Everything posted by Skylover
-
Neighbours: Discussion Thread
Please sign the petition to save Steph Scully who it appears might have been axed. Thanks in advance. https://www.change.org/p/neighboursfans-com-save-steph-scully-neighbours
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
I feel differently but it has probably been a failure, they could still make it work but they're not keen to so fair enough. Big Mo back and still can't act.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
The ‘damage’ had been done. They might as well have tried to stick with it. Having Martin’s sister around was worthwhile, they haven’t really made the most of it. I’d much rather have her than Kat back again, talk about a dead-end.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
Stupid decision. John Yorke is past it.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
I think they delve into the characters more as there's more time to. I think the storylines American soaps choose are often far too unrealistic but I find the scenes are written well.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
I agree @Vee, the British soaps obviously have better production values but the American soaps are written better, I actually think day to day the writing is better on Days even if some of the stories are so ridiculously elaborate, the character writing seems to be better. I think EE's misery is what is killing it. It needs more upbeat stories, I've heard that Coronation Street has more comedy and upbeat stuff, not sure how true this is considering their recent male rape story and the Bethany stuff over the last couple of years, I don't watch that show but I'm not sure it's such relentless misery like EE.
-
Coronation Street: Discussion Thread
I'm so frickin jealous that Coronation Street gets this while Neighbours, Days of our Lives and EastEnders don't have that luxury. I don't even like Coronation Street. On the plus side I'm glad that a soap in this day and age is getting such a huge investment like this.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
Caught up. Mel and Hunter are fantastic.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
10 minutes into trying to catch up on EE and I feel like switching off. Ugh. Didn't feel like this on my Days catch up. The heist storyline is still going and it's a load of crap.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
Oh gosh, I guess I'll watch it anyway I'm gonna watch Days first though.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
I've been in Australia for a month so I haven't seen EE. Has it been any good?
-
Neighbours: Discussion Thread
Nice treat for long time fans.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
The show is chaos at the moment.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
There's little doubt I imagine that the Max/Stacey thing was rushed in time for Christmas Day, and it's a shame there was no build up. I agree that it makes sense Stacey would be bored, and I don't find it difficult to believe that she could be tempted by Max but the story could do with being a lot less blatant and written with more subtlety. Perhaps it would have been more interesting if it was just a kiss, initiated by Max, and Stacey hesitated for a moment. Stacey still could have said that she felt tempted and likes the idea of feeling free but wouldn't risk her marriage to Martin. We then could have done without the theatrics over the next few months between Martin and Stacey before they inevitably get back together, they could have played on the Max/Stacey connection and still have had Tanya jumping to conclusions about them. I do think Max and Stacey have undeniable chemistry but unless they're going to go the whole hog and let them have a relationship together I don't see the point narratively of them sleeping together other than for cheap thrills. I did like Max telling Tanya that Stacey was the love of his life which I could believe, but the writing decisions always seem so short-sighted. Until now I've expected Max to be written out as they've exhausted him so much and I don't see any way they can keep him on the show, do you think they honestly feel differently? It would be a mistake IMO to keep Max around now, especially as I do wish everyone involved in Max being sent to prison showed some remorse because as it stands Max is being painted as the one in the wrong and evil and while of course his actions are deplorable, Ian, Phil and everyone else involved need to be held accountable for their actions too and this needs to be shown on screen in order for those characters to feel less damaged. I get the impression this is what SOC was aiming for but JY's interpretation hasn't seemed to include this; no idea whether the way it's coming across was always intended to be this way but I always viewed SOC's vision of Max's revision as a way to reverse some of the damage done to so many characters as a result of the Lucy storyline. I do get the impression I'll be taking a break from the show soon. I did enjoy the Christmas episodes despite the flaws, but if I carry on watching once the casting changes take place it will be out of curiosity to see how crap it can get.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
I totally agree @BetterForgotten. The show is living in the past. At least SOC was keen to move things forward even if he did get it wrong many times.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
Very unlikely. Not sure if I'm that interested going forward considering all the dud casting changes though.
-
Neighbours: Discussion Thread
The Australian government has begun to contribute funding towards Neighbours as a production to keep it running, as it was deemed too important to the Australian film industry to lose. http://www.digitalspy.com/soaps/neighbours/news/a845914/neighbours-axe-government-funding/
-
Edge of Night (EON) (No spoilers please)
Was just reading about this soap. It sounds good. Sounds like the network stuffed it around a bit though.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
Some of those posters on DS are so dumb.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
Awful decision.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
They do, but it's the rougher, less educated ones.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
Could you elaborate?
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
The thing is she has been re-cast now, so I think it's worth trying to keep making it work. I think it could go either way, but I wouldn't be surprised if she was axed. What's the point in axing her when it's been done, the re-cast can't really be erased from history.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
I liked the Preston story but I think the idea of it was better than the execution. I think it could have been more nuanced than it was, but I think giving that story to such a big former character, and one who had been re-cast to boot, was a bit of a step in the wrong direction. I don't think people were ready for that. I found it believable from what I know about Michelle. I watched Grant and Sharon's wedding recently and I was surprised by how similar I felt the Michelles are. And I felt the same from the small amount of other stuff I've seen. Having said that, a few episodes doesn't compare to experiencing the character for her entire 10+ year tenure. I also feel like the Willmott-Brown stuff is the first time Kathy's felt alive for a while. I'm not sure if it's because the actress has had some cosmetic work but the acting has felt a little off a lot of the time since she's been back. I really hope not with Luke/Ben. I can't wait for the show to move on from this stuff though because so little makes any sense. I just hope there are some characters left who I actually want to watch after they've axed most of the ones I like.
-
EastEnders: Discussion Thread
In what sense? Physically?!