 1,427,000 (+48,000/-243,000)

3. AMC 1,388,000 (-28,000/+79,000)

4. Y&R 1,380,000 (-30,000/-292,000)

5. OLTL 1,265,000 (-46,000/-166,000)

6. PSNS 1,072,000 (-113,000/-236,000)

7. B&B 1,049,000 (-72,000/-269,000)

8. ATWT 878,000 (-133,000/-197,000)

9. GL 752,000 (-211,000/-233,000)

Women 18-49

1. DAYS 2.2/13 (-.1)

1. GH 2.2/13 (+.1)

3. AMC 2.1/12 (-.1)

3. Y&R 2.1 (same)

5. OLTL 1.9/11 (-.1)

6. PSNS 1.6/10 (-.2)

6. B&B 1.6/9 (-.1)

8. ATWT 1.3/8 (-.2)

9. GL 1.1/7 (-.4) <---- all time low

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. GH 68,000 (+13,000/+6,000)

2. PSNS 64,000 (-59,000/-93,000)

3. Y&R 56,000 (+27,000/-36,000)

4. DAYS 35,000 (-24,000/-87,000)

5. OLTL 34,000 (+2,000/-5,000)

6. GL 32,000 (-4,000/-35,000)

7. AMC 31,000 (-38,000/-10,000)

8. ATWT 28,000 (-28,000/-42,000)

9. B&B 23,000 (-16,000/-74,000)

Edited November 11, 200619 yr by Toups

Views 6.7k
Created 19 yr19 yr
Last Reply 19 yr19 yr

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

No registered users viewing this page.

Passions Discussion Thread

I can't find the book in Canada - Amazon and Indigo/Chapters doesn't have it, and google didn't help.

By Toups · 1 minute ago1 min
Passions Discussion Thread

I just finished the book! overall it was a pretty good read...definitely more told of the POV and research of a fan which isn't a bad thing (going by JT Cornell is actually clever and hilarious!) and kind of more of a year by year recap of what happen on the show with little anecdotes thrown in. I definitely would love to hear more BTS stuff about certain stories and more of the actors words when it came to doing certain scenes and trying to make sense of the some of the more out there stories. It was good to learn a bit more about JER though. For as crazy as his storytelling was, it seemed everyone in the industry respected his ideas he bestowed upon daytime.

That was crazy to find out how affected Rodney Van Johnson really was at playing the "angry black man" and how he got PO'd at Chris Maleki's Spike for throwing fake punches at him ( I don't recall them fighting on the show though) That's scary he had to really wind down after filming to get all the anger out.
All the love for Ben Masters and the cast not knowing what was really going on with him before his death made me tear up a bit. I didn't realize how much he was involved in Tracy Ross's kids life too!

They even have quite a few paragraphs devoted to the the music having to be replaced on the SCI Fi and Superchannel rebroadcasts which is of course what I always complain about too! LOL That's why I always want to see the original broadcast 1999-2001 episodes pop up more where the music isn't messed with.

By YRfan23 · 21 minutes ago21 min
Passions Discussion Thread

It's funny, YouTube took me on a nostalgia trip rediscovering things from the early 2000s that I loved recently and I realized from adult eyes the same thing. I think for Passions it's probably the nostalgia factor, those 12-17 year olds are now in their 30s/40s reliving that time. Hard to know if I'd been as into it as an adult, but as a kid for whatever reason me an my friends were obsessed haha

By LostinHarmony · 46 minutes ago46 min
Another World Discussion Thread

Grant came first and Ryan followed, then Spencer, and eventually Kelsey. I really wanted to like Kelsey but Kaitlin Hopkins in the role rubbed me the wrong way.
It took some time for it to turn out that Ryan was Carl's biological son. If they had used Perry as Vicky's True Love maybe things would have swung the other way and Perry would have found out that he was Spencer's biological son, thus backing into the rivalry with Grant and ensuing triangle.

By Xanthe · 1 hour ago1 hr
Y&R: Old Articles

MTS has said that Victor/Nikki were an accident pairing and it was Bill Bell that saw the connection between her and EB before they themselves did. The audience clearly saw the connection too, since the My Fair Lady storyline took off.

By kalbir · 1 hour ago1 hr
ALL: Recasts who were quickly accepted by the audience

So Erica Hope original recipe Nikki Reed could have been another vixen from a working class background all about the come up in the vein of Brenda Dickson original recipe Jill. Of course Jill was more street smart than Nikki. Melody Thomas Nikki Reed didn't come across as being all about the come up but she got the come up when she became Mrs. Victor Newman.

By kalbir · 1 hour ago1 hr
Passions Discussion Thread

Yeah I mean Passions was definitely a cult classic & was my introduction to the soap world as a young millennial but re-watching this show as a grown adult, I realize just how much of it was hot garbage. There were good things about it but there’s a reason why most of Passions audience were so young. The S/L’s were stupid and there was hardly ever any payoff to any of them. If you compare any other soap to Passions around this time, it’s obvious JER was not giving us intelligent soap writing whatsoever. It was lazy… and I don’t have a problem with campy. It was just poorly done.
The amount of episodes that went on of Luis and Sheridan getting so close to telling Antonio the “truth” about their love, just for something super dumb to stop it is ridiculous. Or all the times Theresa would almost tell Ethan he’s little Ethan’s father but Pilar or someone else would stop it. Beyond frustrating! It actually got progressively worst over time. They probably had the best years right in the beginning because the budget was atleast there.

By Ryanc2 · 1 hour ago1 hr
Primetime stars - Their hits and misses...

I made the edit that it was 10 episodes. I was looking at multiple series and mixed up episode counts.

By ReddFoxx · 1 hour ago1 hr
Looking back...Primetime Ratings from the 80's

CBS thought Knots Landing at Thursday 9 pm could finish off The Colbys but that backfired because Cheers weakened Knots Landing. I don't think CBS was trying to tank job Simon & Simon.
NBC tank jobbed Hill St. Blues with the move from Thursday 10 pm to Tuesday 9 pm, where Moonlighting finished it off.
L.A. Law first Thursday episode was December 4, 1986 and it was Jeanne Cooper first appearance as Gladys Becker. I see what you did there NBC.

By kalbir · 2 hours ago2 hr
BTG: December 2025 Discussion Thread

Hey, Diego, Hey!!!

By Taoboi · 2 hours ago2 hr

Sign In

January

Featured Replies

Archived

Recently Browsing 0

Recent Posts

Passions Discussion Thread

Passions Discussion Thread

Passions Discussion Thread

Another World Discussion Thread

Y&R: Old Articles

ALL: Recasts who were quickly accepted by the audience

Passions Discussion Thread

Primetime stars - Their hits and misses...

Looking back...Primetime Ratings from the 80's

BTG: December 2025 Discussion Thread

Important Information

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)

Chrome (Desktop)

Safari (iOS 16.4+)

Safari (macOS)

Edge (Android)

Edge (Desktop)

Firefox (Android)

Firefox (Desktop)