Jump to content

Marquee College Sporting Events Move To Cable.


bellcurve

Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/23/business/la-fi-ct-turner-20100423

CBS cuts in Turner on NCAA basketball tournament

Under the new $10.8-billion deal, every tournament game will be on TV and production costs will be shared between the two broadcasters.

The great programming migration to cable continues.

Turner Broadcasting, just one week after signing former NBC late-night host Conan O'Brien, has teamed up with CBS in a 14-year, $10.8-billion deal for television and Internet rights to the immensely popular NCAA March Madness college basketball tournament.

The move comes as broadcast television struggles with rising programming costs and greater competition for viewers and advertisers. Although the NCAA tournament is a strong performer for CBS, the costs of covering the games were starting to outweigh the benefits for the network. By sharing the load with Turner, CBS can hold on to a big chunk of a marquee event with fewer financial risks.

With many of its big postseason games now headed to cable, the National Collegiate Athletic Assn. joins Major League Baseball, the National Football League and the National Basketball Assn. in going where the money is. Next year, most of the major bowl games and college football championship will be on ESPN, formerly mainstays of the networks.

Both ESPN and Fox Broadcasting made a run at the NCAA tournament, but CBS and Turner were always the front-runners. The two broadcasters had initially discussed teaming up on a bid for the event last fall and are already partners on PGA golf.

Although CBS' previous $6-billion deal ran through 2014, the NCAA had the option after this year's tournament to void it. CBS wasn't opposed to the NCAA exercising that option because, under the terms of the current contract, its rights fees were set to shoot up dramatically in future years.

The new deal "puts CBS on solid financial footing for lasting profitability," said CBS Sports President Sean McManus. If a new pact had not been struck it would have been "very challenging" for the network, he said.

Under the deal, Turner will pay the NCAA the $10.8 billion over the term of the deal and CBS will pay Turner its share. CBS also acquires some protection against potential losses. According to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing by Turner parent Time Warner Inc., any losses greater than $670 million suffered by CBS will be covered by Turner.

For the first five years of the deal, TBS will carry first- and second-round games of the tournament, then in 2016 TBS will start to alternate coverage of the Final Four weekend and championship game with CBS. Overall, Turner will have about 65% of the tournament's games on its cable channels TBS, TNT and TruTV over the life of the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Sorry if this has been posted before or if it's old news, but this is very interesting and I'm posing some rather relevant questions:

And it sounds like if you want to watch sports in this decade, you're gonna have to get cable. What does all this mean for network television, where big ticket sporting events like the the BCS Bowl(now exclusively an ESPN event) and The Final Four(after 2016 swapping it every other year with CBS) move exclusively to cable? The only good thing about the TBS deal is that every game will be on television now instead of CBS cutting into East/West coast feeds for each other's games. All one has to do to find their school that they are rooting for in the playoffs is to look at the programming schedule instead of hoping/praying that CBS won't annoy the piss out of you by cutting into you're already-in-progress game to cover the last minute of some Ivy League school's playoff game.

It also makes me wonder whether The Super Bowl(which drew in an audience bigger than the M*A*S*H finale in February) and the NBA Finals are gonna make a move to cable this decade as well? Sporting events are huge draws for network television. Without them, the ratings across the board suck more often than not. CBS didn't fully recover from losing NFL Football until Les Moonves came in. And NBC, although they have Sunday Night Football and the Super Bowl back,(IIRC) went for one year without the NBA and the NFL. Couple that with terrible program development, and NBC's been in the toilet ever since.

I wonder if this was part of TBS' plan in wooing Conan O'Brien all along? Hoping that male sports auds will find him appealing after the playoff games air on their network as a lead-in to his show?

Will this lead to the ultimate death kneel for network, over-the-air, free television?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • John Black actually was the ultimate good guy soap hero. So I don’t mind the town gushing over him. It’s deserved.
    • Be glad it wasn't a Perry production. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I love my girl, but nope he's pathetic. 250K and now he's put her business at risk.   L O S E R    

      Please register in order to view this content

    • The whole town gushing over John Black as if he was a saint is eye rolling.  I guess death really colors people's memories over his many flaws, but I guess that is normal and human nature. I'm still confused as to why Leo hasn't been written out.  The actor stank up two soaps with his sub par acting, what does he have on TPTB's to remain on these soaps.   What's the point of Cat?  I hope the new head-writers figure out her purpose and develop her character. And I much prefer scenes not focusing on John's death because life does go on for the world when someone passes.  
    • Wasn't there a break in Zaslow's first run? I thought Roger was off-screen for a while, and when Zas came back, Roger was hiding at the boarding house and Nola figured out there was something hinkey about him. I'm pretty sure Simon chose to leave the first time and was replaced by RVV. I don't want to assume Jordan's issues played a role in his first departure, but Maeve said in an interview that at some point, it became very hard for her to work with him and she asked to work with him less. That seems to fit 1986, where suddenly Vanessa is essentially Ross' law clerk and not at every Lewis family moment.
    • He needs to divorce her arse with her constant cheating.   She's no better than Doug... she's F*cking pathetic.
    • I didn't know of any interruptions for Maeve Kinkead after her 1997 return. Her runs would then be 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-2000, short arcs until the end. I knew Maureen Garrett second run was interrupted from a 2009 interview but I couldn't recall the exact year. Her runs would then be 1976-1980, 1988-2000, short arcs until the end.
    • As I said in May, I have no problem with Martin and Bradley being married. You can still do all the fun introloper storylines with them as you do everyone else. Both men of a certain age, and it is very believable for them to have either a first love or have been previously married. And, you can do it without either of them cheating!  

      Please register in order to view this content

       I said something similar during the premiere week. Bill was the perfect age to play Martin as Vernon and Anita's child. I would've much preferred this version, but oh well.
    • I don't know how you want to count Maeve. She "retired" in '00, but would come back for appearances. I don't know however if she made an appearance in '01 or '03. In '02 I believe she came back for Josh and Reva's wedding. I assume she came back when Gina Tognoni took over the role of Dinah. And I know she was back for Ross' memorial service. Maureen Garrett was around until at least '00. I don't think Holly was in town when Ben returned though. I just got pissed off about Jerry all over again.
    • So, pretty sure Zaslow, Garrett, Kinkead, and Newman all chose to leave the first time. (If that's wrong, please correct me). Bernau - not sure why he left the first time. Was it voluntary? Or did they decide to write him out? They were writing so many out during that time period. It always seemed odd to me that they introduced Alex, FINALLY giving him someone he could talk to, and then he was written out. Or maybe that's why they made Alex his sister, so she could take his place as the head of the Spaulding family? Would love more intel on that if anyone knows. Simon - was he replaced by RVV? Or did he voluntarily leave the first time? It seems to me like one of those times TPTB decided to sex up or glamorize a character (and it clearly flopped). If he was fired, interesting he came back. Again, would love if someone could spill the tea. Clarke - I've always assumed he left because of his personal issues, but not sure if that was the case the first time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy