Jump to content

AMC: Wednesday


Recommended Posts

  • Members

You know, this all convinces how much I hate the labels "gay" and "lesbian."

It seems that you can only be extremely one way or extremely the other, or, if you're like me, squarely in between. I believe that there are certain degrees of gayness and straightness and, while I know it is definitely not the intent of the writers of AMC, Bianca is a perfect example of a character who has identified herself as a lesbian only because it's one of the choices that's been put in front of her. Not the choice to be a lesbian, but the choice to call herself one.

ETA: I should mention that I know I'm not squarely in between being gay and straight. Bisexual is just so much easier to say than explaining that I'm more attracted to guys that girls...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well I AM a gay woman and I believe I have the right to call myself that and it just means I am hot for women and not men. There is a difference in labels and self-identification. And I am not saying *everyone* is gay or is flexible or bi- or straight. I am saying that *Bianca* has self-identified as lesbian and has gone to lengths when coming out to force herself to be attracted to male physicality for Erica's sake and she couldn't get into it, even when getting drunk to kiss that dude in high school. She has been consistently portrayed as NOT attracted to male bodies physically and attracted to women only. This story does not honor Bianca's history or her integrity.

With all due respect, you've actually bastardized the gay postion politically right now, insofar as Being Gay is a Choice vs. Being Gay is Not a Choice. Who we love has not one damned thing to do with soul love or ignoring the external manifestations of biological gender. You are simply restating the agenda AMC and GLAAD is pushing. If no one discriminated by gender in looking for a partner based on their sexual orientation, then we'd all be bisexual. There would be no "gay," no "straight."

I have never seen, in the context of arguing against those who, for example, have made constitutional amendments around the country proscribing gay marriage, the gay movement EVER say we "don't see...man or woman." It is the proponents of The Defense of Hetero Marriage that believe being gay is a choice, not gays (for the most part, there is division of opinions in all groups). Those who fight against gay marriage, don't believe being gay is hard-wired, rather that is a behavioral choice. And that gay people can choose NOT to be gay if they try.

This romance, again whether intentional or not is giving fodder to those who believe that with the "right" man or with a "feminine enough" man that Bianca as a lesbian should find Zoe "woman enough" to satisfy her as a lesbian, even now...in Zoe's currently still 100% biologically male state.

The gay movement in general, the political line, if that's what you are discussing, has not one damned thing to do with "soul love and bodies don't matter"...I am not sure at all where that is coming from other than McT. Perhaps that is true for bisexuals or people who are more hetero/homoflexible (and I recognize that sexual orientation is a range, a scale...) but I don't think it applies to truly GAY people. Especially not as presented on AMC.

For the record, there's not a damn thing wrong with Bianca, if she were a real person, falling for whomever she chooses, whatever their gender...and I would respect that in real life. However, I still would not consider an attraction on the part of RL Lesbian Bianca to still biologically male (with inner woman, not yet physically expressed) as a lesbian one. I would consider it more bisexual than lesbian until Zoe was much further along in transition. That's not a judgement. Just don't think it's gay. But Bianca is more than just an individual character and like it or not as a nearly unique presence in Daytime, I think it's on TPTB to present Bianca in a more typical, what most people understand to be lesbian context than being in a romance with girlfriend who's physical gender is not yet available or visible. Show the rule before you show the exception. They've undershown Bianca's relationships with bio-women, have been raped away, avoided, truncated, sent it offscreen.

IMO, what goes on in RL, does not necessarily make the right story for an individual character and I don't think this story is right for Bianca. The attraction to Zarf and Zoe and the pursuit of Zoe has created hetero-dreams for Bianca in viewers who do not understand all the sensitive and complicated gender and orientation politics involved. There are straight viewers I've read on many sites who hope that Bianca and Zoe will get married, that Zoe will remain a no-op/no-hormone TG, that Bianca will have Zoe's children and Zoe will remain dressed as Zarf. They are NOT seeing the full play of layers and now either hope for something less-than-lesbian or closer-to-straight for Bianca. And for those that never wanted Bianca to be gay...well, now they have something to grab a hold of.

I want AMC to own this story if they're going to tell it, instead of treating someone changing their orientation (this is a conversion story on some levels...because if this couple was a hit with the audience, then AMC would never show Bianca with a bio-female actor as a gf EVER AGAIN and I feel confident of that) essentially before our eyes and saying it's gay, Gay, GAAAAY! They simplified and fairy-tailized this story and de-sorased Bianca's emotional maturity for this story. If they're gonna tell it...then AMC needs to be REAL about it and not gloss over the myriad issues this story raises.

So because McT was desperate and arrogant. Because GLAAD is so up it's own ass and panting after a couple of PSAs (and the are NOT a TG support organization, I've seen TGs online complaining about that fact and I have also found TG suppport for this story waning, not growing as it plays out) that it couldn't see the potential damage to Bianca's character. GLAAD couldn't or wouldn't bother to see in the context of how under-developed Bianca's lesbian love life has been for the last 7 years, that to now pair her with girlfriend played by a biological man, creates confusion, sends mixed and bad messages and while maybe educating people in some manner about TGs, misrepresenting the lesbian experience.

If the story is clouding the minds of straight viewers about what it means to be lesbian...then the

story is not worth it. And it's doing just that.

Everybody is all about Zoe's integrity. Zoe, Zoe, Zoe. Must honor Zoe. Must see her as a woman and nothing else. F*ck, Bianca's integrity as a lesbian. She must sacrifice her integrity for Zoe and there's no need to subsume one minority for another, especially when this story would have been better told and more clear for the audience has they remained friends.

This story goes to great lengths to support that Zoe is a woman, through and through, 100% at the moment she claims it, no further action required. They try to sell soul love and tell us bodies don't matter to lesbians, it's all about what's on the inside...the outside doesn't matter as long as the soul is gender-appropriate. Yet, at the same time...Zoe is going to EXTRAORDINARY lengths to change her very exterior from male to female. Why, because BODIES MATTER. It matters enough to TGs that they will make the most difficult choices a human may face. But it does matter. The show wants it every way. Mostly they want it Zoe's way at Bianca's expense, but then arguments used to support Zoe's womanhood are contradicting themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry, this won't fly...

Bianca fell for a man who presented himself as a man when they met. Zoarf's feelings on his/her anatomy is totally irrelevant. You see, I guess we were supposed to see the spiritual connection between the two, thus explaining how and why Bianca was feeling what she was feeling, but that is not what happened. On my screen, I saw a woman, who happens to be a lesbian, fall for a man!

So, one can only conclude that Bianca is bisexual or even trisexual, if you will...

ANDREA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's easy for you, though, because you, like you said, you are gay and you have absolutely no attraction towards men at all. But there are those who have slight attraction to one sex, heavy attraction to the other, or vice versa, or heavy attraction to them both, or whatever.

And I agree, it doesn't make sense at all for Bianca to fall for someone who is a man on the outside. They've never ever suggested that Bianca has had an attraction to men. Now that I think about it, this story would have been eons better had Maggie come to town and feel for Zoe. She has a fucked up sense of what her orientation is (not gay, not straight, not even bisexual), so it would have made so much more sense and I think it would have been some riveting stuff for Bianca and Maggie as a couple (given Maggie never cheated on Binks in France and they came back together when Binks returned last year).

ETA: Oh and I understand what you mean when you say that there's a difference between labels and self-identification, but in a way, I think people are very able to self-identify themselves into a label, even if they know it isn't completely true. You're 100% gay, so it's not hard for you to just say "I'm gay" or "I'm a lesbian" because it's true. It's hard for me to say "I'm gay," because sometimes I am attracted to females. I don't like saying "I'm bisexual" either because it implies that I have an equal attraction to women and men, but that's not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Colby really has matured, I thought those scenes Wednesday were great.

The end was great with all the lights off and Tad confronts Adam!

Swan song for Bianca/Zoe, that was funny that he thought Adam was the one who was the secret admirer.

Of course Lily won't see Ava!!! Grr!! I wouldn't mind seeing Jonathan/Ava, but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Today was a short one. Only 33 minutes.  The ‘Part One’ graphic at the beginning was pretty interesting though. I didn’t expect them to do something like that.  I like how everything was focused around John and his family and friends. Again, the acting and the dialogue was very well done and well written. And I love that they were able to incorporate Drake’s, “swing for the fences” phrase into the script. It was nice seeing everyone interact with each other, especially characters who don’t often share scenes together. It felt like every character was part of a big family or community. Plus, an outdoor funeral in June makes a lot more sense than an outdoor funeral in December.  But yeah, it’s very, very strange that Will isn’t at the funeral, especially since we know that 

      Please register in order to view this content

      I would much rather he had been there today. And, where’s Anna too? And Jack and Jennifer? What was the point of bringing them all back if they weren’t going to attend the funeral? I expected Steve to want to close down BlackPatch, though I’d rather he just retire and let Paul take it over. But I like that Kayla was there to comfort him. I wonder if he’s going to change his mind at some point.  It was nice seeing Shane again too. Now, he just needs to have more scenes with his son lol but I enjoyed seeing him comfort Marlena. I’m not really sure about his interaction with Cat though? Was it really necessary for this to happen now, at John’s funeral? They could’ve waited a little longer to introduce this story arc.  Btw, was Tate bleeding from his head in his first scene with Arianna? 
    • This is the coldest early June in my life. It's like it's January. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Now this strikes me as funny. I have it up on my acct. The thing is I only have S2. Didn't want either 1 or 3.  Perhaps I should just list all of these that I have up.  Parodies: Dirty Sexy Money, Filthy Rich Incomplete: The Monroes, All That Glitters, Falcon Crest (have all just not all up), Once & Again S2 only Complete: Models Inc, Pasadena, Pacific Palisades, Paper Dolls, Flamingo Road  
    • This is wonderful! Thank you for posting this! I loved the first two seasons and never got to see the final season when they cancelled the DVD release. I've been hoping this popped up on streaming but no luck. Happy I'll finally get to see how it ended!
    • “Gender is who you are, and sexuality is who you want.” — C.N. Lester, “Trans Like Me: A Journey for All of Us” St. Pete bridge lit for Pride

      Please register in order to view this content

    • In case it is of interest to anyone here, I have digital copies (computer files, mp4 etc.) of all of the episodes. And, besides having the files they are all up on my usual video hosting site, acct name: shallotpeel, channel it is in: Primetime Soaps and file names like  Flamingo Road S1E15 Hurricane Flamingo Road was a primetime soap on NBC by Lorimar Productions. 2 seasons. 1980-1982. Morgan Fairchild, Barbara Rush. Developed by Rita Lakin.   
    • Arguably DAYS OF OUR LIVES has been brilliant lately & definitely was last week. But, here I am with nitpick & technicalities. This was the only misstep but it was just a stupid thing that should have been caught. Deidre Hall as Marlena has this one problematic line, "It didn't matter how many identities you had, I always knew exactly who you were, you were the man who saved my life." - Marlena, DAYS, 6-2-25 Unfortunately the flashback closest to it was when Marlena was on the phone, terrified because she thought he was Stefano. Yes, it's true that the line is not accurate. There were many times when she did not feel the way she is claiming because of whatever was going on in story with his 'retconned to hell & back' identity & origin story. Does it keep the whole week from being called excellent? Nope.  
    • The Vault has been down all night.
    • Notable: Glendale is not exactly a progressive enclave.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Newsom is a craven opportunist, but his comments today were exactly how better people need to handle Trump.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy