Jump to content

P.J.

Members
  • Posts

    6,764
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by P.J.

  1. 2 hours ago, Paul Raven said:

    And wasn't it the case that McCrouch's Dusty had little to do with John but they had been close when Bloom played Dusty?

     

    John quietly disappeared out of town around the time Dusty reappeared. I think they did overlap slightly, but that was probably the main reason there wasn't a ton of interaction between McCouch and Bryggman. Except of course, at the end. This Carly/Jack fan still blesses his black heart for ordering that DNA test that proved Jack wasn't the father of Janet's baby.

  2. I understood why Wilson was brough on as Meg, given there were more connections with the current characters for Meg than Ellie. It was always canon that Holden and Meg were the closer brother/sister pair, and Meg's previous relationship with Dusty. I don't think Craig had been recast at the time of her hiring. There was also the initial subplot of Lucinda needing a nurse.

    But no....she certainly wasn't the troublemaking Meg of yore. She didn't even seem like a reformed troublemaker.

  3. 47 minutes ago, Donna L. Bridges said:

    Excellent! So good. Fun. Now I have to try to remember who Carly Lowe's husband was!

    Carly married Winston Lowe off-screen during Maura's year off the show (mid-96 to Sept 97). It wasn't revealed until Maura returned from her maternity leave in '99, to explain why she walked out on her 1st wedding to Jack. It would have invalidated Carly's marriages to Hal, Brad and John. Carly didn't think it was legal, but Winston died and she wanted to inherit any estate, so she never legally questioned it.

    So, it should be Carly Lowe Munson (invalid) Dixon (invalid) Snyder (invalid) Snyder Snyder Snyder.

    Lily Mason Snyder Grimaldi Santana Snyder Grimaldi 

    Jack Snyder---Julia Lindsay, Carly, Carly, Julia Larabee (invalid), Katie (annulled), Janet, Carly.

  4. 6 hours ago, I Am A Swede said:

    Oh I know the story and evolution of Barbara's character, and I'm sure it had more impact watching the show as a whole back then. But I just saw very little bitchiness from her in those clips. No real catty remarks, no innuendos, nothing like that. Even a goody two-shoes like Taylor on B&B was bitchier than that, even at the height of her saintly phase.

    True, they're probably not her bitchiest moments, but she's clearly not suffering fools or hypocrites either. She's clearly insinuating that Shannon's a golddigging slut, but without the name calling. 

    And I know HBS was well-regarded as Margo, but I got tired of her self-righteous speechmaking. She's giving me Janet Ciccone vibes in some of that, and that ain't good.

  5. 10 hours ago, NothinButAttitude said:

    This is for long-term ATWT fans who watched the shows in the 80s (I was born in the late 80s, so I only watched the show originally from the 90s onward with my grandma), why did so many fans hate the shift of Barbara around this time? I know a lot of longterm fans hated Barbara being made a bad girl.

    I feel like the shift in her attitude made sense. James gaslit and tried to kill her. Gunner left her to die. Brian broke up with her. She felt jilted by men. I think it made sense that she decided to wound the opposite sex after being wounded by them for so long. And busting up Tom/Margo made sense too as Tom was initial safe choice before she jilted him for James. It didn't probably help that the one that got away went on to find happiness with the woman that was James' mistress at one time. I get that folks felt that Babs was friends with Margo but it made sense. 

     

    My guess would be just resistance to change. I'm not sure Barbara was as beloved as Betsy, but viewers had watched her be a tortured heroine for years. She and Gunnar were very popular. I don't want to say ATWT viewers were stodgy, but I think once characters were "slotted", they expected them to progress in certain ways. A shady character could stay shady (ala John), but "good" characters were fundamentally good, and the goal a "bad" character should have is to be "better".  Barbara snapping and becoming a bitchy "slut" (c'mon, Tonio?) was a dramatic shift.  This is the same show that just a few years later tried the same shift with Heather Rattray's Lily, which didn't stick.

    It's hard to say, as I didn't have a lot of outside perspective at the time. I kinda remember the James/Barbara/Gunnar triangle, but it's hard to remember Barbara's personality. 

    Did people really think of Barbara and Margo as "friends"? After Margo had slept with James? Oy vey.

    And I hate to admit it, but in those scenes, Barbara makes Carly look like an amateur. Babs is stone COLD in dealing with Margo and Shannon. And *snort* at her dismissing Tonio. 

  6. 14 hours ago, soapfan770 said:

    Well said. I remember I couldn’t stand Molly for a couple years there until she was paired up with Jake, although I did like Molly with Andy. Although I also liked Andy and Nikki but that happened as Jordana Brewster’s time was winding down.When it came to diversity the biggest. disappointment came with hiring Monti Sharp with lots of hype but then turning Lew into a giant creep. Yikes. But Peter Parros was always good as Ben always underrated.

    Idk, stuff like bombing a boat on Nancy’s 80th birthday, Tom & Emily affair, Kirk and Sam literally disappearing, and drunk Lisa upset over John & Carly on Thanksgiving all just left a bad taste in my mouth. I might need to rewatch 1998 again myself. 

    TBH, '98 is hard for me to watch, after Feb. Jan-Feb wrap up the Teague case (Carly and Jack gtetting trapped in the tool shed, and finally admitting their interest in each other) but March they break up, she marries Hal and they bring on StJuliaI.  I don't particularly like Kirk/Sam, Eddie/Georgia/Tom/Emily/Margo, and I think the pest known as Katie also shows up in the summer/fall.

    I go back and forth on Molly. She's unapologetically slutty, but IMO, gets an unearned redemption after the chaos she caused accusing Holden of beating her up. Meanwhile, Carly is treated as the town tramp for marrying (!) and having sex with her husbands (!) (or at least 2 out of the 3).

    The one really good thing is that Hal gets revitalized via the involvement with Carly. As much as I had liked Hal/Babs back in the day, it was a crutch for the writers.

  7. I think the perception was as uneven as the writing. You've got good returns (Holden/Carly/Andy) and bad retcons (James and Lucinda's supposed love child David). Newbies Molly and Jack seem to struggle to find footing until Carly's return (I know, I'm biased) and Molly then takes the quickest sane-BSC--sane U-turn I can recall. 

    I do think the Ben Harris/Teague story doesn't get enough credit. Teague himself is one dimensional, but all the beats between characters we care about are played. It weaves in most of the town in one way or another. 

  8. On 7/17/2023 at 5:52 PM, antmunoz said:

    Martha, that storyline was the same giant stinking turd that Jack/Katie and Lily/Keith were.  But props for trying to write yourself a storyline. 

    Ugh. This is exactly why writers should never listen to actors pitching story ideas. It sucked, and it went against established character history. Holden and Carly never got along. And it really figures MB would paint Lily as the victim and Carly as dumb enough to "misinterpret" something between Jack and Lily. I knew there was a reason I hated her.

  9. Just watched a documentary on Valerie Perrine. I didn't really know much about her career outside of Superman. She's had health issues the last ten years or so. It's sad.

    But, why did no one tell me she was dating Jay Sebring, and was supposed to be with him the night of the Tate-LoBianco murders? DAMN. Someone called in that night, and she ended up having to go into work.

  10. 15 hours ago, DRW50 said:

    I do wonder if she had more of that fire as Rose Perrini on AW

    The moments when we got to see the coldness in Emma (usually with Iva) were compelling. I wish we'd gotten more exploration of this side of her.

    Now that I think about it---she went from being Maeve Kincaid's mother on AW to Lisa Brown's mother on ATWT..

    Someone posted a clip between Emma and Iva, which must have been right after she came home in 85, where she's asking Iva why she came home. And I think there was a point after Iva started therapy where she finally asked why she had been sent to her aunt and uncle's in Kansas, where Josh ended up raping her. That could've been explored more, but somehow the Snyder boys always got the focus. Iva was just expected to deal with her **it on her own.

  11. 59 minutes ago, DRW50 said:

    It's all a blur to me but for some reason I thought he was briefly involved with Lucinda around the time she and John were splitting up for good. I know she also had some encounters with the pilot who helped her find Sierra in '89.

    Now that you mention it I do think his corporate life was a bigger factor in their split.

    I'd forgotten until now that Warren Frost went on to play a strong support part on Twin Peaks. I wonder if that's one of the reasons he left ATWT

    The whole mother/daughter tension over a man was something they tried with Emma and Iva regarding John, but something about it always felt wrong to me.

    I remember the pilot. He was a crusty SOB. LOL

    Yeah, the Emma/Iva drama over John was a bridge too far.  Emma had no problem ripping into her kids over bad behavior, but while that romance was ill-advised, it was years after Emma had been involved with him.

    @DramatistDreamer that was the other problem with Liz becoming a regular. She was a full-on shrew with zero redeeming qualities. There was no reason for Iva to want that in her life. LOL She already had a narcissistic teen daughter who she had to bow and scrape to.

  12. @DRW50  I don't really recall. I can't recall Lucinda and Cal ever having a thing. John broke Emma's heart when he showed up married to Lucinda. 

    My guess is that Emma couldn't see herself fitting into Cal's world. She didn't want to leave the farm, she wouldn't have been comfortable splitting her time between Waco and Oakdale, and Cal didn't want to be Gentleman Farmer living in a virtual hotel with only one bathroom. (lol)

  13. 36 minutes ago, DRW50 said:

    I believe you're right.

    I definitely don't think they would have needed to move to Oakdale, but Iva going back and forth the way so many ATWT characters did under Marland and up to 94 or 95 could have made sense. And provided some drama for Ellie and Kirk too. 

    (didn't they also try to pair her father with Emma briefly - one of many Emma pairings that just felt very plot dictated)

    You don't remember the Great Appliance War between Jarrod and Cal? They fought over who could buy her a stove. Then someone bought her a new refrigerator. I think she stopped them from buying her a dishwasher. Emma didn't put up with such nonsense. LOL. 

  14. 4 hours ago, DRW50 said:

    That's a good point, although a part of me thinks if we were going to have them introduced, I wish they'd served more of a value. Maybe have Iva turn to them again during the Aaron storyline.

    Do I have some vague recollection of Liz sleeping with....Tonio?  Ah...sometimes incidental characters just need to stay incidental. No need for everyone under the sun to move to tiny Oakdale. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy