Jump to content

Movie Reviews


Maxim

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

2/10

This doesn't feel like a movie, but more like a computer game. The cringe robotic cat that is always silent and completely unrealistic adds up to that effect. Not scary. Just bland. Was falling asleep. Expected much MORE. 

NEEEXT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

We are finally going to see Longlegs tonight! It's finally in cinemas all around town.

We are going in 4 hours and I'm already soo excited. I've been dying to see this movie for a year now.

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

10 OUT OF F-CKING 10

WOW!

I can't say how much I LOVED this movie. I used to be a huge horror fan back in the day, and I'm a true crime researcher, so it DOES take a lot to scare me and disturb me. LIKE A-LOT. But just hearing the strange feminine voice of Nicholas Cage's serial killer in the first minutes of the movie... made my blood go cold. What a monster of character Cage created! This will be studied for decades, believe me! It's Baby Jane and Joker level of legendary. 

I was feeling uneasy and wanting to leave the cinema after the first 5 minutes. If it wasn't for my husband, I probably would have left. I even stood up and tried to couple of times, but he stopped me. I'm a 29 year old man and I watch The Bold And The Beautiful - it takes a lot to scare me! 

The movie is for 16+ age group, so you can guess how unsettling it is. It starts terrorizing you in the first couple of minutes and doesn't let you have a calm minute till the end.  BRUTAL. I can't believe I didn't go out of the cinema. 

The face of Longlegs has literally been engraved in my mind right now... and I don't know how I'm going to sleep.  

It goes straight to Number 1 of my list of horror movies.

BRAVA! It's doing amazing box office right now too! 

I recommend it only to people who have healthy mental situations and can handle disturbing things. I don't recommend to people who haven't regularly watched horror movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

We spend money on tickets and food for this piece of [!@#$%^&*] in the cinema... that I will need therapy to forget how bad it was.

A complete disgrace and joke compared to the original. It felt like a teen-parody. Bad acting. Cringe scenes. Absurd. 

0/10 - the worst movie I've seen in my entire life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

I don't care about the hate that Blake Lively's been getting. I don't care if she is a mean girl in her real life or not... I only care that she gives a performance of a lifetime in this movie.

I left the theatre with tears in my eyes. A stunning performance, that made me re-live part of my childhood. Deals with the important and hard issue of domestic abuse.

Stunning, hard to swallow, making you question things in your life, movie.

10/10! 

I really don't care about the haters and people saying the movie is bad just to pile on the Blake Lively hate train.

It's not bad. It's not good. It's a masterpiece. Yes, melodramatic, but still masterpiece.

Rocked me to my core!

Please register in order to view this content

@Liberty City

@Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

7/10

The first one hour is solid 10/10, but the last 45 minutes have a lot of cringe moments and unbelievable twists... that I still enjoyed, but the movie slipped into American Horror Story level of camp while at first it had more class.

I loved it though, since it kept me interested and for a person with ADHD like me... this is hard to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

Please register in order to view this content

4.5/10

So disappointed. I had bigger hopes for this movie based on the trailer. But I should finally learn my lesson that is - the best movies always have bad trailers and vice versa.

The first 30-50 minutes it was building up nicely and I would have given it a solid 6,5 - 7, but then the second half ruined what it build up.

It took everything that worked in Rosemary's baby and turned it into the most basic Netflix-type movie style of film-making. So uninspired and reductive.

And the worst part of the whole experience was that this movie was not creepy or scary AT ALL. I was waiting for that moment of dread that never came. It was not campy either, which could have saved it. 

Overall it is a testament to how GREAT Rosemary's baby was. It makes Rosemary's baby seem like the world's most creepiest movie ever. And apartment 7A is like a piece of cheap candy. 

Sigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

One of the most absurd things I've watched in my entire life. Such a fall from grace... in comparison to the first movie. A horrible, unforgettable flop. A confused mess. Lady Gaga acting in CINEMA should be against the law. Like... she literally has to be stopped.  I'm traumatized from how bad this movie was. I really can't believe they thought this should follow the original Joker. Disturbing.

 

@Liberty City

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

P.S People in the cinema were cringing and laughing. This was a complete opposite reaction to what the first movie delivered back in the day. I remember how FREAKED the whole room was at the premiere of the OG movie. 

Disaster. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
    • I can actually buy Brook Lynn being so self-absorbed and incurious that she never thought to question why her mom and grandma were so attached to Gio. 
    • It was overkill and the whole narrative Lois was too nice to the orphan kid when he was little, WHAT? Like Emma said no one thinks Gio is a troublemaker that gets 14-year-old kids drunk for fun. That being said, Lulu figured this Gio thing out in episode, but Brook Lynn never once questioned Lois and Gloria attachment to a child that was the same age as the baby she gave up?  Ever?
    • Thanks for finding that. I may have been thinking of this blog entry.
    • Just watched the "Dante Screams At Gio" scenes. Jesus. Talk about overload and overkill. That was obnoxious.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy