Jump to content

Genre + Period: Dramas in Development Season


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

First of all, do you too have a problem with genre, what exactly is genre?! blink.gifrolleyes.gif Someone called Marty asked the same down below, I thought I was the only one. It must be some kind of synonym for niche.

Anyway, do you think genre and period per se are the problem or is it the shiteous writing? Then again, if the writing were above average, is it something that would attract a significant audience, a show being either genre or period? Does mainstream exist today or are the audiences so much fragmented served by so many specialty networks, cable channels etc. that there really is no point in attracting such audience?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yes, I'm going to need someone to explain to me what a "genre show" is. I've seen it before, but I thought maybe I was reading something wrong or someone made a typo, but nope, here it is, referenced several times. Honestly, it seems to me just a pretentious way to refer to sci-fi/fantasy shows without owning the stigma of sci-fi/fantasy shows. Stupid, but whatever.

I think shows like that have to work harder to attract an audience because most people aren't interested in period pieces. Well, it depends on what period. When I hear "period piece," I think of 18th/19th century stuff set in England. But apparently 80s New York qualifies as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Genre is basically a type and in modern fiction it usually comes to mean a type not based in realism like cop shows, lawyer shows or medical shows. Hawaii Five-0 is not really genre, but Smallville is. Dracula is genre, but Nip/Tuck is not. True Grit will be genre, but Little Fockers is not. Science-Fiction, horror, superheroes, fantasies, westerns, spies with crazy gadgets...this is basically the modern definition of genre.

Period basically is anything that requires costumes and sets that you would not find today--trying to capture a time. If you did a movie set in 1983 with a group of girls all dressed like Madonna from Desperately Seeking Susan you have a period piece, but in 1983 it was not a period piece at all. Jack the Ripper is a period piece, Sherlock Holmes too, but so is that TV show on HBO about the roaring 20s.

I love genre because when a show steeps itself in genre it is allowed to be crazy and embrace all kinds of unrealistic conventions that if you plopped them down in the middle of Law&Order it would be seen as horrible. Do Science Fiction and Fantasy have a stigma anymore? The box office would indicate otherwise. They were once the domain of shlock movies and TV shows for kids, but all the biggest movies from Harry Potter and Twilight to LOTR to Spiderman and Dark Knight to Star Wars are all genre. Smallville has been running for ten years, that zombie show set records, True Blood seems to be a water cooler show, LOST was too...it seems easier to find a genre show than a non-genre show that makes its mark in the pop culture these days.

Mainstream has a mild success in Hawaii Five-0 from what I read, but the thing with mainstream "normal" shows is they don't seem to get the passion going the way these niche/genre shows do. I have never heard of anyone saying "Oh my God! Did you see Gray's Anatomy last night?!?" the way I have heard people talk about True Blood which has a smaller audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know, I just find that stupid. Swashbuckler, horror, thriller, spy, noir, yakuza... Those are some examples of genre. Everything belongs to a certain genre, there are no TV shows, movies, novels etc. that aren't a type of genre.

I don't remember who it was, I believe it was alphanguy, but I think it was a nice thesis: X generation and the generations which follow it closely have increasingly produced a bunch of insipid, lifeless, fake TV shows no one really gives a damn about. Either they're half-as$ed attempts at something or are so convoluted they fall under their own burden of importance and shock value or whatever.

Lost being a flagrant example of utter irrelevance and nonsense, the show which went from top to flop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Totally.

If it's science fiction, call it science fiction. And good lord, if you're going to use another word to sound hip, make sure it's a word that isn't already tied heavily to the concept you're referring to. It's like referring to strawberry as "flavor" and anything else as non-"flavor."

Oh, God, yes. It's hard to get into many shows today because there's just too much [!@#$%^&*] to remember, and it's very overwhelming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see in the primetime forum pages devoted to Greys Anatomy--a show I would be ashamed for myself if I ever watched it. I see pages devoted to Shonda Rimes, and I had to google the name to learn who Shonda was. I think it is possible you are just coming from a different area of taste and what you see as legit TV and what you see as nonsense. I look at all those shows on ABC like Brothers and Sisters, GA, and all their cousins, and it baffles me how anyone can watch them--they can only be described as piffle and tripe if you ask me. I don't think I have ever met anyone in real life who watches any of those type of shows. But I knew a ton of people who watched LOST, and watch True Blood and all the others. Then there are people who live for cop shows and watch L&O and Dexter. That's why they make all these shows: so some people can watch domestic dramas aimed at women, others can watch cop shows galore, and still others can watch byzantine science fiction dramas. And maybe some people will watch all three and sitcoms too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The way I see it, you're a fanboy (yes, with y) – you are very, very, extreeemely hit and miss plus dismissive; you lack width. One the one hand, you find DOOL superb and defend the shiteous Lost finale, on the other, you have some very, very nice observations (all of which I'm forgetting right now).

All My Shadows, in many ways your antipode, has missed the century (in which to be born) – or at least the decade. grinning-smiley-9513.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Source for this? Especially since Benz was already on AMC as Linda Connor.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Julie Benz (Darla, BTVS/Angel) auditioned with SMG for the role of Kendall Hart on All My Children
    • @soapfan770 1995/96 to 1999/2000 were not very good in primetime. CBS and ABC both had primetime mess eras, and that's how NBC got away with their Thursday garbage shows finishing in the Top 10. Remember too that ABC was sold to Disney in 1996.  As for ABC primetime mess era, it started with the Top 10 fallout of Roseanne and ended with the breakout success of Who Wants to be a Millionaire. Monday Night Football and Home Improvement pretty much kept ABC alive in that era.
    • This show is miles better under the new writers. It's really a condemnation of Carlivati, because he had the characters and history to write good soap. Instead, he turned it into a joke and a farce. I've heard some people says DAYS is now "too talky." Miss me with that stupid analysis.
    • I always wondered if Jackie wasn't going to be recast after being persumed dead... if Marland was going to pair Evie and Justin as a couple reunited in grief over Jackie's death. The one consistent thing I noticed about Evie during those months she was still on the show was that she was kind of a second mother to Phillip after Jackie's 'death' and Elizabeth no longer on the canvas.   But then one of the three interim writer teams decided to pair up Helena with Justin.. which left Evie even less to do than she had at the start of 1983. You're right that Evie was a unique character on the soap.  She was sweet and trusting, yet she had a quiet strength that made it difficult to push her around (at least when the Dobson's were writing her).  The Ben/Amanda/Eve triangle was an interesting triangle because neither of the women were evil... and Ben did have chemistry and a connection with both women.   It had a pretty decent run from 1978/9 to 1982 before Amanda was spun off into her mother's new marriage to Mark as the other woman.
    • Lots of fast-forwarding in today's episode. The best parts were the Lulu and Tracy scenes and Chase in the tank top. And once again, a horrible cliffhanger with Sonny.
    • A very very brief excerpt from a CBS special is up. That's it. @jam6242 Thank you for the lovely Susan article. I adore that photo of her with Denise - such strong yet different personalities on display.  I remember seeing that photo of Denise, Bill and Susan on soap magazines like Afternoon TV. I wonder if they took it or if DAYS did.
    • I think Joss does know the material and maybe just plagiarized some of Emma's data?   Despite all her actions I do think the show pretends Joss is smart and this class is sort of in her new wheelhouse as a degree. Gio playing Carmen was super high pitched to me.  He's a talented musician but that was screechy lol. TBH, we all know I love Sonny to a fault, but I would rather stare at Rebecca Herbst's opening picture for an hour than listen to Sonny and Jason blather on about giving up the mob.  You can't even try to fake me out at this point.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy