Jump to content

The Pop Music Thread


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Didn't know where to post this, but I found it a fascinating article about how some pop music is made. I'm not a big Rihanna fan, but I have liked some of Stargate's work for other artists. I found this article fascinating. It's a long read, but I had never heard such a detailed report on how some pop music now is made; with producers coming up with basic cords and sounds, then a writer (in this case wanna be pop star Ester Dean) picking which she likes, improvising a melody line, coming up with a few catchy phrases, etc, etc Worth reading for any current pop fan.

Also interesting--I always wondered about Stargate--how these very Europop producers from Norway who were huge in the UK ten years back, then were seen as passe there, suddenly became even bigger in the US--it mentions how their sound has helped transform America's urban music into the current slightly more Europop Urban music that's everywhere (and could disappear soon anyway).

http://www.newyorker...a_fact_seabrook

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That was a very interesting article. I didn't know about the Beyonce/Kelly similarity. Already Gone was only released because another single was pulled at the last minute. It's not a great song and wasn't that big of a hit compared to her other singles on that album.

I'm a little surprised Rihanna has stayed popular as long as she has in this burnout world, especially since she was always far more likely to suffer career burnout for what Chris Brown did to her than he was, and then the backlash over her sexual image, etc. We've come a long way (or regressed, some would say) from a decade ago when Britney and Christina were both so condemned when they went into their attempts at sexiness. Now it almost seems required, or there are different types of sexiness (playful, violent, girl next door).

Sometimes I feel like Rihanna is a blank slate, and I am very disturbed (especially if she is getting closer to Chris Brown again), but I do think she is the best representative of this type of pop. "Rude Boy" and "We Found Love" are great songs, even with the shrillness and canned vocals, because of how she powers them.

The Ester Dean story is also fascinating.

I like the part at the end when they're worried Adele is the beginning of the end for them. I think the two genres can probably co-exist for a while.

The connection between the old girl groups and today's pop women doesn't work for me, mostly because the former era was about the voice, whereas today seems to be about visuals as much as the hooks. I'd compare it more to disco, or the golden era of Madonna and the other 80's goddesses.

I didn't know what Irreplaceable was and then I looked it up and remembered "To the left, to the left." I guess the hooks are their main strength.

It is a little strange to realize that rock and hip-hop have had such declines in recent years. I didn't realize until I read something a few days ago about how 2011 was the first year in some time hip hop had stopped having steep decline sales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I appreciate you reading it Carl, I know it's pretty long.

One thing I appreciated about the article is that while, like I said, the Rihanna style isn't really my bag (though I love some of her songs--you mentioned We Found love which actually is kinda interesting that it was a hit as it was done with UK producer/DJ Calvin Harris who pop wise has mainly worked with the likes of Kylie--he did fan fave In My Arms for her which is a fave), it's rare to see major music critics still take pop production seriously, or even give it credit while admiting how in some ways it is so manufactured. Usually the attitude is completely dismissive--but as the article said there probably is more innovation, mainstream music wise right now there's far more innovation in the pop world than rock, which (even as I usually prefer pop) wasn't as true in, say, the 90s.

I pretty much agree with eveyrthing you say. I'm surprised by Rihanna's success too--the article kinda alludes to the fact that one thing they've been smart about with her is releasing album after album after album--even in a way few other artists do. Because she is a bit of a blank slate, but I admit she does what she does well.

You're right about image--though I do think the connection to the pre-Beatles girl groups holds some weight just in terms of how the producers and writers worked with them.

And thank God that the shift from hip hop has happened (even the hip hop that does sell well tends to have the euro/dance influence). While I still find mainstream radio pretty boring, I have less issue having someone turn it on in the car now than I did 5-10 years backj, but I admit that's a personal thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I don't think they were prepared for Sherry Mathis to exit. I think the scripts were written well in advance and they didn't expect her to go. Louanne was on the very next episode and a terrible recast.  Erwin Nicholson made the same mistake in casting with Nicole on Edge but they gave the character some weeks or months rest before they brought in Jayne Bentzen, I believe.  As I stated above, in rewatching these posted episodes, I am making a guess that Mayer/Braxton wrote many weeks in advance because of the Spring 85 writers' strike.  While the strike lasted only two weeks, SFT is the only P&G soap that had writer credits through the two weeks of air shows that included the strike weeks. I also am guessing that Mayer was signed to a six month minimum (soaps typically have actors and writers on 13 week contracts) and Mayer was fired exactly at 26 weeks from the day his material first started airing.  He was a disaster for the show and Erwin was tired and not what the show needed although scoring Lambie as Lloyd was his top achievement (he lasted a little less than 1 year).
    • @Maxim https://www.facebook.com/reel/4165068087116271  
    • I think Steve and Shawn track down Kevin and Jeffrey gives them one dose on the sly in exchange for keeping it quiet. John's organs will go to Bo. We know he's not really coming home. Xander won't make the board meeting so EJ will get the hospital by default. And Kate will tell Xander that Sarah lied to him precisely because she feared he would do something like this to Philip  Those are my Friday predictions! Was a good show. I felt Philip's fear in that last scene.
    • @MaximBoth of Diana Ross's daughter are so talented but also they are a hoot! Check Tracee out here. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIgzye6xqYQ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And now all the episodes are gone. SMH. These jackasses never stop 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Not much happened today. But @brisbydog, all of our wish came true: no Leo this week

      Please register in order to view this content

      I guess Susan was necessary today, but I really wish she’d leave. Marlena putting EJ on blast about Belle was pretty good though, and I hope they continue to use Marlena in their storyline. I’m interested in seeing what happens to EJelle in the aftermath of the John storyline. And I really wish we were seeing Paul and Andrew moving in on John’s location. If they can’t get Christopher Sean on the show, they should at least try to get Colton Little.  I liked how smart Xander was today and that he immediately that Philip stole the drug. He did a pretty good job in his scenes where he confronted Philip as well. I also appreciate the way that Philip’s been written lately; more like a tragic hero than a bratty, goofy clown. Which is all the more reason that I hope the triangle with Stephanie and Alex is revived. But Xander did seem a little overly melodramatic in his last scene though And, I can’t help but think that Dr. Russell being so hesitant about involving the police in the drug theft could be a sign of something. 
    • I haven’t watched since Daisy’s last episode. Part of me feels like its a good place to end it because outside of The Platt’s, Tracy, Todd, and Carla and Swain I haven’t really enjoyed the show. Too many depressing stories and irksome characters, I especially hate what they’re doing to Debbie. I do think its funny they spent all this time investing into that awful new family and apparently they’ve already been canned, feedback must have been horrid.
    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy